01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Chelsea to win70%
- Over 1.5 goals80%
Premier LeagueStamford Bridge, London17°0,2 mm14 km/h
Läs på svenskaOscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work
Chelsea enters this matchup with a 70% chance of victory, underscoring their strong position. Despite a slight points edge for the visitors this season, underlying metrics favor the hosts. Chelsea's expected goals of 2.20 against Hull's 0.78 speak volumes: the home side is more efficient in front of goal. Their playing styles mirror each other, both adopting a low-defence, direct approach, but Chelsea's higher xG per match (1.9) indicates they produce better opportunities.
The model leans towards a straightforward Chelsea win, with 2-0 the most likely scoreline at 12%. However, Hull City isn't without hope, having a 12% chance to cause an upset. While such a small percentage might seem negligible, it represents a 60% value edge at odds of 13.5 with Nordicbet. Meanwhile, a potential for both teams to score sits at 48%, hinting at some vulnerability in Chelsea's defense.
The numbers suggest a Chelsea victory is on the cards, with the over 2.5 goals market leaning at 57%. Yet, value seekers may look to Hull's slim but lucrative chances. At odds of 13.5 with Nordicbet, betting on the underdog might just be the shrewdest move, offering a tantalizing edge for those who dare to back a surprise result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Chelsea | X | 2 · Hull City |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 1.23 | EV+ 7% 5.85 | EV+ 66% 14.00 |
| Betsson | 1.23 | EV+ 7% 5.85 | EV+ 69% 14.21 |
| Nordicbet | 1.23 | EV+ 7% 5.85 | EV+ 66% 14.00 |
| Pinnacle | 1.23 | EV+ 10% 6.02 | EV+ 69% 14.25 |
Odds updated 7 Sept, 17:36
1.22 → 1.23
5.81 → 6.02
13.09 → 14.25
Pinnacle · 4 recorded price levels · 04/09/2026 → 07/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Chelsea | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 6 | 7 |
| xPoints | 5.2 | 4.2 |
| xG per match | 1.9 | 0.69 |
| xGA per match | 1.7 | 1.4 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.29 | 0.08 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.41 | 0.07 |
| Playing style | Chelsea | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.33 | 0.3 |
| Field tilt | 0.34 | 0.17 |
| xT per match | 0.7 | 0.55 |
| xTA per match | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 26 | 21 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.23 | 0.21 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.18 | 0.16 |
| Entries into the box per match | 12 | 8 |
| Entries into the box against | 20 | 18 |
| Pass completion % | 0.74 | 0.64 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.71 | 0.7 |
| Passes per match | 263 | 183 |
| Passes against per match | 500 | 578 |
| Switches of play per match | 13.4 | 16.8 |
| Long balls per match | 24 | 26 |
| Set pieces | Chelsea | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.03 | 0.11 |
| Corners per match | 3.7 | 2 |
| Corners against per match | 6 | 5.4 |
| xG per corner | 0.08 | 0.11 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.01 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.27 | 0.33 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.56 | 0.62 |
| Other | Chelsea | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| The goalkeepers | Emiliano Martinez (Chelsea) | Konstantinos Tzolakis (Hull City) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 12 | 10 |
| Save % | 75% | 100% |
| xG prevented | 65% | 100% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Chelsea a 70% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Chelsea 70%, draw 18%, Hull City 12%.
The model's most likely final score is 2-0 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 57% and under at 43%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 48% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.