01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Anderlecht to win62%
- Over 1.5 goals76%
Belgian Pro LeagueLotto Park, Bryssel14°14,1 mm22 km/h
Läs på svenskaAnna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work
The tension in this matchup between Anderlecht and Zulte Waregem lies in the contrasting narratives that the statistics tell. Though the model strongly leans towards a home victory at 62%, it's Zulte Waregem's unbeaten streak of 12 league matches that adds a layer of intrigue. While Anderlecht boasts a robust home win rate of 57%, this head-to-head series is young, with just two encounters since 2023, each side having tasted victory once. As such, the small sample size diminishes the weight of their direct history compared to current form and expected goals.
Anderlecht's style revolves around possession and a high press, an approach that typically yields them a 1.8 expected goals tally. On the other hand, the visitors are no strangers to controlling possession themselves, though their expected goals tally sits at a relatively modest 0.94. This suggests that the hosts could dictate the game's tempo, yet Zulte Waregem's ability to maintain discipline and structure shouldn't be underestimated. The draw and a narrow away win remain plausible outcomes, given that Zulte edges Anderlecht on points.
The model suggests a slight lean towards over 2.5 goals at 52%, with both teams scoring at 51%. Although Anderlecht's expected goals against is a mere 0.8, Zulte's offensive tenacity and unbeaten streak suggest they could find the net. The most likely scorelines—1-0, 1-1, and 2-0—underline a potential home victory, yet they don't write off a tightly contested affair.
Betting markets present an intriguing opportunity. The 11% likelihood of both a 1-0 and 1-1 scoreline implies a potential edge for bettors, though no specific odds data supports a particular bookmaker selection here.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
No odds available yet.
Head-to-head based on Belgian Pro League data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Anderlecht | Zulte Waregem |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 7 | 11 |
| xPoints | 7.9 | 8.1 |
| xG per match | 1.6 | 1.3 |
| xGA per match | 0.8 | 1 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.29 | 0.32 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.09 | 0.06 |
| Playing style | Anderlecht | Zulte Waregem |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.3 | 0.34 |
| Field tilt | 0.77 | 0.43 |
| xT per match | 1.8 | 0.9 |
| xTA per match | 0.74 | 1.1 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 31 | 30 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.32 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.29 | 0.16 |
| Entries into the box per match | 26 | 13 |
| Entries into the box against | 10 | 11 |
| Pass completion % | 0.79 | 0.71 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.74 | 0.63 |
| Passes per match | 481 | 279 |
| Passes against per match | 303 | 449 |
| Switches of play per match | 24.2 | 18.9 |
| Long balls per match | 27 | 27 |
| Set pieces | Anderlecht | Zulte Waregem |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.02 | 0.13 |
| Corners per match | 7.2 | 4.7 |
| Corners against per match | 2 | 5.3 |
| xG per corner | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.09 | 0.04 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.71 | 0.46 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.5 | 0.59 |
| Other | Anderlecht | Zulte Waregem |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.76 | 0.69 |
| The goalkeepers | Colin Coosemans (Anderlecht) | Louis Bostyn (Zulte Waregem) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 9 | 16 |
| Save % | 64% | 84% |
| xG prevented | 63% | 63% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Anderlecht a 62% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Anderlecht 62%, draw 22%, Zulte Waregem 16%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-0 at 11% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 52% and under at 48%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 51% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.