EFL League OneHillsborough, Sheffield14°5,8 mm19 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Sheffield WednesdaySheffield WednesdayPossession control
    vs
    Cambridge UnitedCambridge UnitedLow block & direct
    The model's lean: 1 · Sheffield Wednesday (43%)

    Sheffield Wednesday vs Cambridge United · EFL League One

    1 · Sheffield Wednesday 43%X 25%32% Cambridge United · 2

    Bet on this match

    BetssonFå ett 250 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4!Claim the bonus at Betsson
    NordicbetVälkommen in i matchen! Skapa ett konto, gör en insättning och hämta ett gratisspel värt 100 kr plus 50 freespins på Pirots 4.Claim the bonus at Nordicbet
    BetsafeHämta ett 100 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4 när du gör din första insättning hos Betsafe!Claim the bonus at Betsafe

    18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links

    Analysis: Sheffield Wednesday – Cambridge United

    Sofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work

    Sheffield Wednesday's unbeaten streak of five matches stands out as a testament to their recent form. Their style of possession control aligns well with their xG of 2.0 per match, suggesting an ability to create significant scoring opportunities. The visitors, on the other hand, have managed to find the net in 11 consecutive league matches, a streak that complements their direct approach. However, their xG of only 1.1 per match and a higher xGA of 1.5 reveal vulnerabilities, particularly against a team that can dominate possession and create chances.

    The model gives a slight edge to Wednesday, with a 43% win probability compared to Cambridge's 32%. This tilt is further supported by the expected goals: 1.51 for the hosts and 1.14 for the visitors. While the historical head-to-head data is too limited to influence this analysis significantly, Wednesday's superior xPoints and xGA figures suggest they have the upper hand. The most likely scorelines, a tight 1-1 or a narrow 1-0 win for the hosts, reflect the model's cautious optimism towards Wednesday.

    For those eyeing a betting angle, Sheffield Wednesday to win at odds around 2.3 offers potential value, based on their stronger underlying metrics. The over/under 2.5 goals remains finely poised at 50%, but given the trends, a 1-1 draw or slim home victory seems the prudent call.

    Sheffield WednesdaySheffield Wednesday
    Form WWWDD
    League ranking xG #3xGA #7xT #9xP/match #4Points #2
    Key players
    • Jamal LoweFxG 0.94 · xT 0.09
    • Kieran Yusuf MorrisonFxG 0.18 · xT 0.12
    • Callum SlatteryRWxG 0.05 · xT 0.08
    Cambridge UnitedCambridge United
    Form LWDWD
    League ranking xG #17xGA #17xT #20xP/match #15Points #5
    Key players
    • Sulaiman Borbor KaikaiLWxG 0.13 · xT 0.16
    • Benjamin Leo KnightRWxG 0.25 · xT 0.07
    • Mamadou Ousmane JobeCBxG 0.18 · xT 0.22

    Match prediction: Sheffield Wednesday – Cambridge United

    Predicted score matrix

    Cambridge United →
    Sheffield Wednesday →
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–07.4%
    0–17.7%
    0–24.6%
    0–31.7%
    0–4+0.6%
    1
    1–010.3%
    1–112.5%
    1–26.9%
    1–32.6%
    1–4+1.0%
    2
    2–08.0%
    2–19.2%
    2–25.2%
    2–32.0%
    2–4+0.7%
    3
    3–04.1%
    3–14.6%
    3–22.6%
    3–31.0%
    3–4+0.4%
    4+
    4+–02.2%
    4+–12.5%
    4+–21.4%
    4+–30.5%
    4+–4+0.2%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-112%
    2. 2.1-010%
    3. 3.2-19%
    4. 4.2-08%
    5. 5.0-18%
    Expected goals
    1,51–1,14
    Both teams to score
    53%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,7
    Under 2,550%
    –
    Over 2,550%
    –

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own →

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Sheffield Wednesday or draw (1X)72%
    • Under 3.5 goals72%

    Combined probability

    51%

    Fair odds

    1.94

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Sheffield Wednesday or draw (1X)72%
    • Under 2.5 goals50%
    • Jamal Akua Lowe to score28%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score53%
    • Over 2.5 goals50%
    • Jamal Akua Lowe to score28%
    • Dominic Martin Ball to be booked19%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    No odds available yet.

    Statistics

    Key facts

    • Sheffield Wednesday are unbeaten in their last 5 league matches.
    • Cambridge United have scored in 11 consecutive league matches.
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Sheffield Wednesday
    Cambridge United
    When goals are scored and conceded — 2026
    Sheffield Wednesday (13–6)
    Cambridge United (12–10)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Sheffield Wednesday
    Liam David Ian Cooper: 259 passningar, xT 0.54CooperBilly James Mitchell: 248 passningar, xT 0.14MitchellReece James: 198 passningar, xT 0.78JamesYan Valery: 169 passningar, xT 1.28ValeryBarry Bannan: 153 passningar, xT 0.28BannanJoseph Patrick Lumley: 149 passningar, xT 0.18LumleyRicardo Santos: 144 passningar, xT 0.15SantosCallum Slattery: 139 passningar, xT 0.25SlatteryGabriel Otegbayo: 103 passningar, xT 0.07OtegbayoKieran Yusuf Morrison: 77 passningar, xT 0.43MorrisonJamal Lowe: 55 passningar, xT 0.09Lowe
    Cambridge United
    Callum Perry: 132 passningar, xT 0.33PerryDominic Martin Ball: 129 passningar, xT 0.08BallKelland John William James Watts: 112 passningar, xT 0.33WattsCathal Séan Heffernan Andrews: 96 passningar, xT 0.37AndrewsLiam Dennis Bennett: 85 passningar, xT 0.18BennettOwen Moxon: 78 passningar, xT 0.29MoxonBenjamin Leo Knight: 75 passningar, xT -0.14KnightZak Dominic Bradshaw: 73 passningar, xT 0.91BradshawJake Eastwood: 69 passningar, xT 0.32EastwoodSulaiman Borbor Kaikai: 67 passningar, xT 0.4KaikaiPelly Ruddock Mpanzu: 58 passningar, xT 0.21Mpanzu
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Sheffield Wednesday
    Liam David Ian Cooper: 259 passningar, xT 0.54CooperBilly James Mitchell: 248 passningar, xT 0.14MitchellReece James: 198 passningar, xT 0.78JamesYan Valery: 169 passningar, xT 1.28ValeryBarry Bannan: 153 passningar, xT 0.28BannanJoseph Patrick Lumley: 149 passningar, xT 0.18LumleyRicardo Santos: 144 passningar, xT 0.15SantosCallum Slattery: 139 passningar, xT 0.25SlatteryGabriel Otegbayo: 103 passningar, xT 0.07OtegbayoKieran Yusuf Morrison: 77 passningar, xT 0.43MorrisonJamal Lowe: 55 passningar, xT 0.09Lowe
    Cambridge United
    Callum Perry: 132 passningar, xT 0.33PerryDominic Martin Ball: 129 passningar, xT 0.08BallKelland John William James Watts: 112 passningar, xT 0.33WattsCathal Séan Heffernan Andrews: 96 passningar, xT 0.37AndrewsLiam Dennis Bennett: 85 passningar, xT 0.18BennettOwen Moxon: 78 passningar, xT 0.29MoxonBenjamin Leo Knight: 75 passningar, xT -0.14KnightZak Dominic Bradshaw: 73 passningar, xT 0.91BradshawJake Eastwood: 69 passningar, xT 0.32EastwoodSulaiman Borbor Kaikai: 67 passningar, xT 0.4KaikaiPelly Ruddock Mpanzu: 58 passningar, xT 0.21Mpanzu

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceSheffield WednesdayCambridge United
    Points1412
    xPoints11.39.5
    xG per match21.1
    xGA per match1.21.5
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.610.23
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.180.35
    Playing styleSheffield WednesdayCambridge United
    Build-up efficiency0.280.36
    Field tilt0.520.45
    xT per match1.10.74
    xTA per match0.891.1
    Won balls, offensive half2128
    Pressing intensity0.230.25
    Pressing efficiency0.370.34
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.320.3
    Entries into the box per match1112
    Entries into the box against1313
    Pass completion %0.740.61
    Pass completion % under pressure0.70.63
    Passes per match345233
    Passes against per match278342
    Switches of play per match21.616.1
    Long balls per match2828
    Set piecesSheffield WednesdayCambridge United
    xG from free kicks0.020.08
    Corners per match6.66
    Corners against per match5.54.6
    xG per corner0.030.01
    xGA per corner against0.030.03
    First touch, offensive corners %0.340.36
    First touch, defensive corners %0.440.72
    OtherSheffield WednesdayCambridge United
    Throw-in control0.740.66
    The goalkeepersJoseph Patrick Lumley (Sheffield Wednesday)Jake Eastwood (Cambridge United)
    Saves1719
    Save %77%66%
    xG prevented45%44%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Sheffield Wednesday vs Cambridge United according to our model?

    The model gives Sheffield Wednesday a 43% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Sheffield Wednesday 43%, draw 25%, Cambridge United 32%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 50% and under at 50%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 53% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.