Turkish 1. Lig27°18 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    BandırmasporBandırmasporLow block & direct
    30
    IstanbulsporIstanbulsporPossession control
    The model's lean: 1 · Bandırmaspor (40%)

    Bandırmaspor vs Istanbulspor · Turkish 1. Lig

    1 · Bandırmaspor 40%X 28%32% Istanbulspor · 2

    Analysis: BandırmasporIstanbulspor

    Anna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work

    Bandirmaspor have gone 12 matches without tasting defeat in the league, a streak that demands respect in any betting equation. Meanwhile, Istanbulspor are on a hot run of their own, with four consecutive victories lighting up their recent form. This matchup isn't just about numbers; it's a clash of styles, with Bandirmaspor's low defence and direct play meeting Istanbulspor's possession control. The tension is palpable, as each team looks to exploit the other's weaknesses.

    Bandirmaspor's home dominance, with a 62% win rate from 40 matches, sets the stage for a challenging visit from Istanbulspor. However, the head-to-head record is based on only four matches, and while Bandirmaspor leads with two wins and two draws, it's too small a sample to overshadow current form and the underlying metrics. Istanbulspor might be trailing in the league standings with 52 points against Bandirmaspor's 60, but the xPoints tilt in their favor, suggesting they've been a tad unlucky.

    Expected goals (xG) analysis presents an intriguing narrative. Bandirmaspor's xG per match at 0.96 contrasts sharply with Istanbulspor's 1.4, hinting at a potentially more clinical visiting side. Despite this, Bandirmaspor's defence edges out slightly with xGA at 1.1 compared to Istanbulspor's 1.3. The model's probabilities lean towards Bandirmaspor's victory at 40%, yet a draw at 28% and an Istanbulspor win at 32% shouldn't be dismissed lightly. The most likely scoreline of 1-1 (13%) underscores the potential for a closely contested draw.

    Weather isn't in play here, so the statistical leans are clear: a moderate 46% for over 2.5 goals and a slight edge for both teams to score at 51%. Given these metrics, a 1-1 draw feels like the most plausible outcome, with the under 2.5 goals having a fair chance. If there's a sharp angle to exploit, it's betting on the draw, especially with a bookmaker offering value odds at EV+ territory. Despite Bandirmaspor's formidable home record, Istanbulspor's current form and xG supremacy suggest they won't leave empty-handed.

    BandırmasporBandırmaspor
    Form DDWDW
    League ranking xG #18xGA #8xT #16xP/match #13Points #8
    Key players
    • Douglas Willian da Silva SouzaFxG 0.33 · xT 0.04
    • Remi MulumbaCDMxG 0.02 · xT 0.10
    • Kerim AlıcıRBxG 0.06 · xT 0.07
    IstanbulsporIstanbulspor
    Form LWWWW
    League ranking xG #9xGA #14xT #11xP/match #9Points #11
    Key players
    • Mario KrstovskiFxG 0.31 · xT 0.00
    • Alieu ChamLWxG 0.21 · xT 0.07
    • Florian LoshajCAMxG 0.19 · xT 0.13
    Final score
    30
    The model called the outcome
    Predicted probabilities: Bandırmaspor 40% · Draw 28% · Istanbulspor 32%

    Match prediction: BandırmasporIstanbulspor

    Predicted score matrix

    Istanbulspor
    Bandırmaspor
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–08.6%
    0–19.0%
    0–25.3%
    0–32.0%
    0–4+0.7%
    1
    1–010.8%
    1–113.1%
    1–27.3%
    1–32.8%
    1–4+1.0%
    2
    2–07.6%
    2–18.7%
    2–24.9%
    2–31.9%
    2–4+0.7%
    3
    3–03.4%
    3–13.9%
    3–22.2%
    3–30.9%
    3–4+0.3%
    4+
    4+–01.6%
    4+–11.8%
    4+–21.0%
    4+–30.4%
    4+–4+0.1%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-113%
    2. 2.1-011%
    3. 3.0-19%
    4. 4.2-19%
    5. 5.0-09%
    Expected goals
    1,361,14
    Both teams to score
    51%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,5
    Under 2,554%
    Over 2,546%

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Bandırmaspor or draw (1X)69%
    • Under 3.5 goals76%

    Combined probability

    52%

    Fair odds

    1.92

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Bandırmaspor or draw (1X)69%
    • Under 2.5 goals54%
    • Mamadou Fall to score20%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score51%
    • Over 2.5 goals46%
    • Abdullah Dıjlan Aydın to score21%
    • İsa Dayaklı to be booked25%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    No odds available yet.

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    4 matches
    Bandırmaspor 2Draw 2Istanbulspor 0
    Goals: 31 (⌀ 1)

    Head-to-head based on Turkish 1. Lig data since 2024.

    Key facts

    • Bandirmaspor are unbeaten in their last 12 league matches.
    • Istanbulspor come into this round on 4 straight wins.
    • Bandirmaspor win 62% of their home matches all-time (40 played).
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Bandırmaspor
    Istanbulspor
    When goals are scored and conceded 2025
    Bandırmaspor (4734)
    Istanbulspor (5755)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Bandırmaspor
    Hikmet Ciftci: 263 passningar, xT 0.74CiftciRemi Mulumba: 229 passningar, xT 0.27MulumbaAtinc Nukan: 151 passningar, xT 0.33NukanEnes Aydın: 146 passningar, xT 0.25AydınKerim Alıcı: 137 passningar, xT 0.41AlıcıArda Özçimen: 95 passningar, xT 0.05ÖzçimenMuhammed Gümüşkaya: 86 passningar, xT -0.03GümüşkayaAmidou Badji: 77 passningar, xT 0.01BadjiJoão Pedro Reis Amaral: 67 passningar, xT 0.23AmaralMucahid Albayrak: 54 passningar, xT -0.04AlbayrakEmirhan Acar: 51 passningar, xT 0.01Acar
    Istanbulspor
    Alp Tutar: 183 passningar, xT 0.22TutarEmrecan Uzunhan: 161 passningar, xT 0.18UzunhanDuran Şahin: 158 passningar, xT 0.18ŞahinModestas Vorobjovas: 156 passningar, xT 0.26VorobjovasYusuf Ozer: 151 passningar, xT 0.84OzerDemeaco Duhaney: 140 passningar, xT 0.67DuhaneyAlieu Cham: 104 passningar, xT 0.53ChamVefa Temel: 96 passningar, xT 0.11TemelPhellipe Cardoso Araújo: 84 passningar, xT 0.63AraújoIsa Dayakli: 67 passningar, xT 0.13DayakliÖmer Faruk Duymaz: 67 passningar, xT 0.27Duymaz
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Bandırmaspor
    Hikmet Ciftci: 263 passningar, xT 0.74CiftciRemi Mulumba: 229 passningar, xT 0.27MulumbaAtinc Nukan: 151 passningar, xT 0.33NukanEnes Aydın: 146 passningar, xT 0.25AydınKerim Alıcı: 137 passningar, xT 0.41AlıcıArda Özçimen: 95 passningar, xT 0.05ÖzçimenMuhammed Gümüşkaya: 86 passningar, xT -0.03GümüşkayaAmidou Badji: 77 passningar, xT 0.01BadjiJoão Pedro Reis Amaral: 67 passningar, xT 0.23AmaralMucahid Albayrak: 54 passningar, xT -0.04AlbayrakEmirhan Acar: 51 passningar, xT 0.01Acar
    Istanbulspor
    Alp Tutar: 183 passningar, xT 0.22TutarEmrecan Uzunhan: 161 passningar, xT 0.18UzunhanDuran Şahin: 158 passningar, xT 0.18ŞahinModestas Vorobjovas: 156 passningar, xT 0.26VorobjovasYusuf Ozer: 151 passningar, xT 0.84OzerDemeaco Duhaney: 140 passningar, xT 0.67DuhaneyAlieu Cham: 104 passningar, xT 0.53ChamVefa Temel: 96 passningar, xT 0.11TemelPhellipe Cardoso Araújo: 84 passningar, xT 0.63AraújoIsa Dayakli: 67 passningar, xT 0.13DayakliÖmer Faruk Duymaz: 67 passningar, xT 0.27Duymaz

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceBandırmasporIstanbulspor
    Points6052
    xPoints50.355.3
    xG per match0.961.4
    xGA per match1.11.3
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.180.25
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.180.2
    Playing styleBandırmasporIstanbulspor
    Build-up efficiency0.30.33
    Field tilt0.420.47
    xT per match0.870.94
    xTA per match0.950.93
    Won balls, offensive half2322
    Pressing intensity0.220.21
    Pressing efficiency0.280.28
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.310.33
    Entries into the box per match1010
    Entries into the box against1211
    Pass completion %0.750.75
    Pass completion % under pressure0.70.71
    Passes per match286319
    Passes against per match360352
    Switches of play per match20.324.1
    Long balls per match2732
    Set piecesBandırmasporIstanbulspor
    xG from free kicks0.070.09
    Corners per match43.6
    Corners against per match5.34.8
    xG per corner0.050.07
    xGA per corner against0.030.05
    First touch, offensive corners %0.460.46
    First touch, defensive corners %0.50.48
    OtherBandırmasporIstanbulspor
    Throw-in control0.640.72
    The goalkeepersArda Özçimen (Bandırmaspor)Isa Dogan (Istanbulspor)
    Saves8951
    Save %80%64%
    xG prevented59%45%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Bandırmaspor vs Istanbulspor according to our model?

    The model gives Bandırmaspor a 40% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Bandırmaspor 40%, draw 28%, Istanbulspor 32%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 46% and under at 54%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 51% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.