Premier LeagueCraven Cottage, London20°1,8 mm12 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    FulhamFulhamPossession control
    vs
    Crystal PalaceCrystal PalaceBalanced & physical
    The model's lean: 1 · Fulham (43%)Best value by the model: Under 1,5 @ 3.75 (+13 %)

    FulhamCrystal Palace · Premier League

    1 · Fulham 43%X 29%28% Crystal Palace · 2

    Analysis: FulhamCrystal Palace

    Sofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work

    Fulham's ability to control possession is a vital asset in this clash against Crystal Palace. The hosts hold a slight statistical edge in expected goals (xG) per match at 1.5 compared to Palace's 1.3, suggesting that their ability to generate scoring opportunities might tilt the balance in their favor. However, Fulham's defensive vulnerabilities are evident, with an xGA (expected goals against) of 1.8 per match, which is notably higher than Palace's 1.5. This discrepancy points to potential openings for the visitors to exploit.

    The model probabilities provide a 43% chance of Fulham securing a win, underscoring a lean towards the home side. But Crystal Palace, with a 28% chance of victory, cannot be discounted, especially given their physical playing style that could disrupt Fulham's possession-based approach. The head-to-head record is limited to four matches since 2022, where Palace has the upper hand with two wins, indicating a competitive edge in recent encounters.

    Despite the forecast of rain, which generally suppresses scoring, the expected goals figures for both teams suggest a closely contested affair. The most likely scorelines lean towards draws, with 1-1 at 13% and a 1-0 win for Fulham at 12%. These probabilities mirror the calculated expected goals of 1.35 for Fulham and 1.06 for Palace, fitting the pattern of a low-scoring match. The under 2.5 goals scenario, at 57%, appears as a prudent assessment given the weather and defensive stats.

    For bettors seeking value, the 1-0 victory for Fulham at odds with a bookmaker could present an opportunity, provided the odds reflect the model's 12% probability. The model's lean towards Fulham, along with their capacity to create opportunities quickly after gaining possession (0.47 xG within 8 seconds), hints at their potential to edge out a narrow win despite Palace's resilience.

    FulhamFulham
    Form LLDWL
    League ranking xG #9xGA #16xT #12xP/match #15Points #12
    Key players
    • Alex IwobiCAMxG 0.06 · xT 0.19
    • Raul JimenezFxG 0.49 · xT 0.00
    • Joachim AndersenCBxG 0.07 · xT 0.10
    Crystal PalaceCrystal Palace
    Form DLDLL
    League ranking xG #10xGA #13xT #5xP/match #14Points #17
    Key players
    • Adam WhartonCMxG 0.00 · xT 0.23
    • Daichi KamadaCMxG 0.00 · xT 0.16
    • Tyrick MitchellLWBxG 0.00 · xT 0.02

    Match prediction: FulhamCrystal Palace

    Predicted score matrix

    Crystal Palace
    Fulham
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–09.4%
    0–19.1%
    0–25.0%
    0–31.8%
    0–4+0.6%
    1
    1–011.8%
    1–113.2%
    1–26.8%
    1–32.4%
    1–4+0.8%
    2
    2–08.2%
    2–18.7%
    2–24.6%
    2–31.6%
    2–4+0.5%
    3
    3–03.7%
    3–13.9%
    3–22.1%
    3–30.7%
    3–4+0.2%
    4+
    4+–01.7%
    4+–11.8%
    4+–20.9%
    4+–30.3%
    4+–4+0.1%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-113%
    2. 2.1-012%
    3. 3.0-09%
    4. 4.0-19%
    5. 5.2-19%
    Expected goals
    1,351,06
    Both teams to score
    49%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,4
    Under 2,557%
    @1.98EV+12%
    Over 2,543%
    @1.89

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Fulham or draw (1X)71%
    • Under 3.5 goals78%

    Combined probability

    55%

    Fair odds

    1.82

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Fulham or draw (1X)71%
    • Under 2.5 goals57%
    • Raúl Alonso Jiménez Rodríguez to score22%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score49%
    • Over 2.5 goals43%
    • Raúl Alonso Jiménez Rodríguez to score22%
    • Adam James Wharton to be booked22%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • Under 1.530% probability@3.75BetsafeEV+13%reference odds
    • Under 1.530% probability@3.75BetssonEV+13%reference odds
    • Under 1.530% probability@3.75NordicbetEV+13%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · FulhamX2 · Crystal Palace
    Betsafe2.283.353.10
    Betsson2.283.383.14
    Nordicbet2.283.403.15
    Pinnacle2.29
    EV+ 1%
    3.51
    3.17

    Odds updated 31 Aug, 11:36

    Odds movement

    1-4 %
    44 %39 %

    2.382.29

    X+5 %
    30 %25 %

    3.353.51

    2+6 %
    33 %28 %

    3.003.17

    Over 2,5-2 %
    53 %48 %

    1.931.89

    Pinnacle · 4 recorded price levels · 28/08/2026 → 31/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    4 matches
    Fulham 1Draw 1Crystal Palace 2
    Goals: 45 (⌀ 2,2)

    Head-to-head based on Premier League data since 2022.

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Fulham
    Crystal Palace
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Fulham (23)
    Crystal Palace (02)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Fulham
    Alex Iwobi: 78 passningar, xT 0.05IwobiCalvin Bassey: 74 passningar, xT 0.13BasseyJorge Cuenca: 71 passningar, xT 0.22CuencaSander Berge: 56 passningar, xT -0.03BergeTimothy Castagne: 40 passningar, xT 0.11CastagneBernd Leno: 38 passningar, xT 0.02LenoAntonee Robinson: 38 passningar, xT 0.01RobinsonCésar Palacios: 32 passningar, xT -0.05PalaciosJosh King: 27 passningar, xT -0.03KingShea Charles: 24 passningar, xT 0.01CharlesGonzalo García: 21 passningar, xT -0.03García
    Crystal Palace
    Jaydee Canvot: 73 passningar, xT 0.08CanvotDaichi Kamada: 66 passningar, xT 0.15KamadaChris Richards: 59 passningar, xT 0.01RichardsAdam Wharton: 57 passningar, xT 0.18WhartonChadi Riad: 42 passningar, xT 0.08RiadTyrick Mitchell: 31 passningar, xT 0.01MitchellDaniel Munoz: 29 passningar, xT 0.05MunozDean Henderson: 28 passningar, xT -0.01HendersonDwight Mcneil: 26 passningar, xT 0McneilAnan Khalaili: 23 passningar, xT 0.11KhalailiTakehiro Tomiyasu: 19 passningar, xT 0.03Tomiyasu
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Fulham
    Alex Iwobi: 78 passningar, xT 0.05IwobiCalvin Bassey: 74 passningar, xT 0.13BasseyJorge Cuenca: 71 passningar, xT 0.22CuencaSander Berge: 56 passningar, xT -0.03BergeTimothy Castagne: 40 passningar, xT 0.11CastagneBernd Leno: 38 passningar, xT 0.02LenoAntonee Robinson: 38 passningar, xT 0.01RobinsonCésar Palacios: 32 passningar, xT -0.05PalaciosJosh King: 27 passningar, xT -0.03KingShea Charles: 24 passningar, xT 0.01CharlesGonzalo García: 21 passningar, xT -0.03García
    Crystal Palace
    Jaydee Canvot: 73 passningar, xT 0.08CanvotDaichi Kamada: 66 passningar, xT 0.15KamadaChris Richards: 59 passningar, xT 0.01RichardsAdam Wharton: 57 passningar, xT 0.18WhartonChadi Riad: 42 passningar, xT 0.08RiadTyrick Mitchell: 31 passningar, xT 0.01MitchellDaniel Munoz: 29 passningar, xT 0.05MunozDean Henderson: 28 passningar, xT -0.01HendersonDwight Mcneil: 26 passningar, xT 0McneilAnan Khalaili: 23 passningar, xT 0.11KhalailiTakehiro Tomiyasu: 19 passningar, xT 0.03Tomiyasu

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceFulhamCrystal Palace
    Points00
    xPoints0.91
    xG per match1.51.3
    xGA per match1.81.5
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.470.44
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.530.7
    Playing styleFulhamCrystal Palace
    Build-up efficiency0.330.31
    Field tilt0.630.5
    xT per match0.791.3
    xTA per match0.911
    Won balls, offensive half2330
    Pressing intensity0.210.27
    Pressing efficiency0.240.27
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.220.24
    Entries into the box per match117
    Entries into the box against1217
    Pass completion %0.810.82
    Pass completion % under pressure0.770.75
    Passes per match541482
    Passes against per match320329
    Switches of play per match39.413.6
    Long balls per match4414
    Set piecesFulhamCrystal Palace
    xG from free kicks00
    Corners per match6.10
    Corners against per match43.9
    xG per corner0.010
    xGA per corner against0.080.01
    First touch, offensive corners %0.50
    First touch, defensive corners %0.50.75
    OtherFulhamCrystal Palace
    Throw-in control0.860.68
    The goalkeepersBernd Leno (Fulham)Dean Henderson (Crystal Palace)
    Saves33
    Save %50%60%
    xG prevented41%49%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Fulham vs Crystal Palace according to our model?

    The model gives Fulham a 43% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Fulham 43%, draw 29%, Crystal Palace 28%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 43% and under at 57%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 49% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.