01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Cambridge United to win49%
- Over 1.5 goals78%
EFL League OneAbbey Stadium, Cambridge12°1,0 mm23 km/h
Läs på svenska18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Oscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work
TEXT: Cambridge United's unbeaten run in their last five league matches contrasts sharply with Blackpool's struggle for form, reflected in their eight points compared to the hosts' thirteen. Despite Blackpool's possession-focused style, the model strongly favors the home side with a 49% chance of victory. Key metrics show Cambridge's ability to consistently find the net, scoring in 12 consecutive league outings, while the visitors have done so in 11.
Expected goals provide further insight, with Cambridge posting an xG of 1.73 against Blackpool's 1.12, suggesting the home side might edge the offensive battle. The odds of over 2.5 goals sit at 54%, hinting at a likely open game despite Cambridge's lower defensive profile. The most frequent predicted scoreline is a 1-1 draw at 12%, but a 1-0 or 2-1 win for Cambridge isn't far behind, both at 10%.
The model's lean towards Cambridge at 49% implies a reasonable favorite, though no specific bookmaker odds are available to assess value. Blackpool's head-to-head edge is too slim and recent to override current forms and expectations. Expect Cambridge to capitalize on their momentum and edge this contest, likely by a 2-1 margin.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
| Bookmaker | 1 · Cambridge United | X | 2 · Blackpool |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 2.05 | 3.45 | 3.20 |
| LeoVegas | 1.98 | 3.50 | 3.25 |
| Nordicbet | 2.05 | 3.45 | 3.20 |
Odds updated 2 Oct, 10:36
1.98 → 2.05
3.60 → 3.45
3.35 → 3.20
1.65 → 1.65
Nordicbet · 3 recorded price levels · 02/10/2026 → 02/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on League One data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Cambridge United | Blackpool |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 13 | 8 |
| xPoints | 11.2 | 9.7 |
| xG per match | 1.2 | 1.9 |
| xGA per match | 1.4 | 2.1 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.23 | 0.38 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.31 | 0.28 |
| Playing style | Cambridge United | Blackpool |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.36 | 0.32 |
| Field tilt | 0.49 | 0.43 |
| xT per match | 0.79 | 0.84 |
| xTA per match | 1 | 1.6 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 28 | 23 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.25 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.34 | 0.32 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.31 | 0.32 |
| Entries into the box per match | 13 | 14 |
| Entries into the box against | 13 | 16 |
| Pass completion % | 0.62 | 0.7 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.63 | 0.64 |
| Passes per match | 251 | 292 |
| Passes against per match | 325 | 322 |
| Switches of play per match | 17.5 | 18 |
| Long balls per match | 28 | 25 |
| Set pieces | Cambridge United | Blackpool |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.07 | 0.13 |
| Corners per match | 6.2 | 4.6 |
| Corners against per match | 4.1 | 8 |
| xG per corner | 0.02 | 0.06 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.04 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.42 | 0.44 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.73 | 0.54 |
| Other | Cambridge United | Blackpool |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.68 | 0.7 |
| The goalkeepers | Jake Eastwood (Cambridge United) | Bailey Peacock Farrell (Blackpool) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 21 | 35 |
| Save % | 66% | 75% |
| xG prevented | 45% | 54% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Cambridge United a 49% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Cambridge United 49%, draw 27%, Blackpool 25%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 54% and under at 46%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 56% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Hämta bonus
Se ComeOns villkor
Hämta bonus
Se Hajpers villkor
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.