01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Beveren to win54%
- Over 1.5 goals76%
Belgian Pro LeagueFreethiel Stadion, Beveren11°7,2 mm25 km/h
Läs på svenska
BeverenBalanced & physical
LommelCounter-attacks & crosses18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Sofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work
The visitors, on the other hand, come to the game with a counter-attacking style that could exploit any lapses in Beveren's defense. Lommel's defense has been marginally better, conceding an xGA of 1.9 per match against Beveren's 2.0. Still, recent form combined with expected goals becomes more telling than raw points totals.
The model gives Beveren a 54% chance of victory, highlighting them as the favorites, although not overwhelmingly so. The expected goals suggest a Beveren scoreline advantage, but both teams have over 50% chances to find the net. Most likely outcomes cluster around low-scoring results: 1-1, 1-0, and 2-1.
Weather conditions—rain at 13.2°C—could suppress the goal count, dampening both sides' attacking ambitions. This aligns with the model's over/under prediction, as the edge lies with the under 2.5 goals at odds of 2.1 offered by LeoVegas. Rated at 48%, the under presents a slight edge in expected value, making it a considered play in a matchup where defensive solidity might just overshadow offensive flair.
As kickoff approaches, the smart money might lean towards a narrow victory for Beveren or a draw, with the under 2.5 goals holding the sharpest angle in this weather-affected, tactical battle.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Beveren | X | 2 · Lommel |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 1.82 | 3.60 | 4.10 |
| LeoVegas | 1.83 | 3.60 | 3.75 |
| Nordicbet | 1.82 | 3.60 | 4.10 |
Odds updated 3 Oct, 06:36
1.88 → 1.82
3.60 → 3.60
3.90 → 4.10
1.68 → 1.63
Nordicbet · 4 recorded price levels · 02/10/2026 → 03/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Beveren | Lommel |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 9 | 8 |
| xPoints | 7.4 | 7.6 |
| xG per match | 1.2 | 0.98 |
| xGA per match | 2 | 1.9 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.21 | 0.1 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.45 | 0.3 |
| Playing style | Beveren | Lommel |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.31 | 0.31 |
| Field tilt | 0.43 | 0.3 |
| xT per match | 1.1 | 0.61 |
| xTA per match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 26 | 19 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.25 | 0.26 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.28 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.21 | 0.18 |
| Entries into the box per match | 13 | 8 |
| Entries into the box against | 18 | 20 |
| Pass completion % | 0.75 | 0.77 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.69 | 0.74 |
| Passes per match | 399 | 355 |
| Passes against per match | 411 | 442 |
| Switches of play per match | 26.7 | 23.4 |
| Long balls per match | 40 | 33 |
| Set pieces | Beveren | Lommel |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.02 | 0.07 |
| Corners per match | 4.5 | 3.4 |
| Corners against per match | 4.6 | 7.4 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.04 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.45 | 0.58 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.39 | 0.54 |
| Other | Beveren | Lommel |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.77 | 0.69 |
| The goalkeepers | Johannes Schenk (Beveren) | Matthias Pieklak (Lommel) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 23 | 25 |
| Save % | 70% | 78% |
| xG prevented | 43% | 78% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Beveren a 54% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Beveren 54%, draw 27%, Lommel 19%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 52% and under at 48%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 53% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Hämta bonus
Se ComeOns villkor
Hämta bonus
Se Hajpers villkor
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.