- Hem
- Champions League
Champions League: Predictions, Odds & Tips
Läs på svenskaThe Champions League is the oddsmakers' hardest competition: teams from leagues that never meet, qualifying specialists against domestic giants, and rotation the market prices late. The model compares every side on one scale regardless of home league — strength, form, playing style and squad combined into 1X2 probabilities, a score matrix and goal lines for every European night.
Cross-league ties are exactly where the market is most unsure — and where positive expected value (EV+) most often appears. Every prediction is graded openly at full time, hit or miss.
Upcoming matches
–
League table2026/27
| Pos | Team | P | S | W–D–L | GF–GA | xP | xG | xGA | xGD | FT | Style |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | 7 | 4–3–0 | 9–4 | 13,6 | 11,5 | 4,8 | +6,7 | 55 % | Counter-attacks & crosses | |
| 2 | 9 | 4 | 3–0–1 | 9–8 | 5,4 | 7,0 | 6,7 | +0,3 | 60 % | Possession & high press | |
| 3 | 7 | 3 | 2–1–0 | 5–0 | 5,3 | 6,0 | 3,0 | +3,0 | 50 % | Balanced & physical | |
| 4 | 6 | 4 | 2–0–2 | 6–3 | 6,2 | 6,7 | 6,4 | +0,3 | 35 % | Low block & direct | |
| 5 | Sabah | 6 | 5 | 2–0–3 | 11–10 | 6,2 | 8,0 | 8,7 | −0,7 | 48 % | Possession & high press |
| 6 | 6 | 4 | 2–0–2 | 7–10 | 4,8 | 5,1 | 7,2 | −2,1 | 34 % | Counter-attacks & crosses | |
| 7 | 5 | 4 | 1–2–1 | 7–8 | 5,2 | 7,3 | 4,7 | +2,6 | 79 % | Possession & high press | |
| 8 | 4 | 4 | 1–1–2 | 6–5 | 6,1 | 5,9 | 4,4 | +1,5 | 56 % | Counter-attacks & crosses | |
| 9 | 4 | 2 | 1–1–0 | 3–2 | 3,5 | 4,1 | 3,0 | +1,1 | 55 % | Possession & high press | |
| 10 | 4 | 3 | 1–1–1 | 6–6 | 3,3 | 3,7 | 6,9 | −3,2 | 26 % | Low block & direct | |
| 11 | 4 | 3 | 1–1–1 | 1–4 | 2,9 | 2,4 | 5,5 | −3,1 | 40 % | Balanced & physical | |
| 12 | 4 | 3 | 1–1–1 | 4–8 | 3,2 | 3,6 | 7,9 | −4,3 | 30 % | Possession control | |
| 13 | 4 | 4 | 1–1–2 | 3–7 | 5,4 | 5,4 | 5,5 | −0,1 | 41 % | Counter-attacks & crosses | |
| 14 | 3 | 1 | 1–0–0 | 6–1 | 2,6 | 4,8 | 0,7 | +4,1 | 87 % | Possession & high press | |
| 15 | 3 | 1 | 1–0–0 | 5–0 | 2,5 | 2,9 | 0,3 | +2,6 | 79 % | Possession & high press | |
| 16 | 3 | 1 | 1–0–0 | 5–1 | 1,7 | 2,4 | 0,6 | +1,8 | 83 % | Possession & high press | |
| 17 | 3 | 1 | 1–0–0 | 4–0 | 2,7 | 3,5 | 0,5 | +3,0 | 73 % | Possession & high press | |
| 18 | 3 | 1 | 1–0–0 | 4–1 | 2,1 | 2,1 | 1,1 | +1,0 | 54 % | Balanced & physical | |
| 19 | 3 | 1 | 1–0–0 | 3–1 | 2,1 | 2,3 | 0,7 | +1,6 | 70 % | Possession control | |
| 20 | 3 | 1 | 1–0–0 | 3–1 | 1,8 | 1,5 | 2,0 | −0,5 | 38 % | Low block & direct | |
| 21 | 3 | 1 | 1–0–0 | 2–0 | 2,5 | 2,9 | 0,2 | +2,7 | 85 % | Possession & high press | |
| 22 | 3 | 1 | 1–0–0 | 3–2 | 2,3 | 2,6 | 1,7 | +0,9 | 29 % | Low block & direct | |
| 23 | 3 | 1 | 1–0–0 | 3–2 | 0,7 | 1,7 | 1,9 | −0,2 | 67 % | Possession control | |
| 24 | 3 | 1 | 1–0–0 | 3–2 | 1,7 | 1,7 | 0,8 | +0,9 | 67 % | Balanced & physical | |
| 25 | 3 | 1 | 1–0–0 | 3–2 | 2,4 | 2,9 | 1,3 | +1,6 | 73 % | Possession & high press | |
| 26 | 3 | 1 | 1–0–0 | 2–1 | 1,8 | 1,4 | 0,6 | +0,8 | 52 % | Possession & high press | |
| 27 | 3 | 1 | 1–0–0 | 2–1 | 2,7 | 3,3 | 1,6 | +1,7 | 21 % | Low block & direct | |
| 28 | 3 | 1 | 1–0–0 | 1–0 | 2,8 | 3,8 | 0,2 | +3,6 | 90 % | Possession & high press | |
| 29 | 3 | 2 | 1–0–1 | 5–5 | 3,1 | 3,4 | 2,7 | +0,7 | 60 % | Possession control | |
| 30 | 3 | 3 | 1–0–2 | 5–5 | 5,4 | 7,2 | 3,1 | +4,1 | 56 % | Low block & direct | |
| 31 | 3 | 2 | 1–0–1 | 4–5 | 1,3 | 1,5 | 6,0 | −4,5 | 43 % | Possession control | |
| 32 | 3 | 2 | 1–0–1 | 4–6 | 2,6 | 2,9 | 3,4 | −0,5 | 59 % | Possession & high press | |
| 33 | 3 | 2 | 1–0–1 | 2–4 | 1,6 | 1,8 | 3,8 | −2,0 | 37 % | Possession & high press | |
| 34 | 1 | 1 | 0–1–0 | 1–1 | 0,6 | 0,4 | 0,9 | −0,5 | 79 % | Possession & high press | |
| 35 | 1 | 1 | 0–1–0 | 1–1 | 1,4 | 0,6 | 0,5 | +0,1 | 63 % | Possession control | |
| 36 | 1 | 1 | 0–1–0 | 1–1 | 1,1 | 0,5 | 0,6 | −0,1 | 37 % | Possession control | |
| 37 | 1 | 2 | 0–1–1 | 3–4 | 3,3 | 1,8 | 2,9 | −1,1 | 19 % | Low block & direct | |
| 38 | Győri ETO | 1 | 2 | 0–1–1 | 2–3 | 2,2 | 3,0 | 4,1 | −1,1 | 45 % | Low block & direct |
| 39 | Celje | 1 | 2 | 0–1–1 | 2–3 | 2,6 | 3,4 | 2,8 | +0,6 | 52 % | Possession control |
| 40 | 1 | 2 | 0–1–1 | 1–2 | 1,4 | 0,8 | 4,0 | −3,2 | 28 % | Low block & direct | |
| 41 | 1 | 2 | 0–1–1 | 1–2 | 2,0 | 1,7 | 2,8 | −1,1 | 45 % | Balanced & physical | |
| 42 | 0 | 1 | 0–0–1 | 2–3 | 0,6 | 1,7 | 2,6 | −0,9 | 71 % | Possession & high press | |
| 43 | 0 | 1 | 0–0–1 | 2–3 | 2,1 | 1,9 | 1,7 | +0,2 | 33 % | Low block & direct | |
| 44 | 0 | 1 | 0–0–1 | 2–3 | 1,2 | 1,4 | 2,4 | −1,0 | 18 % | Low block & direct | |
| 45 | 0 | 1 | 0–0–1 | 2–3 | 1,0 | 0,8 | 1,7 | −0,9 | 33 % | Balanced & physical | |
| 46 | 0 | 1 | 0–0–1 | 2–3 | 0,4 | 1,3 | 2,9 | −1,6 | 27 % | Counter-attacks & crosses | |
| 47 | 0 | 1 | 0–0–1 | 1–2 | 0,2 | 1,6 | 3,3 | −1,7 | 79 % | Possession & high press | |
| 48 | 0 | 1 | 0–0–1 | 1–2 | 0,9 | 0,6 | 1,4 | −0,8 | 48 % | Counter-attacks & crosses | |
| 49 | 0 | 1 | 0–0–1 | 0–1 | 0,2 | 0,2 | 3,8 | −3,6 | 10 % | Counter-attacks & crosses | |
| 50 | Kairat Almaty | 0 | 1 | 0–0–1 | 0–1 | 1,9 | 1,3 | 0,4 | +0,9 | 74 % | Possession & high press |
| 51 | 0 | 1 | 0–0–1 | 1–3 | 1,0 | 2,0 | 1,5 | +0,5 | 62 % | Possession & high press | |
| 52 | 0 | 1 | 0–0–1 | 0–2 | 0,4 | 0,2 | 2,9 | −2,7 | 15 % | Low block & direct | |
| 53 | 0 | 1 | 0–0–1 | 1–4 | 0,7 | 1,1 | 2,1 | −1,0 | 46 % | Balanced & physical | |
| 54 | 0 | 1 | 0–0–1 | 1–5 | 1,0 | 0,6 | 2,4 | −1,8 | 17 % | Low block & direct | |
| 55 | 0 | 2 | 0–0–2 | 0–6 | 0,8 | 2,5 | 5,2 | −2,7 | 73 % | Possession control |
Latest articles
All articles
2026-09-10 · 1 min
This week's pool play 10/9: locks and upsets
The article presents xG-based analyses of several football matches recurring in various Swedish pool betting games (Stryktipset, Europatipset, Flextipset, etc.), where Fenerbahçe–Roma stands out the most with a clear difference between the public's tips (27%) and the statistical model's assessment (41% home win). Other matches highlighted are Como–RB Leipzig (47% home win thanks to Como's rising form), Manchester United–Sabah (67% home win, the most one-sided match) as well as Slavia Praha–Lens and Stevenage–Luton Town, where the statistics reveal interesting deviations from general expectations

2026-09-09 · 2 min
**Today's banker 9/9: 1 in PSV Eindhoven – Shakhtar Donetsk**
PSV Eindhoven is the big favorite ahead of the meeting with Shakhtar Donetsk in the Champions League, with odds of 1.45 for a home win and significantly higher expected goals (2.6 vs 1.2) pointing to a dominant and high-scoring match. Guus Berend Til and Ruben van Bommel are singled out as PSV's main goal threats, while Shakhtar's Kauã Elias Nogueira and Lucas dos Santos Ferreira are expected to have a tough time against the Dutch team's offensive pressure and defensive play.

2026-09-08 · 4 min
Alma and Hulda prefer surprises with a rating of 8 out of 9
The article analyzes five football matches where statistics such as xG, possession, and pressing deviate from what the odds on the betting slip suggest, focusing on Fenerbahce–Roma, Sochaux–Nantes, and AZ Alkmaar–Willem II as examples. Throughout, it is argued that the market often undervalues even matches or teams that hold their own despite being at a disadvantage, which provides value in the odds even though the numbers point to a clear favorite.
Played matches
Prediction track recordHow the predictions work
Every prediction comes from PlaymakerAI's match model — the same data platform professional clubs use for scouting and match analysis. The model is trained on event data from hundreds of thousands of matches and weighs over 200 factors per team: strength ratings, current form, playing style, squad player profiles, fixture congestion, travel and even matchday weather.
For each fixture the model produces a full goal distribution. From it we derive the 1X2 probabilities, the score matrix, expected goals, over/under lines and both-teams-to-score. Predictions are frozen before kickoff and never changed afterwards — once a match finishes we grade it openly, hit or miss.
Odds are collected continuously from several bookmakers. When the model's probability for an outcome exceeds what the odds imply, we flag it as value (EV+). That is the model's assessment, not a guarantee: even positive-EV bets lose often. Gamble responsibly.
Champions League FAQ
Where do I find Champions League predictions?
Right here: every match in the Champions League has its own analysis with 1X2 probabilities, most likely scoreline, over/under and value against current odds. Pick a match from the upcoming list — predictions are refreshed before every round and graded openly afterwards.
How are the Champions League predictions made?
Each match is replayed thousands of times in the model using hundreds of metrics per team — expected goals, pressing, expected threat, field tilt, form and squad. The output is a probability for every scoreline, which is then compared with bookmaker odds to find value.
What is the xP table?
xP means expected points: how many points each team should have taken given the quality of chances created and conceded. The gap between xP and the real table shows which the Champions League teams are over- and underrated right now.
Which teams play in Champions League 2026/27?
Champions League 2026/27 has 24 teams: Fenerbahçe, Bodø/Glimt, AEK Athens, Sturm Graz, Sabah, AGF, Dinamo Zagreb, Lyon, Vikingur Reykjavik, Viking, Levski Sofia, Slovan Bratislava, NEC, Paris Saint-Germain, Bayern München, FC Barcelona, Manchester United, Como, VfB Stuttgart, Sporting CP, Manchester City, Aston Villa, Lens, Real Betis.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.
Sabah
Győri ETO
Celje
Kairat Almaty