01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Twente to win59%
- Over 1.5 goals84%
Conference League
Läs på svenskaOscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work
In their recent encounters, a small sample of just two games shows Qarabağ and Twente each securing a win against the other. This head-to-head record lacks the depth to serve as a strong predictor and should weigh less in our analysis than current form and expected goals. What stands out is that both teams have a preference for possession and a high press, setting the stage for a tactical battle.
Looking at form and stats, Twente clearly has the upper hand. Their expected goals per match (xG) stand at an impressive 2.7, significantly higher than Qarabağ's 1.1. The visitors also boast a better defensive record, with an expected goals against (xGA) of just 0.86 compared to the hosts' 1.1. While Qarabağ holds a slight edge in points, Twente's underlying metrics suggest they have been more efficient and are perhaps unlucky to sit behind in the standings.
The probability model leans heavily in favor of Twente, giving them a 59% chance of victory compared to Qarabağ's 22%. The expected goals model aligns with these probabilities, forecasting a 1-2 or 0-2 outcome as quite probable. Goals seem likely, with a 63% chance of over 2.5 goals and a 61% chance that both teams find the net, suggesting a dynamic and open game.
For bettors, Twente presents value at odds of 1.85 with Unibet. The model's confidence in a Twente win surpasses what the current odds imply, marking this as an attractive opportunity. Ending this on a note of caution, nothing is guaranteed in football, but the numbers point decisively towards the visitors extending their dominance.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
No odds available yet.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Qarabağ | Twente |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 3 | 2 |
| xPoints | 2.1 | 4.2 |
| xG per match | 1.1 | 2.7 |
| xGA per match | 1.1 | 0.86 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.19 | 0.26 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.36 | 0.2 |
| Playing style | Qarabağ | Twente |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.33 | 0.31 |
| Field tilt | 0.63 | 0.73 |
| xT per match | 0.86 | 1.3 |
| xTA per match | 0.38 | 0.48 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 25 | 28 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.25 | 0.2 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.3 | 0.25 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.34 | 0.21 |
| Entries into the box per match | 12 | 16 |
| Entries into the box against | 11 | 9 |
| Pass completion % | 0.81 | 0.84 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.73 | 0.79 |
| Passes per match | 420 | 508 |
| Passes against per match | 238 | 300 |
| Switches of play per match | 18.5 | 52.6 |
| Long balls per match | 22 | 52 |
| Set pieces | Qarabağ | Twente |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.05 | 0.4 |
| Corners per match | 7.1 | 9.7 |
| Corners against per match | 4.7 | 4.1 |
| xG per corner | 0.01 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.09 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.53 | 0.37 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.3 | 0.62 |
| Other | Qarabağ | Twente |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.71 | 0.76 |
| The goalkeepers | Martin Zlomislić (Qarabağ) | Joël Drommel (Twente) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 4 | 6 |
| Save % | 100% | 67% |
| xG prevented | 100% | 36% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Twente a 59% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Qarabağ 22%, draw 19%, Twente 59%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 10% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 63% and under at 37%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 61% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.