01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Liverpool to win58%
- Under 3.5 goals72%
Premier LeagueAnfield, Liverpool17°5,9 mm13 km/h
Läs på svenskaAnna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work
TEXT: Liverpool's 18-game scoring streak is the defining factor as they face Nottingham Forest. Despite the hosts' impressive ability to consistently find the net, their head-to-head with Forest since 2022 has been less convincing, with only one win in four encounters. However, Liverpool's form and their home win rate of 68% provide a strong foundation for their favoritism in this match.
The model's expected goals suggest a clear but not overwhelming advantage for the home side, predicting 1.73 xG for Liverpool against Forest's 0.95. This aligns with the most likely scorelines of 1-1 and 1-0 at 12% each, indicating a tight contest. Despite the potential for goals, the likelihood of over 2.5 goals and both teams scoring hovers around 50%, reflecting the impact of expected rain, which typically dampens high-scoring affairs.
Nottingham Forest's value bet at odds of 6.63 with Betsson, and 6.6 with Betsafe and Nordicbet, offers a lucrative edge given the model's 19% win probability for them—an edge of 29%. Yet, Liverpool's high pressing and possession style should see them edge this with a 1-0 victory, maintaining their scoring run while the visitors may find breaking through difficult.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Liverpool | X | 2 · Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 1.52 | 4.25 | EV+ 21% 6.20 |
| Betsson | 1.52 | 4.27 | EV+ 22% 6.24 |
| Nordicbet | 1.52 | 4.25 | EV+ 21% 6.20 |
| Pinnacle | 1.55 | EV+ 3% 4.55 | EV+ 11% 5.68 |
Odds updated 27 Aug, 16:39
1.49 → 1.55
4.58 → 4.55
5.86 → 5.68
Pinnacle · 8 recorded price levels · 23/08/2026 → 27/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Premier League data since 2022.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Liverpool | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 1 | 0 |
| xPoints | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| xG per match | 3.5 | 0.88 |
| xGA per match | 1.3 | 0.86 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 1.6 | 0.05 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.31 | 0.16 |
| Playing style | Liverpool | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.34 | 0.32 |
| Field tilt | 0.7 | 0.68 |
| xT per match | 1.2 | 0.9 |
| xTA per match | 0.61 | 0.52 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 33 | 24 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.19 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.33 | 0.31 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.34 | 0.26 |
| Entries into the box per match | 14 | 13 |
| Entries into the box against | 7 | 6 |
| Pass completion % | 0.76 | 0.75 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.72 | 0.68 |
| Passes per match | 366 | 353 |
| Passes against per match | 223 | 249 |
| Switches of play per match | 25.3 | 40.9 |
| Long balls per match | 25 | 43 |
| Set pieces | Liverpool | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.3 | 0.17 |
| Corners per match | 5.8 | 3.1 |
| Corners against per match | 1.9 | 2 |
| xG per corner | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0 | 0 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.33 | 0.33 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 1 | 0.5 |
| Other | Liverpool | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.74 | 1 |
| The goalkeepers | Alisson Becker (Liverpool) | Ibrahim Sangaré (Nottingham Forest) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 3 | 3 |
| Save % | 60% | 100% |
| xG prevented | 68% | 100% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Liverpool a 58% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Liverpool 58%, draw 23%, Nottingham Forest 19%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 50% and under at 50%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 51% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.