01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Aston Villa to win51%
- Over 1.5 goals77%
Premier LeagueVilla Park, Birmingham14°16 km/h
Läs på svenskaAnna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work
Aston Villa's home advantage, often a fortress in their Premier League campaigns, faces an intriguing challenge against Nottingham Forest. With a 57% win rate at home from their last 40 matches, Villa usually command a strong presence. However, the expected goals (xG) figures and recent form suggest that Forest might possess the sharper edge this time. While Villa have mustered an xG of just 0.65 per match against Forest's more robust 1.4, the visitors also boast a better defensive record with an xGA of 1.2 compared to Villa's 1.7.
The small head-to-head sample since 2022 shows Villa slightly ahead with two wins in four encounters. However, when contrasted with the current season's form, it paints a different picture. Nottingham Forest have edged Villa in both points (2 vs 1) and xPoints (4.6 vs 2.4), indicating their capacity to translate chances into tangible results more effectively in recent times. The model still leans towards Villa, giving them a 51% chance of victory, but the data suggests that Forest’s form could disrupt their rhythm.
Goals might be on the menu, given the 53% probability of over 2.5 goals and both teams scoring at 55%. The teams' direct playing styles might counterbalance the expected rain, which typically suppresses scoring, suggesting that the weather impact is already considered in these odds. With a tight match anticipated, the likeliest scorelines are 1-1, 1-0, and 2-1, each carrying its own narrative of tension and opportunity.
For the discerning punter, the real intrigue lies in the potential value. Aston Villa's 51% model-rated chance of winning at odds of 2.12 with Betsson and Nordicbet presents a tempting 7% edge. Meanwhile, those eyeing a high-scoring thriller could find value in over 4.5 goals at odds of 6.96 with Betsafe, offering a cheeky 6% edge. This encounter teeters on a knife-edge, with Forest's form suggesting an upset could well be on the cards.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Aston Villa | X | 2 · Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | EV+ 10% 2.18 | 3.35 | 3.30 |
| Betsson | EV+ 11% 2.19 | 3.38 | 3.34 |
| Nordicbet | EV+ 10% 2.18 | 3.40 | 3.35 |
| Pinnacle | EV+ 12% 2.21 | 3.53 | 3.31 |
Odds updated 8 Sept, 05:15
Market signal
The market has moved clearly towards an Nottingham Forest win since 4 September — the odds have shortened from 3.63 to 3.31 (−9%).
1.99 → 2.21
3.62 → 3.53
3.63 → 3.31
1.92 → 2.01
Pinnacle · 5 recorded price levels · 04/09/2026 → 08/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Premier League data since 2022.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Aston Villa | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 1 | 2 |
| xPoints | 2.4 | 4.6 |
| xG per match | 0.65 | 1.4 |
| xGA per match | 1.7 | 1.2 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.1 | 0.12 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.27 | 0.21 |
| Playing style | Aston Villa | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.3 | 0.32 |
| Field tilt | 0.46 | 0.42 |
| xT per match | 0.52 | 0.87 |
| xTA per match | 0.84 | 0.7 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 15 | 24 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.21 | 0.28 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.15 | 0.21 |
| Entries into the box per match | 9 | 11 |
| Entries into the box against | 10 | 11 |
| Pass completion % | 0.78 | 0.69 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.74 | 0.67 |
| Passes per match | 354 | 261 |
| Passes against per match | 410 | 393 |
| Switches of play per match | 19.3 | 23.4 |
| Long balls per match | 22 | 31 |
| Set pieces | Aston Villa | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.04 | 0.06 |
| Corners per match | 2.7 | 3.4 |
| Corners against per match | 4 | 5 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.05 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.04 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.38 | 0.3 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.58 | 0.47 |
| Other | Aston Villa | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.69 | 0.81 |
| The goalkeepers | Zion Suzuki (Aston Villa) | Matz Sels (Nottingham Forest) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 5 | 4 |
| Save % | 83% | 57% |
| xG prevented | 23% | 40% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Aston Villa a 51% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Aston Villa 51%, draw 26%, Nottingham Forest 23%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 53% and under at 47%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 55% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.