01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Heracles Almelo or draw (X2)63%
- Over 1.5 goals78%
Eerste Divisie16°18 km/h
Läs på svenskaAnna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work
Heracles Almelo's xG per match stands at an imposing 3.1 compared to Jong Utrecht's 0.81, underscoring a stark contrast in attacking prowess. This disparity is mirrored in their points tally, with the visitors securing a perfect 6 compared to the hosts' zero. Heracles' robust counter-attacking style coupled with effective cross utilization squares off against Utrecht's possession-focused approach, setting the stage for a tactical clash.
While the model gives Heracles a 43% chance of victory, the most frequent predicted scoreline, 1-1, at 12%, suggests a closer contest than their current form might imply. Both teams to score is pegged at 58%, hinting at potential defensive lapses on both sides. Despite Heracles' superior xGA of 1.1 against Utrecht's 2.1, the expected goals tally is almost evenly matched, with Utrecht at 1.42 and Heracles at 1.41.
The real intrigue lies in the value bets available. Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet all offer enticing odds of 4.9 for a Jong Utrecht win, a significant overlay since the model rates it at a 31% likelihood, presenting a 53% edge. This makes a punt on the hosts an appealing gamble in a matchup where the numbers hint at possible surprise outcomes.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Jong Utrecht | X | 2 · Heracles Almelo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | EV+ 53% 4.90 | EV+ 7% 4.15 | 1.58 |
| Betsson | EV+ 53% 4.90 | EV+ 7% 4.15 | 1.58 |
| Nordicbet | EV+ 53% 4.90 | EV+ 7% 4.15 | 1.58 |
Odds updated 19 Aug, 05:37
Market signal
The market has moved clearly towards an Heracles Almelo win since 17 August — the odds have shortened from 1.80 to 1.58 (−12%).
3.95 → 4.90
3.60 → 4.15
1.80 → 1.58
1.52 → 1.44
Betsson · 10 recorded price levels · 17/08/2026 → 19/08/2026 · fixed scale 10 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Jong Utrecht | Heracles Almelo |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 0 | 6 |
| xPoints | 1.8 | 4.2 |
| xG per match | 0.81 | 3.1 |
| xGA per match | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.09 | 0.66 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.59 | 0.2 |
| Playing style | Jong Utrecht | Heracles Almelo |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.28 | 0.3 |
| Field tilt | 0.29 | 0.73 |
| xT per match | 0.86 | 1.9 |
| xTA per match | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 21 | 33 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.26 | 0.22 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.27 | 0.39 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.29 | 0.33 |
| Entries into the box per match | 11 | 16 |
| Entries into the box against | 16 | 12 |
| Pass completion % | 0.68 | 0.73 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.63 | 0.64 |
| Passes per match | 235 | 323 |
| Passes against per match | 410 | 233 |
| Switches of play per match | 24.4 | 25.1 |
| Long balls per match | 33 | 42 |
| Set pieces | Jong Utrecht | Heracles Almelo |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.03 | 0 |
| Corners per match | 4 | 7.9 |
| Corners against per match | 3 | 5.4 |
| xG per corner | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.75 | 0.5 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.67 | 0.45 |
| Other | Jong Utrecht | Heracles Almelo |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.57 | 0.8 |
| The goalkeepers | Mees Eppink (Jong Utrecht) | Fabian de Keijzer (Heracles Almelo) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 6 | 4 |
| Save % | 75% | 44% |
| xG prevented | 77% | 16% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Heracles Almelo a 43% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Jong Utrecht 31%, draw 26%, Heracles Almelo 43%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 54% and under at 46%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 58% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.