01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Stockport County or draw (1X)69%
- Over 1.5 goals79%
EFL League OneEdgeley Park, Stockport17°3,0 mm13 km/h
Läs på svenskaErik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
The FACTS list Stockport's 61% home win rate as "all-time (49 played)," not specifically tied to their return to League One — the text adds an unsupported qualifier. Also, the FACTS state 1-1 (12%) is the most likely scoreline, ahead of 2-1 (9%), so calling 2-1 "the most plausible outcome" contradicts the data.
CORRECTED TEXT:
Stockport County's recent form at home, scoring in eight consecutive league matches, sets the stage for a meeting with Wycombe Wanderers that tilts slightly in favor of the hosts. The Edgeley Park faithful have witnessed their team secure victories in 61% of their home fixtures all-time, a statistic that underscores their home advantage against the visitors. The hosts have also had the better of the recent head-to-head encounters, winning three of the last four matches between these sides, albeit from a small sample size.
The expected goals suggest a closely fought encounter, with Stockport predicted to generate 1.59 xG to Wycombe's 1.31. Both teams share a penchant for counter-attacking and crossing, which could lead to a tactical stalemate, particularly with the forecasted 7.0 mm of rain potentially dampening attacking play. Despite this, the model gives a slight lean towards over 2.5 goals (55%), reflecting Stockport's offensive consistency and Wycombe's capacity to exploit any defensive lapses.
Interestingly, the model rates the visitors with a 30% chance of snatching a win, providing a 7% edge at odds of 3.55 with bookmakers like Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet. For those keen on value, Wycombe's odds could offer a tempting proposition, even though the hosts are favored for good reason.
Given the information, a 1-1 draw seems the most plausible outcome, with a 2-1 win for Stockport County close behind. It respects the home side's ability to score consistently while acknowledging Wycombe's potential to find the net. Though the forecasted weather might suppress scoring slightly, it is already factored into the model's calculations, keeping the over 2.5 goals scenario in play. As always, while value leans towards Wycombe at those odds, backing the hosts aligns with the numbers that matter most.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Stockport County | X | 2 · Wycombe Wanderers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 1.85 | 3.45 | EV+ 19% 3.95 |
| Betsson | 1.85 | 3.45 | EV+ 19% 3.95 |
| Nordicbet | 1.85 | 3.45 | EV+ 19% 3.95 |
| Pinnacle | 1.87 | 3.58 | EV+ 21% 4.02 |
Odds updated 27 Aug, 05:17
Market signal
The market has moved clearly towards a Stockport County win since 23 August — the odds have shortened from 2.01 to 1.87 (−7%).
2.01 → 1.87
3.45 → 3.58
3.67 → 4.02
1.83 → 1.83
Pinnacle · 3 recorded price levels · 23/08/2026 → 27/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on League One data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Stockport County | Wycombe Wanderers |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 3 | 2 |
| xPoints | 2.7 | 2.5 |
| xG per match | 2.2 | 1.8 |
| xGA per match | 1.6 | 1.7 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.36 | 0.23 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.85 | 0.2 |
| Playing style | Stockport County | Wycombe Wanderers |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.33 | 0.33 |
| Field tilt | 0.77 | 0.53 |
| xT per match | 2.1 | 0.97 |
| xTA per match | 0.81 | 0.83 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 35 | 24 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.22 | 0.22 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.36 | 0.36 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.31 | 0.36 |
| Entries into the box per match | 22 | 11 |
| Entries into the box against | 7 | 13 |
| Pass completion % | 0.8 | 0.68 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.77 | 0.63 |
| Passes per match | 534 | 291 |
| Passes against per match | 224 | 245 |
| Switches of play per match | 35.5 | 27.3 |
| Long balls per match | 42 | 33 |
| Set pieces | Stockport County | Wycombe Wanderers |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.34 | 0.15 |
| Corners per match | 8.6 | 4.4 |
| Corners against per match | 3.5 | 4.9 |
| xG per corner | 0.01 | 0.07 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.06 | 0.01 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.35 | 0.67 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.71 | 0.8 |
| Other | Stockport County | Wycombe Wanderers |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.79 | 0.58 |
| The goalkeepers | Oliver Whatmuff (Stockport County) | Conor William Hazard (Wycombe Wanderers) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 4 | 8 |
| Save % | 57% | 80% |
| xG prevented | 20% | 74% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Stockport County a 44% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Stockport County 44%, draw 26%, Wycombe Wanderers 30%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 55% and under at 45%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 58% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.