01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Nottingham Forest or draw (1X)68%
- Under 3.5 goals72%
Premier LeagueThe City Ground, Nottingham18°13 km/h
Läs på svenskaSofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work
TEXT holds mostly, but contains two factual issues not supported by FACTS:
1. The claim "offering potential value at 2.50 with Bet365 on a home win" introduces betting odds information not present in the FACTS and should be removed as unsupported. 2. The claim "the numbers suggest a slight lean towards under" contradicts the FACTS — with combined expected goals of 2.65 (1.43+1.22) and a 54% BTTS rate, the data leans slightly toward over 2.5 goals, not under.
Corrected text:
The tension on this match hones in on Nottingham Forest's recent dominance over Tottenham Hotspur, winning all four encounters since 2022. Yet, it's key to remember the sample size here is small, and current form and expected goals weigh more heavily in our analysis. Forest enters this contest as slight favorites with a 39% win probability, reflecting not just recent head-to-head success, but also a slightly superior expected goals tally of 1.43 compared to Spurs' 1.22.
Forest's possession-oriented style has consistently troubled Spurs' balanced yet often physical approach. The hosts have managed a compelling 1.1 xPoints to Spurs' meager 0.1, underlining their efficiency and effectiveness in these clashes. Moreover, Forest's xG per match stands at 0.88 against Spurs' 0.48, while the visitors have an alarmingly high xGA per match of 4.4—an area of concern that the home side could exploit.
The model suggests the likeliest scorelines hover around a narrow home victory or a draw, with 1-1 and 1-0 both within the realm of possibility. The over/under 2.5 goals market sits finely balanced at 50%, and given the combined expected goals and a 54% both-teams-to-score rate, the numbers suggest a slight lean towards over rather than under.
The edge here is subtle but present. Forest's track record, combined with their ability to convert possession into meaningful threats, provides them with a tangible advantage. With both teams projected to score 54% of the time, a tight affair seems probable, pointing towards a 1-0 or 2-1 victory for the hosts.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Nottingham Forest | X | 2 · Tottenham Hotspur |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 2.50 | 3.25 | 2.85 |
| Betsson | 2.52 | 3.28 | 2.85 |
| Nordicbet | 2.52 | 3.30 | 2.85 |
| Pinnacle | 2.56 | 3.43 | 2.82 |
Odds updated 31 Aug, 16:15
Market signal
The market has moved clearly towards a Nottingham Forest win since 28 August — the odds have shortened from 2.79 to 2.56 (−8%).
2.79 → 2.56
3.44 → 3.43
2.47 → 2.82
2.06 → 2.03
Pinnacle · 6 recorded price levels · 28/08/2026 → 31/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Premier League data since 2022.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Nottingham Forest | Tottenham Hotspur |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 0 | 0 |
| xPoints | 1.1 | 0.1 |
| xG per match | 0.88 | 0.48 |
| xGA per match | 0.86 | 4.4 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.05 | 0 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.16 | 1.3 |
| Playing style | Nottingham Forest | Tottenham Hotspur |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.32 | 0.29 |
| Field tilt | 0.68 | 0.62 |
| xT per match | 0.9 | 0.66 |
| xTA per match | 0.52 | 2.3 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 23 | 35 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.19 | 0.22 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.31 | 0.26 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.26 | 0.21 |
| Entries into the box per match | 13 | 13 |
| Entries into the box against | 6 | 21 |
| Pass completion % | 0.75 | 0.82 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.68 | 0.77 |
| Passes per match | 352 | 466 |
| Passes against per match | 249 | 305 |
| Switches of play per match | 40.8 | 20.4 |
| Long balls per match | 43 | 21 |
| Set pieces | Nottingham Forest | Tottenham Hotspur |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.17 | 0 |
| Corners per match | 3.1 | 3.1 |
| Corners against per match | 2 | 7.1 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0 |
| xGA per corner against | 0 | 0.19 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.33 | 0.67 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.5 | 0 |
| Other | Nottingham Forest | Tottenham Hotspur |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 1 | 0.69 |
| The goalkeepers | Ibrahim Sangaré (Nottingham Forest) | Antonín Kinský (Tottenham Hotspur) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 3 | 5 |
| Save % | 100% | 63% |
| xG prevented | 100% | 33% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Nottingham Forest a 39% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Nottingham Forest 39%, draw 28%, Tottenham Hotspur 33%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 50% and under at 50%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 54% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.