01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Hammarby TFF to win77%
- Over 1.5 goals88%
Swedish Ettan18°0,2 mm20 km/h
Läs på svenskaOscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work
Hammarby TFF enters this clash against Piteå as the overwhelming favorites, with a hefty 77% win probability forecasted by the model. The expected goals tell a similar story, predicting a 3.00 to 0.67 advantage for the hosts. Such a statistical gap suggests a dominant performance is on the cards, with scorelines like 2-0, 3-0, and even 4-0 appearing most probable. The possession-heavy style of Hammarby, coupled with a high press, is likely to overpower Piteå’s more controlled approach.
Despite the small head-to-head sample size, where Hammarby secured the lone victory, the substantial point and xPoints disparities are hard to ignore. Hammarby has amassed 36 points to Piteå’s mere 11, and their xPoints further underline their superiority. The hosts’ xG and xGA metrics bolster this narrative, with Hammarby creating twice as much expected goal output per match as their opponents while conceding significantly less.
However, for punters with an appetite for risk, the market does present some intriguing value opportunities. The draw is priced at 7.9 with both Betsafe and Betsson, offering a 14% edge according to the model. Meanwhile, Piteå’s victory is also valued at 13.5 with Betsafe, marrying long odds with a 13% edge. Although these outcomes are unlikely, given the game’s dynamics, they do carry a statistical edge worth considering.
As for goals, the match leans heavily towards the over 2.5 mark, with a 71% likelihood. However, it's less clear whether both teams will find the net, with that probability at 47%. Given Hammarby’s robust defensive record and Piteå’s struggles in front of goal, a clean sheet for the hosts seems more plausible.
In essence, while Hammarby should comfortably claim the points, the calculated risk for value hunters lies in betting on a draw or a surprise away win, where the odds far exceed the typical expectations.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Hammarby TFF | X | 2 · Piteå |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 1.11 | EV+ 14% 7.90 | EV+ 13% 13.50 |
| Betsson | 1.11 | EV+ 14% 7.90 | EV+ 13% 13.50 |
Odds updated 21 Aug, 10:43
Head-to-head based on Ettan data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Hammarby TFF | Piteå |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 36 | 11 |
| xPoints | 27 | 13.2 |
| xG per match | 1.7 | 0.85 |
| xGA per match | 0.83 | 2 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.31 | 0.22 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.25 | 0.44 |
| Playing style | Hammarby TFF | Piteå |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.39 | 0.33 |
| Field tilt | 0.77 | 0.38 |
| xT per match | 1.7 | 1.1 |
| xTA per match | 0.76 | 1.4 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 33 | 23 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.55 | 0.47 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.29 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.28 | 0.25 |
| Entries into the box per match | 22 | 10 |
| Entries into the box against | 8 | 17 |
| Pass completion % | 0.85 | 0.8 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.81 | 0.74 |
| Passes per match | 474 | 354 |
| Passes against per match | 276 | 400 |
| Switches of play per match | 12.6 | 16.4 |
| Long balls per match | 24 | 28 |
| Set pieces | Hammarby TFF | Piteå |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.23 | 0.12 |
| Corners per match | 5.6 | 3.4 |
| Corners against per match | 3.8 | 5.8 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.01 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.04 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.41 | 0.33 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.65 | 0.58 |
| Other | Hammarby TFF | Piteå |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.67 | 0.62 |
| The goalkeepers | Elton Fischerström Opancar (Hammarby TFF) | Filip Eriksson (Piteå) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 36 | 79 |
| Save % | 75% | 69% |
| xG prevented | 55% | 49% |
| Claims | 72 (96%) | 93 (92%) |
The model gives Hammarby TFF a 77% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Hammarby TFF 77%, draw 14%, Piteå 8%.
The model's most likely final score is 2-0 at 11% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 71% and under at 29%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 47% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.