Eerste Divisie17°2,6 mm16 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    MVV MaastrichtMVV MaastrichtPossession control
    vs
    VolendamVolendamLow block & direct
    The model's lean: 2 · Volendam (44%)Best value by the model: 1 · MVV Maastricht @ 3.95 (+25 %)
    Limited dataThe model has thin or uncertain data for this match — the forecast may be unreliable and the match is excluded from our value lists.

    MVV MaastrichtVolendam · Eerste Divisie

    1 · MVV Maastricht 32%X 24%44% Volendam · 2

    Analysis: MVV MaastrichtVolendam

    Marcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work

    Six points on the table say MVV Maastricht have the upper hand, yet the model favours FC Volendam with a 44% win probability. It’s an intriguing mismatch between current form and statistical expectation. Volendam's penchant for scoring in 16 consecutive league matches suggests they're an offensive threat, even if their defence has been porous.

    MVV Maastricht, though leading in league points, also claims the edge in expected metrics—xG and xPoints—hinting at a more sustainable form. Their possession-based style might stifle Volendam's low block and direct play, particularly as the weather forecast calls for rain, which typically dampens goal opportunities. This match could hinge on who adapts better to slick conditions, with MVV potentially benefitting.

    Two matches between these sides since 2023 provide a slim head-to-head dataset that leans slightly toward FC Volendam. However, with MVV's current statistical edges, one might argue the head-to-head weighs less than recent form and expected metrics. Both clubs' expected goals predict a narrow affair—MVV Maastricht 1.30 to FC Volendam's 1.35—signalling a tactical chess match rather than a goalfest.

    The model’s inclination towards FC Volendam aligns with a cautious optimism for an away win, but all evidence considered, a scoreline of 1-1 seems the most likely, capturing both the likelihood of goals and the model's slight nod to Volendam. The 50% forecast for over 2.5 goals and 54% for both teams to score underscores the balance here, tilting slightly towards a low-scoring draw due to expected rain.

    For those seeking value, Bet365 offers FC Volendam to win at odds of 2.50. While not a guarantee, it reflects the model's lean combined with Volendam's scoring streak. If you're riding the analytical edge, this could be the sharpest option in a tightly contested matchup.

    MVV MaastrichtMVV Maastricht
    Form DDLWW
    League ranking xG #4xGA #7xT #9xP/match #5Points #2
    Key players
    • Olivier DumontRWxG 0.25 · xT 0.21
    • Delano AsanteRWxG 0.07 · xT 0.13
    • Lennerd DaneelsLWxG 0.12 · xT 0.33
    VolendamVolendam
    Form WWLLW
    League ranking xG #14xGA #8xT #10xP/match #11Points #11
    Key players
    • Nordin BukalaFxG 0.02 · xT 0.01
    • Henk VeermanLWxG 0.54 · xT 0.19
    • Nick DoodemanRWxG 0.02 · xT 0.46

    Match prediction: MVV MaastrichtVolendam

    Predicted score matrix

    Volendam
    MVV Maastricht
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–07.4%
    0–19.1%
    0–26.4%
    0–32.9%
    0–4+1.3%
    1
    1–08.8%
    1–112.7%
    1–28.4%
    1–33.8%
    1–4+1.7%
    2
    2–06.0%
    2–18.1%
    2–25.5%
    2–32.5%
    2–4+1.1%
    3
    3–02.6%
    3–13.5%
    3–22.4%
    3–31.1%
    3–4+0.5%
    4+
    4+–01.1%
    4+–11.5%
    4+–21.0%
    4+–30.5%
    4+–4+0.2%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-113%
    2. 2.0-19%
    3. 3.1-09%
    4. 4.1-28%
    5. 5.2-18%
    Expected goals
    1,301,35
    Both teams to score
    54%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,7
    Under 2,550%
    @2.48EV+25%
    Over 2,550%
    @1.50

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Volendam or draw (X2)65%
    • Under 3.5 goals72%

    Combined probability

    47%

    Fair odds

    2.13

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Volendam or draw (X2)65%
    • Under 2.5 goals50%
    • Henk Veerman to score32%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score54%
    • Over 2.5 goals50%
    • Henk Veerman to score32%
    • Mawouna Kodjo Amevor to be booked22%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 1 · MVV Maastricht32% probability@3.95BetsafeEV+25%reference odds
    • 1 · MVV Maastricht32% probability@3.95BetssonEV+25%reference odds
    • 1 · MVV Maastricht32% probability@3.95NordicbetEV+25%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · MVV MaastrichtX2 · Volendam
    Betsafe
    EV+ 25%
    3.95
    3.601.80
    Betsson
    EV+ 25%
    3.95
    3.601.80
    Nordicbet
    EV+ 25%
    3.95
    3.601.80

    Odds updated 18 Aug, 06:35

    Odds movement

    1+11 %
    27 %22 %

    3.553.95

    X0 %
    27 %22 %

    3.603.60

    2-6 %
    53 %48 %

    1.921.80

    Over 2,5-1 %
    64 %59 %

    1.521.50

    Betsson · 7 recorded price levels · 17/08/2026 → 18/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    2 matches
    MVV Maastricht 0Draw 1Volendam 1
    Goals: 35 (⌀ 4)

    Head-to-head based on Eerste Divisie data since 2023.

    Key facts

    • FC Volendam have scored in 16 consecutive league matches.
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    MVV Maastricht
    Volendam
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    MVV Maastricht (53)
    Volendam (53)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    MVV Maastricht
    Finn Jesper Dicke: 112 passningar, xT 0.49DickeSil van der Wegen: 93 passningar, xT 0.02WegenMilan Hofland: 85 passningar, xT 0.07HoflandStan Van Dessel: 75 passningar, xT 0.14DesselDelano Asante: 74 passningar, xT 0.24AsanteHugo Wentges: 60 passningar, xT 0.17WentgesOlivier Dumont: 56 passningar, xT 0.09DumontElias Sierra-Cappelletti: 55 passningar, xT -0.01Sierra-CappellettiLennerd Daneels: 43 passningar, xT 0.65DaneelsIlias Breugelmans: 40 passningar, xT 0.31BreugelmansRobert Klaasen: 33 passningar, xT 0.07Klaasen
    Volendam
    Precious Joel Uche-Chukwu Ugwu: 110 passningar, xT 0.18UgwuDaan Huisman: 88 passningar, xT 0.11HuismanMawouna Amevor: 70 passningar, xT 0.09AmevorRoy Johannes Maria Steur: 67 passningar, xT 0.13SteurNordin Bukala: 58 passningar, xT 0.05BukalaErik Schouten: 46 passningar, xT 0.1SchoutenNick Doodeman: 40 passningar, xT 0.89DoodemanLuca Blondeau: 37 passningar, xT 0.04BlondeauDéron Payne: 36 passningar, xT 0.03PayneKayden Wolff: 30 passningar, xT 0.31WolffMike Kleijn: 29 passningar, xT 0.09Kleijn
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    MVV Maastricht
    Finn Jesper Dicke: 112 passningar, xT 0.49DickeSil van der Wegen: 93 passningar, xT 0.02WegenMilan Hofland: 85 passningar, xT 0.07HoflandStan Van Dessel: 75 passningar, xT 0.14DesselDelano Asante: 74 passningar, xT 0.24AsanteHugo Wentges: 60 passningar, xT 0.17WentgesOlivier Dumont: 56 passningar, xT 0.09DumontElias Sierra-Cappelletti: 55 passningar, xT -0.01Sierra-CappellettiLennerd Daneels: 43 passningar, xT 0.65DaneelsIlias Breugelmans: 40 passningar, xT 0.31BreugelmansRobert Klaasen: 33 passningar, xT 0.07Klaasen
    Volendam
    Precious Joel Uche-Chukwu Ugwu: 110 passningar, xT 0.18UgwuDaan Huisman: 88 passningar, xT 0.11HuismanMawouna Amevor: 70 passningar, xT 0.09AmevorRoy Johannes Maria Steur: 67 passningar, xT 0.13SteurNordin Bukala: 58 passningar, xT 0.05BukalaErik Schouten: 46 passningar, xT 0.1SchoutenNick Doodeman: 40 passningar, xT 0.89DoodemanLuca Blondeau: 37 passningar, xT 0.04BlondeauDéron Payne: 36 passningar, xT 0.03PayneKayden Wolff: 30 passningar, xT 0.31WolffMike Kleijn: 29 passningar, xT 0.09Kleijn

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceMVV MaastrichtVolendam
    Points63
    xPoints3.52.4
    xG per match2.11.2
    xGA per match1.31.4
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.430.05
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.080.03
    Playing styleMVV MaastrichtVolendam
    Build-up efficiency0.30.31
    Field tilt0.550.5
    xT per match1.31.2
    xTA per match10.95
    Won balls, offensive half2022
    Pressing intensity0.240.23
    Pressing efficiency0.350.31
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.350.29
    Entries into the box per match1212
    Entries into the box against1613
    Pass completion %0.760.75
    Pass completion % under pressure0.710.71
    Passes per match367358
    Passes against per match281340
    Switches of play per match35.530.6
    Long balls per match4939
    Set piecesMVV MaastrichtVolendam
    xG from free kicks00.06
    Corners per match2.54.6
    Corners against per match5.48.7
    xG per corner0.030.04
    xGA per corner against0.070.02
    First touch, offensive corners %0.20.44
    First touch, defensive corners %0.180.65
    OtherMVV MaastrichtVolendam
    Throw-in control0.650.81
    The goalkeepersHugo Wentges (MVV Maastricht)Roy Johannes Maria Steur (Volendam)
    Saves49
    Save %67%75%
    xG prevented60%41%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins MVV Maastricht vs Volendam according to our model?

    The model gives Volendam a 44% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: MVV Maastricht 32%, draw 24%, Volendam 44%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 50% and under at 50%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 54% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.