01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Crystal Palace or draw (1X)66%
- Under 3.5 goals75%
Premier LeagueSelhurst Park, London17°0,2 mm14 km/h
Läs på svenskaSofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work
Crystal Palace's direct approach will clash with Ipswich Town's possession control at Selhurst Park. While Palace holds a slight advantage according to the model probabilities — 43% in their favor — Ipswich's underlying metrics whisper an upset. Their xPoints of 3.7 and xG of 1.1 per match suggest that the visitors have the tools to trouble the hosts, despite the latter's head-to-head edge over a small two-game sample.
Palace's vulnerability lies in their defensive metrics, with an alarming xGA of 2.6 per match and a particularly worrying xGA of 0.94 within eight seconds of losing possession. Ipswich excels in this area, conceding just 0.21 xGA when quickly countered. This could become the match's fulcrum, especially as the visitors look to leverage their superior control and Palace's shaky defense.
The most likely scoreline, a 1-1 draw at 13%, indicates a tight contest, but the odds tell a story of potential value for those backing Ipswich. With odds of 4.05 at Nordicbet, 4.03 at Betsson, and 4.0 at Betsafe, there is a clear edge for bettors with the model rating Ipswich's chances at 29%. Such a disparity between implied and true probabilities highlights a hidden opportunity.
The numbers also hint at a moderate goal environment, with over 2.5 goals sitting at 47% and both teams to score at 52%. While the game might not explode into a high-scoring affair, the tactical battle and the clash of styles could lead to a moment of brilliance—or error—that shifts the scales.
In pure value terms, Ipswich Town at those odds stands out as the sharper play. While nothing is guaranteed, the metrics suggest that backing the underdog could be a calculated risk worth taking.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Crystal Palace | X | 2 · Ipswich Town |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 1.88 | EV+ 6% 3.75 | EV+ 13% 3.90 |
| Betsson | 1.88 | EV+ 6% 3.75 | EV+ 13% 3.92 |
| Nordicbet | 1.88 | EV+ 6% 3.75 | EV+ 13% 3.90 |
| Pinnacle | 1.91 | EV+ 10% 3.88 | EV+ 11% 3.86 |
Odds updated 7 Sept, 17:36
1.92 → 1.91
3.75 → 3.88
3.73 → 3.86
1.88 → 1.81
Pinnacle · 4 recorded price levels · 04/09/2026 → 07/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Premier League data since 2022.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Crystal Palace | Ipswich Town |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 3 | 3 |
| xPoints | 2.1 | 3.7 |
| xG per match | 0.9 | 1.1 |
| xGA per match | 2.6 | 1.8 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.24 | 0.24 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.94 | 0.21 |
| Playing style | Crystal Palace | Ipswich Town |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.31 | 0.29 |
| Field tilt | 0.3 | 0.32 |
| xT per match | 1.1 | 0.87 |
| xTA per match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 21 | 20 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.26 | 0.22 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.23 | 0.21 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.19 | 0.19 |
| Entries into the box per match | 7 | 7 |
| Entries into the box against | 20 | 16 |
| Pass completion % | 0.78 | 0.76 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.7 | 0.73 |
| Passes per match | 342 | 313 |
| Passes against per match | 540 | 479 |
| Switches of play per match | 14.9 | 17.1 |
| Long balls per match | 21 | 23 |
| Set pieces | Crystal Palace | Ipswich Town |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.01 | 0 |
| Corners per match | 0.99 | 3.7 |
| Corners against per match | 5.6 | 5.4 |
| xG per corner | 0 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.01 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0 | 0.18 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.59 | 0.44 |
| Other | Crystal Palace | Ipswich Town |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.69 | 0.68 |
| The goalkeepers | Dean Henderson (Crystal Palace) | Kjell Scherpen (Ipswich Town) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 12 | 14 |
| Save % | 60% | 67% |
| xG prevented | 47% | 49% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Crystal Palace a 43% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Crystal Palace 43%, draw 28%, Ipswich Town 29%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 47% and under at 53%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 52% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.