01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Sheffield Wednesday or draw (1X)72%
- Under 3.5 goals72%
EFL League OneHillsborough, Sheffield14°5,8 mm19 km/h
Läs på svenska18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Sofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work
Sheffield Wednesday's unbeaten streak of five matches stands out as a testament to their recent form. Their style of possession control aligns well with their xG of 2.0 per match, suggesting an ability to create significant scoring opportunities. The visitors, on the other hand, have managed to find the net in 11 consecutive league matches, a streak that complements their direct approach. However, their xG of only 1.1 per match and a higher xGA of 1.5 reveal vulnerabilities, particularly against a team that can dominate possession and create chances.
The model gives a slight edge to Wednesday, with a 43% win probability compared to Cambridge's 32%. This tilt is further supported by the expected goals: 1.51 for the hosts and 1.14 for the visitors. While the historical head-to-head data is too limited to influence this analysis significantly, Wednesday's superior xPoints and xGA figures suggest they have the upper hand. The most likely scorelines, a tight 1-1 or a narrow 1-0 win for the hosts, reflect the model's cautious optimism towards Wednesday.
For those eyeing a betting angle, Sheffield Wednesday to win at odds around 2.3 offers potential value, based on their stronger underlying metrics. The over/under 2.5 goals remains finely poised at 50%, but given the trends, a 1-1 draw or slim home victory seems the prudent call.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
No odds available yet.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Sheffield Wednesday | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 14 | 12 |
| xPoints | 11.3 | 9.5 |
| xG per match | 2 | 1.1 |
| xGA per match | 1.2 | 1.5 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.61 | 0.23 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.18 | 0.35 |
| Playing style | Sheffield Wednesday | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.28 | 0.36 |
| Field tilt | 0.52 | 0.45 |
| xT per match | 1.1 | 0.74 |
| xTA per match | 0.89 | 1.1 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 21 | 28 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.25 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.37 | 0.34 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.32 | 0.3 |
| Entries into the box per match | 11 | 12 |
| Entries into the box against | 13 | 13 |
| Pass completion % | 0.74 | 0.61 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.7 | 0.63 |
| Passes per match | 345 | 233 |
| Passes against per match | 278 | 342 |
| Switches of play per match | 21.6 | 16.1 |
| Long balls per match | 28 | 28 |
| Set pieces | Sheffield Wednesday | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.02 | 0.08 |
| Corners per match | 6.6 | 6 |
| Corners against per match | 5.5 | 4.6 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.01 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.34 | 0.36 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.44 | 0.72 |
| Other | Sheffield Wednesday | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.74 | 0.66 |
| The goalkeepers | Joseph Patrick Lumley (Sheffield Wednesday) | Jake Eastwood (Cambridge United) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 17 | 19 |
| Save % | 77% | 66% |
| xG prevented | 45% | 44% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Sheffield Wednesday a 43% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Sheffield Wednesday 43%, draw 25%, Cambridge United 32%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 50% and under at 50%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 53% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

250 kr gratisspel plus freespins
Hämta bonus
100 kr gratisspel plus freespins
Hämta bonus
100 kr gratisspel plus freespins
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.