01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Kyoto Sanga to win46%
- Under 3.5 goals76%
J1 LeagueSanga Stadium by Kyocera, Kyoto30°1,8 mm9 km/h
Läs på svenskaSofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work
Kyoto Sanga FC are riding the model's wave of favouritism with a 46% probability of victory against Mito Hollyhock, who are pegged at a modest 27%. Yet, the numbers reveal a narrative rich with nuance. Kyoto's possession-focused style is set to challenge Hollyhock's balanced and physical approach, especially under the looming threat of 5.5 mm of rain, which could put a damper on free-flowing football.
Kyoto Sanga FC's expected goals tally of 1.51 suggests they might edge proceedings, though their xG per match of 0.83 falls short when compared to Mito Hollyhock's 1.5. This discrepancy hints at a potential underperformance by Kyoto in converting chances, while Mito's resilience and sharpness in attack underscore their latent threat. However, Kyoto's defensive metrics, with an xGA of 1.4, slightly outshine Mito's 1.5, hinting at a potentially tight affair.
The most likely scoreline, a 1-1 draw at 13%, reflects this tension and aligns well with the 50% probability of both teams finding the net. Yet, the model's nod to a 1-0 victory for the hosts at 12% isn't easily dismissed, especially considering the weather's role in possibly limiting chances. Despite Kyoto's possession game, Mito's edge in xPoints at 2.8 suggests their ability to grind out results in tough conditions.
Mito Hollyhock's physicality and efficiency in creating xG within 8 seconds of winning the ball, albeit marginally better at 0.17 compared to Kyoto's 0.16, could be crucial in unlocking Kyoto's defence. As for goals, the over 2.5 market at odds of 2.2 with Pinnacle gleams with value, despite the model setting it at 46%. This slight edge might tip the scales in favour of an open game, should conditions allow.
The sharpest view? Despite the drizzle and the model's conservative lean, there's a whisper of value in backing over 2.5 goals, particularly if the match opens up, as both teams possess the attacking metrics to breach each other's rearguard.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Kyoto Sanga | X | 2 · Mito Hollyhock |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 2.02 | 3.20 | 3.50 |
| Betsson | 2.02 | 3.20 | 3.50 |
| Nordicbet | 2.02 | 3.20 | 3.50 |
| Pinnacle | 2.06 | 3.49 | 3.54 |
Odds updated 16 Aug, 14:35
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Kyoto Sanga | Mito Hollyhock |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 1 | 1 |
| xPoints | 1.9 | 2.8 |
| xG per match | 0.83 | 1.5 |
| xGA per match | 1.4 | 1.5 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.16 | 0.17 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.37 | 0.24 |
| Playing style | Kyoto Sanga | Mito Hollyhock |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.32 | 0.33 |
| Field tilt | 0.52 | 0.34 |
| xT per match | 0.9 | 0.91 |
| xTA per match | 1.2 | 0.73 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 18 | 27 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.33 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.29 | 0.27 |
| Entries into the box per match | 14 | 13 |
| Entries into the box against | 18 | 14 |
| Pass completion % | 0.74 | 0.78 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.69 | 0.74 |
| Passes per match | 354 | 342 |
| Passes against per match | 324 | 559 |
| Switches of play per match | 23.6 | 24.4 |
| Long balls per match | 21 | 34 |
| Set pieces | Kyoto Sanga | Mito Hollyhock |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.03 | 0.2 |
| Corners per match | 2.5 | 7.3 |
| Corners against per match | 6.5 | 5.2 |
| xG per corner | 0 | 0.04 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.05 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.4 | 0.29 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.62 | 0.5 |
| Other | Kyoto Sanga | Mito Hollyhock |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.68 | 0.67 |
| The goalkeepers | Gakuji Ota (Kyoto Sanga) | Konosuke Nishikawa (Mito Hollyhock) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 7 | 9 |
| Save % | 64% | 75% |
| xG prevented | 33% | 53% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Kyoto Sanga a 46% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Kyoto Sanga 46%, draw 27%, Mito Hollyhock 27%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 46% and under at 54%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 50% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.