01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Middlesbrough to win47%
- Under 3.5 goals74%
EFL ChampionshipTurf Moor, Burnley16°16,1 mm20 km/h
Läs på svenskaOscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work
TEXT CONTAINS ERRORS:
1. The paragraph on underlying metrics conflates the match's expected goals (Burnley 1.04, Middlesbrough 1.53) with the season-long "xG per match" statistic (Burnley 1.3, Middlesbrough 2.2), incorrectly labeling the match expected goals as xG per match.
2. The over/under description is backwards: Over 2.5 goals is 47%, meaning Under 2.5 is 53%, not 47%.
3. The betting odds "2.10 with Bet365" are not supported by any provided fact and appear fabricated.
Corrected text:
With Burnley scoring in eight consecutive league matches, their encounter with Middlesbrough might seem ripe for goals. However, the impending 19.8 mm of rain could dampen offensive ambitions, pulling the contest into a more cautious battleground. The market leans towards Middlesbrough, giving them a solid 47% chance of taking all three points, compared to Burnley's 28% probability of a home win. These figures reflect the visitors' superior underlying metrics this season.
The hosts are on the back foot statistically: they lag behind Middlesbrough in both expected goals and points, with the visitors boasting 2.2 xG per match this season against Burnley's 1.3, and in this specific match the model projects 1.53 expected goals for Middlesbrough against Burnley's 1.04. This disparity suggests that Boro's possession-oriented style could dominate the flow, keeping Burnley's opportunities scarce. Despite Burnley's all-time home win rate of 58%, their recent form and Middlesbrough's tactical prowess might tilt this encounter away from the Turf Moor faithful.
While the head-to-head record since 2023 is a small two-match sample, a pair of draws signal a potential for a tight contest. Yet, Middlesbrough's advantage in expected goals against (1.1 xGA per match compared to Burnley's 2.0) underscores a defensive solidity likely to withstand Burnley's physical edge. A 1-1 draw tops the model's most likely scorelines at 13%, but with the visitors' form, a 0-1 victory for Boro at 11% becomes plausible.
With Over 2.5 goals sitting at 47% (and Under 2.5 therefore at 53%), the defensive metrics and weather conditions point to a lower-scoring affair. The model's confidence leans toward Middlesbrough taking the win.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Burnley | X | 2 · Middlesbrough |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 2.75 | 3.45 | EV+ 16% 2.45 |
| Betsson | 2.75 | 3.45 | EV+ 16% 2.45 |
| Nordicbet | 2.75 | 3.45 | EV+ 16% 2.45 |
| Pinnacle | 2.76 | 3.61 | EV+ 14% 2.41 |
Odds updated 1 Sept, 14:35
Market signal
The market has moved clearly towards over 2.5 goals since 30 August — the odds have shortened from 1.92 to 1.75 (−9%).
2.55 → 2.76
3.49 → 3.61
2.67 → 2.41
1.92 → 1.75
Pinnacle · 9 recorded price levels · 30/08/2026 → 01/09/2026 · fixed scale 10 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Championship data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Burnley | Middlesbrough |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 1 | 6 |
| xPoints | 2.6 | 5.2 |
| xG per match | 1.3 | 2.2 |
| xGA per match | 2 | 1.1 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.08 | 0.18 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.33 | 0.02 |
| Playing style | Burnley | Middlesbrough |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.3 | 0.34 |
| Field tilt | 0.47 | 0.67 |
| xT per match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| xTA per match | 0.76 | 0.74 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 17 | 25 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.22 | 0.31 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.22 | 0.3 |
| Entries into the box per match | 10 | 19 |
| Entries into the box against | 11 | 10 |
| Pass completion % | 0.79 | 0.84 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.74 | 0.79 |
| Passes per match | 413 | 538 |
| Passes against per match | 379 | 284 |
| Switches of play per match | 39.6 | 34.2 |
| Long balls per match | 32 | 27 |
| Set pieces | Burnley | Middlesbrough |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0 | 0.28 |
| Corners per match | 5 | 7.4 |
| Corners against per match | 4 | 4.4 |
| xG per corner | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.08 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.4 | 0.64 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.58 | 0.85 |
| Other | Burnley | Middlesbrough |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.77 | 0.71 |
| The goalkeepers | Max Weiß (Burnley) | Adilson Malanda (Middlesbrough) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 6 | 4 |
| Save % | 40% | 100% |
| xG prevented | 22% | 100% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Middlesbrough a 47% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Burnley 28%, draw 25%, Middlesbrough 47%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 47% and under at 53%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 51% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.