01 · 2 legs
Safe
- NEC to win48%
- Over 1.5 goals82%
EredivisieKoning Willem II Stadion, Tilburg24°1,5 mm13 km/h
Läs på svenskaAnna Karlsson · · How the predictions work
NEC's relentless scoring streak, now at 24 consecutive league matches, paints a picture of a team full of attacking verve. Contrast this with Willem II, whose defensive frailties are underscored by an xGA of 2.4 per match since 2022. It’s a tale of two teams heading in different directions, at least if the advanced metrics tell the story.
Willem II, however, hold a small head-to-head advantage over NEC, having not lost in their last two encounters since 2022. But with such a small sample size, it’s hardly the stat to hang your hat on, especially when the model favours NEC with a 48% win probability. The most telling numbers might just be their xG and xGA metrics: NEC boast a superior 2.0 xG per match compared to Willem II’s 1.5, and they’re far more miserly in defence, conceding nearly one fewer expected goal per match.
The expected goals forecast of 1.42 for Willem II and 1.70 for NEC suggests a tight affair, with NEC’s edge in attacking threat potentially deciding the contest. With 60% lean towards over 2.5 goals and a 62% chance of both teams getting on the scoresheet, the match is likely to be anything but a dull stalemate. However, should the weather turn, particularly with rain and strong winds, goals might prove more elusive.
NEC’s high-pressing, possession-based style should couple well with their scoring form to exploit Willem II’s direct but shaky defence. Expect NEC to edge this, perhaps 2-1, aligning with the 9% model probability for that exact scoreline.
For punters, the real intrigue lies in the betting market. With Willem II priced generously at 5.82 by Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet, the model sees a 56% value edge at these odds. While NEC looks likely to claim victory, the value on a home win is significant, offering a tantalising prospect for the bold bettor willing to wager on an upset.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Willem II | X | 2 · NEC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | EV+ 30% 4.85 | EV+ 7% 4.28 | 1.59 |
| Betsson | EV+ 30% 4.85 | EV+ 7% 4.28 | 1.59 |
| Nordicbet | EV+ 30% 4.85 | EV+ 7% 4.28 | 1.59 |
| Pinnacle | EV+ 30% 4.84 | EV+ 14% 4.57 | 1.57 |
Odds updated 13 Aug, 14:35
Market signal
The market has moved clearly towards a Willem II win since 9 August — the odds have shortened from 5.39 to 4.84 (−10%).
5.39 → 4.84
4.73 → 4.57
1.48 → 1.57
Pinnacle · 7 recorded price levels · 09/08/2026 → 13/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Eredivisie data since 2022.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Willem II | NEC |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 0 | 0 |
| xPoints | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| xG per match | 1.5 | 2 |
| xGA per match | 2.4 | 1.4 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.04 | 0.4 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.09 | 0.46 |
| Playing style | Willem II | NEC |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.32 | 0.32 |
| Field tilt | 0.18 | 0.87 |
| xT per match | 0.67 | 2.6 |
| xTA per match | 1.9 | 0.93 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 14 | 34 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.22 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.24 | 0.36 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.18 | 0.3 |
| Entries into the box per match | 9 | 45 |
| Entries into the box against | 21 | 9 |
| Pass completion % | 0.72 | 0.8 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.71 | 0.76 |
| Passes per match | 211 | 500 |
| Passes against per match | 535 | 159 |
| Switches of play per match | 26.5 | 23 |
| Long balls per match | 34 | 26 |
| Set pieces | Willem II | NEC |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.24 | 0 |
| Corners per match | 2 | 13 |
| Corners against per match | 6.1 | 3 |
| xG per corner | 0.24 | 0.01 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.04 | 0.08 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 1 | 0.46 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.5 | 0.67 |
| Other | Willem II | NEC |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.84 | 0.9 |
| The goalkeepers | Thomas Didillon-Hödl (Willem II) | Gonzalo Alejandro Crettaz (NEC) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 3 | 1 |
| Save % | 75% | 33% |
| xG prevented | 45% | 9% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives NEC a 48% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Willem II 27%, draw 25%, NEC 48%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 60% and under at 40%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 62% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.