Premier LeagueSelhurst Park, London17°0,2 mm14 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Crystal PalaceCrystal PalaceLow block & direct
    vs
    Ipswich TownIpswich TownPossession control
    The model's lean: 1 · Crystal Palace (43%)Best value by the model: Under 0,5 @ 14.00 (+16 %)

    Crystal PalaceIpswich Town · Premier League

    1 · Crystal Palace 43%X 28%29% Ipswich Town · 2

    Analysis: Crystal PalaceIpswich Town

    Sofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work

    Crystal Palace's direct approach will clash with Ipswich Town's possession control at Selhurst Park. While Palace holds a slight advantage according to the model probabilities — 43% in their favor — Ipswich's underlying metrics whisper an upset. Their xPoints of 3.7 and xG of 1.1 per match suggest that the visitors have the tools to trouble the hosts, despite the latter's head-to-head edge over a small two-game sample.

    Palace's vulnerability lies in their defensive metrics, with an alarming xGA of 2.6 per match and a particularly worrying xGA of 0.94 within eight seconds of losing possession. Ipswich excels in this area, conceding just 0.21 xGA when quickly countered. This could become the match's fulcrum, especially as the visitors look to leverage their superior control and Palace's shaky defense.

    The most likely scoreline, a 1-1 draw at 13%, indicates a tight contest, but the odds tell a story of potential value for those backing Ipswich. With odds of 4.05 at Nordicbet, 4.03 at Betsson, and 4.0 at Betsafe, there is a clear edge for bettors with the model rating Ipswich's chances at 29%. Such a disparity between implied and true probabilities highlights a hidden opportunity.

    The numbers also hint at a moderate goal environment, with over 2.5 goals sitting at 47% and both teams to score at 52%. While the game might not explode into a high-scoring affair, the tactical battle and the clash of styles could lead to a moment of brilliance—or error—that shifts the scales.

    In pure value terms, Ipswich Town at those odds stands out as the sharper play. While nothing is guaranteed, the metrics suggest that backing the underdog could be a calculated risk worth taking.

    Crystal PalaceCrystal Palace
    Form DLLLW
    League ranking xG #17xGA #20xT #6xP/match #20Points #14
    Key players
    • Adam WhartonFxG 0.00 · xT 0.14
    • Tyrick MitchellLWBxG 0.13 · xT 0.20
    • Daichi KamadaCMxG 0.01 · xT 0.08
    Ipswich TownIpswich Town
    Form LLWLL
    League ranking xG #14xGA #16xT #10xP/match #14Points #13
    Key players
    • EmersonnFxG 0.35 · xT 0.07
    • Leif DavisLWBxG 0.16 · xT 0.09
    • Julio EncisoCAMxG 0.29 · xT 0.15

    Match prediction: Crystal PalaceIpswich Town

    Predicted score matrix

    Ipswich Town
    Crystal Palace
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–08.3%
    0–19.3%
    0–25.9%
    0–32.4%
    0–4+1.0%
    1
    1–010.0%
    1–113.1%
    1–27.8%
    1–33.2%
    1–4+1.3%
    2
    2–06.8%
    2–18.4%
    2–25.1%
    2–32.1%
    2–4+0.8%
    3
    3–03.0%
    3–13.7%
    3–22.2%
    3–30.9%
    3–4+0.4%
    4+
    4+–01.3%
    4+–11.6%
    4+–21.0%
    4+–30.4%
    4+–4+0.2%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-113%
    2. 2.1-010%
    3. 3.0-19%
    4. 4.2-18%
    5. 5.0-08%
    Expected goals
    1,311,22
    Both teams to score
    52%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,5
    Under 2,553%
    @2.06EV+10%
    Over 2,547%
    @1.81

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Crystal Palace or draw (1X)66%
    • Under 3.5 goals75%

    Combined probability

    50%

    Fair odds

    2.02

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Crystal Palace or draw (1X)66%
    • Under 2.5 goals53%
    • Christantus Ugonna Uche to score21%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score52%
    • Over 2.5 goals47%
    • Iván Azón Monzón to score25%
    • Adam James Wharton to be booked23%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • Under 0.58% probability@14.00BetsafeEV+16%reference odds
    • Under 0.58% probability@14.00BetssonEV+16%reference odds
    • Under 0.58% probability@14.00NordicbetEV+16%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · Crystal PalaceX2 · Ipswich Town
    Betsafe1.88
    EV+ 6%
    3.75
    EV+ 13%
    3.90
    Betsson1.88
    EV+ 6%
    3.75
    EV+ 13%
    3.92
    Nordicbet1.88
    EV+ 6%
    3.75
    EV+ 13%
    3.90
    Pinnacle1.91
    EV+ 10%
    3.88
    EV+ 11%
    3.86

    Odds updated 7 Sept, 17:36

    Odds movement

    10 %
    53 %48 %

    1.921.91

    X+3 %
    28 %23 %

    3.753.88

    2+3 %
    27 %22 %

    3.733.86

    Over 2,5-4 %
    54 %49 %

    1.881.81

    Pinnacle · 4 recorded price levels · 04/09/2026 → 07/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    2 matches
    Crystal Palace 2Draw 0Ipswich Town 0
    Goals: 20 (⌀ 1)

    Head-to-head based on Premier League data since 2022.

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Crystal Palace
    Ipswich Town
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Crystal Palace (48)
    Ipswich Town (48)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Crystal Palace
    Jaydee Canvot: 152 passningar, xT 0.13CanvotDaichi Kamada: 118 passningar, xT 0.16KamadaChris Richards: 115 passningar, xT 0.09RichardsAdam Wharton: 93 passningar, xT 0.38WhartonDean Henderson: 76 passningar, xT -0.03HendersonAnan Khalaili: 74 passningar, xT 0.19KhalailiTyrick Mitchell: 70 passningar, xT 0.39MitchellYeremy Pino: 66 passningar, xT 0.42PinoAxel Disasi: 53 passningar, xT -0.06DisasiChadi Riad: 42 passningar, xT 0.08RiadTakehiro Tomiyasu: 38 passningar, xT 0.05Tomiyasu
    Ipswich Town
    Saša Lukić: 122 passningar, xT 0.04LukićJacob Greaves: 114 passningar, xT 0.09GreavesIssa Diop: 114 passningar, xT -0.04DiopDara O'Shea: 87 passningar, xT 0.31O'SheaLeif Davis: 77 passningar, xT 0.28DavisKjell Scherpen: 74 passningar, xT 0.09ScherpenJulio Enciso: 70 passningar, xT 0.24EncisoExequiel Palacios: 63 passningar, xT 0.04PalaciosMarcelino Nunez: 60 passningar, xT 0.01NunezAbdoul Ouattara: 37 passningar, xT 0.01OuattaraAbdul Fatawu: 31 passningar, xT 1.06Fatawu
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Crystal Palace
    Jaydee Canvot: 152 passningar, xT 0.13CanvotDaichi Kamada: 118 passningar, xT 0.16KamadaChris Richards: 115 passningar, xT 0.09RichardsAdam Wharton: 93 passningar, xT 0.38WhartonDean Henderson: 76 passningar, xT -0.03HendersonAnan Khalaili: 74 passningar, xT 0.19KhalailiTyrick Mitchell: 70 passningar, xT 0.39MitchellYeremy Pino: 66 passningar, xT 0.42PinoAxel Disasi: 53 passningar, xT -0.06DisasiChadi Riad: 42 passningar, xT 0.08RiadTakehiro Tomiyasu: 38 passningar, xT 0.05Tomiyasu
    Ipswich Town
    Saša Lukić: 122 passningar, xT 0.04LukićJacob Greaves: 114 passningar, xT 0.09GreavesIssa Diop: 114 passningar, xT -0.04DiopDara O'Shea: 87 passningar, xT 0.31O'SheaLeif Davis: 77 passningar, xT 0.28DavisKjell Scherpen: 74 passningar, xT 0.09ScherpenJulio Enciso: 70 passningar, xT 0.24EncisoExequiel Palacios: 63 passningar, xT 0.04PalaciosMarcelino Nunez: 60 passningar, xT 0.01NunezAbdoul Ouattara: 37 passningar, xT 0.01OuattaraAbdul Fatawu: 31 passningar, xT 1.06Fatawu

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceCrystal PalaceIpswich Town
    Points33
    xPoints2.13.7
    xG per match0.91.1
    xGA per match2.61.8
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.240.24
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.940.21
    Playing styleCrystal PalaceIpswich Town
    Build-up efficiency0.310.29
    Field tilt0.30.32
    xT per match1.10.87
    xTA per match1.40.8
    Won balls, offensive half2120
    Pressing intensity0.260.22
    Pressing efficiency0.230.21
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.190.19
    Entries into the box per match77
    Entries into the box against2016
    Pass completion %0.780.76
    Pass completion % under pressure0.70.73
    Passes per match342313
    Passes against per match540479
    Switches of play per match14.917.1
    Long balls per match2123
    Set piecesCrystal PalaceIpswich Town
    xG from free kicks0.010
    Corners per match0.993.7
    Corners against per match5.65.4
    xG per corner00.02
    xGA per corner against0.030.01
    First touch, offensive corners %00.18
    First touch, defensive corners %0.590.44
    OtherCrystal PalaceIpswich Town
    Throw-in control0.690.68
    The goalkeepersDean Henderson (Crystal Palace)Kjell Scherpen (Ipswich Town)
    Saves1214
    Save %60%67%
    xG prevented47%49%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Crystal Palace vs Ipswich Town according to our model?

    The model gives Crystal Palace a 43% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Crystal Palace 43%, draw 28%, Ipswich Town 29%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 47% and under at 53%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 52% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.