01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Cardiff City or draw (X2)69%
- Over 1.5 goals79%
EFL ChampionshipLoftus Road, London19°23 km/h
Läs på svenskaSofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work
TEXT: Cardiff City's 43% win probability stands out, suggesting the visitors are more likely to take the spoils. Despite Queens Park Rangers' superior points tally and marginally better recent head-to-head showing, the model leans towards Cardiff. The expected goals figures confirm a tight contest: QPR at 1.30 and Cardiff at 1.60. This hints at a narrow edge for the visitors, likely due to their control-based style overpowering QPR's counter-attacks.
The over 2.5 goals probability of 56% and a 58% chance for both teams to score indicate an expectation for goals. However, the most likely scorelines—1-1 (12%), 1-2 (9%), and 0-1 (8%)—suggest a closely fought battle with Cardiff having the upper hand. The small head-to-head sample since 2023, with QPR unbeaten in two matches, carries less weight than these form dynamics and expected goal metrics.
While QPR boasts a tighter defense with 1.0 xGA per match compared to Cardiff's 1.4, the visitors' offensive edge might just tip the balance. The data points towards Cardiff sneaking a win, leaning towards a 1-2 scoreline, with a slight preference for over 2.5 goals.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Queens Park Rangers | X | 2 · Cardiff City |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bet365 | 1.90 | 3.50 | EV+ 54% 3.60 |
| Pinnacle | 1.93 | EV+ 2% 3.99 | EV+ 48% 3.47 |
Odds updated 1 Sept, 14:31
Market signal
The market has moved clearly towards over 2.5 goals since 30 August — the odds have shortened from 1.83 to 1.69 (−8%).
1.93 → 1.93
3.93 → 3.99
3.55 → 3.47
1.83 → 1.69
Pinnacle · 10 recorded price levels · 30/08/2026 → 01/09/2026 · fixed scale 10 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Championship data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Queens Park Rangers | Cardiff City |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 7 | 3 |
| xPoints | 5.8 | 3.9 |
| xG per match | 1.9 | 2 |
| xGA per match | 1 | 1.4 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.22 | 0.2 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.06 | 0.15 |
| Playing style | Queens Park Rangers | Cardiff City |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.3 | 0.33 |
| Field tilt | 0.52 | 0.68 |
| xT per match | 1.5 | 1.1 |
| xTA per match | 1.1 | 0.76 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 26 | 21 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.25 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.26 | 0.33 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.21 | 0.23 |
| Entries into the box per match | 16 | 14 |
| Entries into the box against | 11 | 13 |
| Pass completion % | 0.76 | 0.79 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.7 | 0.75 |
| Passes per match | 356 | 454 |
| Passes against per match | 382 | 198 |
| Switches of play per match | 25.5 | 39.7 |
| Long balls per match | 32 | 41 |
| Set pieces | Queens Park Rangers | Cardiff City |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.07 | 0.02 |
| Corners per match | 5 | 9.5 |
| Corners against per match | 3.6 | 5.9 |
| xG per corner | 0.04 | 0.07 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.33 | 0.21 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.82 | 0.83 |
| Other | Queens Park Rangers | Cardiff City |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.7 | 0.85 |
| The goalkeepers | Pierce Joseph Charles (Queens Park Rangers) | Nathan Wallace Newman Trott (Cardiff City) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 6 | 14 |
| Save % | 75% | 74% |
| xG prevented | 88% | 52% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Cardiff City a 43% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Queens Park Rangers 32%, draw 26%, Cardiff City 43%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 56% and under at 44%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 58% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.