01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Nordsjælland or draw (X2)69%
- Over 1.5 goals79%
Danish SuperligaEnergi Viborg Arena, Viborg12°15,3 mm29 km/h
Läs på svenskaSofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work
FC Nordsjælland's high-octane pressing system faces a tactical challenge against Viborg's counter-attacking prowess. The model's lean towards the visitors is reinforced by their superior xG rate of 2.2 per match compared to Viborg's 1.5. This attacking efficiency, coupled with the expected rain, suggests that Nordsjælland may still find the back of the net more frequently.
Historically, the head-to-head record since 2022 is evenly split at three wins each, which is statistically significant given the sample size of six matches. However, Nordsjælland's slight edge in both points and xPoints this season underscores their current form advantage. Viborg’s strategy will revolve around exploiting transitional moments, a method that has previously yielded success against Nordsjælland's high line.
Goals are expected, with a 56% probability for over 2.5 goals and a 59% chance of both teams scoring. The weather forecast of rain could dampen scoring chances slightly, and these conditions are already factored into the model's projections. The most probable scorelines of 1-1 and 1-2 indicate a tightly contested match, though the visitors' attacking depth could tip the scales.
For those seeking value, Unibet offers 2.45 on FC Nordsjælland to win, aligning with the model's 41% win probability for the visitors. This represents a potential edge given their current form and tactical acumen. Expect a closely fought battle, but the numbers favor Nordsjælland edging it, with 1-2 the most fitting scoreline.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
No odds available yet.
Head-to-head based on Danish Superliga data since 2022.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Viborg | Nordsjælland |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 13 | 14 |
| xPoints | 11.7 | 12.3 |
| xG per match | 1.5 | 2.2 |
| xGA per match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.26 | 0.34 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.22 | 0.17 |
| Playing style | Viborg | Nordsjælland |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.31 | 0.34 |
| Field tilt | 0.43 | 0.58 |
| xT per match | 1.1 | 1.5 |
| xTA per match | 0.89 | 0.88 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 23 | 27 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.27 | 0.27 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.22 | 0.23 |
| Entries into the box per match | 15 | 19 |
| Entries into the box against | 11 | 11 |
| Pass completion % | 0.78 | 0.82 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.73 | 0.77 |
| Passes per match | 381 | 528 |
| Passes against per match | 402 | 369 |
| Switches of play per match | 31.9 | 23.8 |
| Long balls per match | 32 | 33 |
| Set pieces | Viborg | Nordsjælland |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.03 | 0.09 |
| Corners per match | 4.9 | 6.2 |
| Corners against per match | 6.5 | 3.8 |
| xG per corner | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.24 | 0.44 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.64 | 0.62 |
| Other | Viborg | Nordsjælland |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.66 | 0.78 |
| The goalkeepers | Kasper Hartly Kiilerich (Viborg) | Andreas Hansen (Nordsjælland) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 21 | 22 |
| Save % | 78% | 79% |
| xG prevented | 49% | 50% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Nordsjælland a 41% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Viborg 31%, draw 27%, Nordsjælland 41%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 56% and under at 44%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 59% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.