J1 LeagueSanga Stadium by Kyocera, Kyoto30°1,8 mm9 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Kyoto SangaKyoto SangaPossession control
    vs
    Mito HollyhockMito HollyhockBalanced & physical
    The model's lean: 1 · Kyoto Sanga (46%)Best value by the model: Over 2,5 @ 2.20 (+1 %)

    Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock · J1 League

    1 · Kyoto Sanga 46%X 27%27% Mito Hollyhock · 2

    Analysis: Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock

    Sofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work

    Kyoto Sanga FC are riding the model's wave of favouritism with a 46% probability of victory against Mito Hollyhock, who are pegged at a modest 27%. Yet, the numbers reveal a narrative rich with nuance. Kyoto's possession-focused style is set to challenge Hollyhock's balanced and physical approach, especially under the looming threat of 5.5 mm of rain, which could put a damper on free-flowing football.

    Kyoto Sanga FC's expected goals tally of 1.51 suggests they might edge proceedings, though their xG per match of 0.83 falls short when compared to Mito Hollyhock's 1.5. This discrepancy hints at a potential underperformance by Kyoto in converting chances, while Mito's resilience and sharpness in attack underscore their latent threat. However, Kyoto's defensive metrics, with an xGA of 1.4, slightly outshine Mito's 1.5, hinting at a potentially tight affair.

    The most likely scoreline, a 1-1 draw at 13%, reflects this tension and aligns well with the 50% probability of both teams finding the net. Yet, the model's nod to a 1-0 victory for the hosts at 12% isn't easily dismissed, especially considering the weather's role in possibly limiting chances. Despite Kyoto's possession game, Mito's edge in xPoints at 2.8 suggests their ability to grind out results in tough conditions.

    Mito Hollyhock's physicality and efficiency in creating xG within 8 seconds of winning the ball, albeit marginally better at 0.17 compared to Kyoto's 0.16, could be crucial in unlocking Kyoto's defence. As for goals, the over 2.5 market at odds of 2.2 with Pinnacle gleams with value, despite the model setting it at 46%. This slight edge might tip the scales in favour of an open game, should conditions allow.

    The sharpest view? Despite the drizzle and the model's conservative lean, there's a whisper of value in backing over 2.5 goals, particularly if the match opens up, as both teams possess the attacking metrics to breach each other's rearguard.

    Kyoto SangaKyoto Sanga
    Form LWWLD
    League ranking xG #17xGA #12xT #12xP/match #16Points #14
    Key players
    • Rafael Elias da Silva BatagliaCMxG 0.42 · xT 0.06
    • João Pedro Mendes SantosCDMxG 0.03 · xT 0.12
    • Shinnosuke FukudaRWBxG 0.07 · xT 0.33
    Mito HollyhockMito Hollyhock
    Form LD
    League ranking xG #6xGA #15xT #11xP/match #10Points #15
    Key players
    • Sho OmoriLWxG 0.00 · xT 0.19
    • Kotaro UchinoFxG 0.49 · xT -0.08
    • Kenta ItakuraCBxG 0.04 · xT 0.01

    Match prediction: Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock

    Predicted score matrix

    Mito Hollyhock
    Kyoto Sanga
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–08.5%
    0–17.8%
    0–24.0%
    0–31.3%
    0–4+0.4%
    1
    1–011.9%
    1–112.6%
    1–26.1%
    1–32.0%
    1–4+0.6%
    2
    2–09.3%
    2–19.3%
    2–24.6%
    2–31.5%
    2–4+0.5%
    3
    3–04.7%
    3–14.7%
    3–22.3%
    3–30.8%
    3–4+0.2%
    4+
    4+–02.5%
    4+–12.5%
    4+–21.2%
    4+–30.4%
    4+–4+0.1%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-113%
    2. 2.1-012%
    3. 3.2-09%
    4. 4.2-19%
    5. 5.0-08%
    Expected goals
    1,511,00
    Both teams to score
    50%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,5
    Under 2,554%
    @1.68
    Over 2,546%
    @2.20EV+1%

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Kyoto Sanga to win46%
    • Under 3.5 goals76%

    Combined probability

    35%

    Fair odds

    2.84

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Kyoto Sanga to win46%
    • Under 2.5 goals54%
    • Rafael Elias da Silva Bataglia to score32%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score50%
    • Over 2.5 goals46%
    • Rafael Elias da Silva Bataglia to score32%
    • Kenta Itakura to be booked21%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • Over 2.546% probability@2.20PinnacleEV+1%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · Kyoto SangaX2 · Mito Hollyhock
    Betsafe2.023.203.50
    Betsson2.023.203.50
    Nordicbet2.023.203.50
    Pinnacle2.063.493.54

    Odds updated 16 Aug, 14:35

    Statistics

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Kyoto Sanga
    Mito Hollyhock
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Kyoto Sanga (34)
    Mito Hollyhock (23)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Kyoto Sanga
    João Pedro Mendes Santos: 91 passningar, xT 0.23SantosShinnosuke Fukuda: 87 passningar, xT 0.61FukudaWeverton Silva de Andrade: 85 passningar, xT 0.01AndradeKyo Sato: 72 passningar, xT 0.25SatoGakuji Ota: 45 passningar, xT 0.06OtaYoshinori Suzuki: 42 passningar, xT 0.04SuzukiRen Kato: 42 passningar, xT 0.07KatoShimpei Fukuoka: 40 passningar, xT 0.07FukuokaRafael Elias da Silva Bataglia: 39 passningar, xT -0.05BatagliaSung-Jun Yoon: 37 passningar, xT 0.03YoonHenrique de Souza Trevisan: 36 passningar, xT 0.02Trevisan
    Mito Hollyhock
    Kenta Itakura: 98 passningar, xT 0.04ItakuraYasuki Kimoto: 76 passningar, xT 0.21KimotoTaishi Semba: 74 passningar, xT 0.09SembaKonosuke Nishikawa: 73 passningar, xT 0.17NishikawaSho Omori: 70 passningar, xT 0.37OmoriYu Funabashi: 59 passningar, xT 0.17FunabashiTakumi Mase: 52 passningar, xT 0.24MaseAkinari Kawazura: 26 passningar, xT 0.03KawazuraYoshiki Torikai: 23 passningar, xT 0.16TorikaiArata Watanabe: 23 passningar, xT -0.01WatanabeKotaro Uchino: 20 passningar, xT -0.19Uchino
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Kyoto Sanga
    João Pedro Mendes Santos: 91 passningar, xT 0.23SantosShinnosuke Fukuda: 87 passningar, xT 0.61FukudaWeverton Silva de Andrade: 85 passningar, xT 0.01AndradeKyo Sato: 72 passningar, xT 0.25SatoGakuji Ota: 45 passningar, xT 0.06OtaYoshinori Suzuki: 42 passningar, xT 0.04SuzukiRen Kato: 42 passningar, xT 0.07KatoShimpei Fukuoka: 40 passningar, xT 0.07FukuokaRafael Elias da Silva Bataglia: 39 passningar, xT -0.05BatagliaSung-Jun Yoon: 37 passningar, xT 0.03YoonHenrique de Souza Trevisan: 36 passningar, xT 0.02Trevisan
    Mito Hollyhock
    Kenta Itakura: 98 passningar, xT 0.04ItakuraYasuki Kimoto: 76 passningar, xT 0.21KimotoTaishi Semba: 74 passningar, xT 0.09SembaKonosuke Nishikawa: 73 passningar, xT 0.17NishikawaSho Omori: 70 passningar, xT 0.37OmoriYu Funabashi: 59 passningar, xT 0.17FunabashiTakumi Mase: 52 passningar, xT 0.24MaseAkinari Kawazura: 26 passningar, xT 0.03KawazuraYoshiki Torikai: 23 passningar, xT 0.16TorikaiArata Watanabe: 23 passningar, xT -0.01WatanabeKotaro Uchino: 20 passningar, xT -0.19Uchino

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceKyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
    Points11
    xPoints1.92.8
    xG per match0.831.5
    xGA per match1.41.5
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.160.17
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.370.24
    Playing styleKyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
    Build-up efficiency0.320.33
    Field tilt0.520.34
    xT per match0.90.91
    xTA per match1.20.73
    Won balls, offensive half1827
    Pressing intensity0.230.24
    Pressing efficiency0.330.24
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.290.27
    Entries into the box per match1413
    Entries into the box against1814
    Pass completion %0.740.78
    Pass completion % under pressure0.690.74
    Passes per match354342
    Passes against per match324559
    Switches of play per match23.624.4
    Long balls per match2134
    Set piecesKyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
    xG from free kicks0.030.2
    Corners per match2.57.3
    Corners against per match6.55.2
    xG per corner00.04
    xGA per corner against0.020.05
    First touch, offensive corners %0.40.29
    First touch, defensive corners %0.620.5
    OtherKyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
    Throw-in control0.680.67
    The goalkeepersGakuji Ota (Kyoto Sanga)Konosuke Nishikawa (Mito Hollyhock)
    Saves79
    Save %64%75%
    xG prevented33%53%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Kyoto Sanga vs Mito Hollyhock according to our model?

    The model gives Kyoto Sanga a 46% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Kyoto Sanga 46%, draw 27%, Mito Hollyhock 27%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 46% and under at 54%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 50% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.