01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Volos or draw (X2)63%
- Over 1.5 goals78%
Greek Super League26°21 km/h
Läs på svenska
KalamataCounter-attacks & crosses
VolosPossession control18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Marcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work
TEXT: Kalamata's reliance on counterattacks and crosses suggests a strategy built around capitalizing on defensive lapses, rather than dictating play. However, their current xG stands at a mere 0.82 per match, highlighting their struggle to convert these chances into goals. With only 1 point from matches so far and an expected goals against of 1.9, the hosts find themselves on the back foot.
Volos, on the other hand, seems to have the upper hand. Their possession-based approach is supported by a slightly better xG of 0.94 and a more robust defense, conceding only 1.2 xGA per match. Volos's 2 points reflect their marginally superior performance, but it's their control over the game that serves as a potential game-changer. The narrow expected goals margin—Volos at 1.42 against Kalamata's 1.40—paints a picture of a tightly contested battle, yet the model still gives Volos a 44% chance of coming out on top.
Kalamata's ability to disrupt Volos's rhythm will be crucial. The most likely outcomes—1-1 (12%) and 1-2 (8%)—indicate the possibility of a closely fought match. However, with a 53% chance of over 2.5 goals and a 57% probability of both teams scoring, the numbers suggest a game with its share of action.
For bettors, the sharpest angle lies in the goal market. Betsson offers odds of 9.2 for over 4.5 goals, where the model sees a 43% value edge. Similarly, there's a compelling 40% value edge for over 3.5 goals at 4.5 odds with Betsson, and a 39% edge at 4.45 odds with Betsafe. While these are high-risk plays, the figures highlight a potential underestimation of the match's goal-scoring potential.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Kalamata | X | 2 · Volos |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 2.48 | 3.00 | EV+ 25% 2.85 |
| Betsson | 2.48 | 3.05 | EV+ 27% 2.88 |
| Nordicbet | 2.48 | 3.00 | EV+ 25% 2.85 |
| Paddy Power | 2.38 | 3.00 | EV+ 23% 2.80 |
| Pinnacle | 2.52 | 3.19 | EV+ 33% 3.01 |
Odds updated 13 Sept, 07:05
2.54 → 2.52
3.09 → 3.19
2.93 → 3.01
Pinnacle · 12 recorded price levels · 07/09/2026 → 13/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Kalamata | Volos |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 1 | 2 |
| xPoints | 2.8 | 3.2 |
| xG per match | 0.82 | 0.94 |
| xGA per match | 1.9 | 1.2 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.05 | 0.24 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.48 | 0.3 |
| Playing style | Kalamata | Volos |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.28 | 0.3 |
| Field tilt | 0.38 | 0.57 |
| xT per match | 0.88 | 0.88 |
| xTA per match | 1.1 | 0.38 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 25 | 25 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.26 | 0.21 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.34 | 0.29 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.33 | 0.2 |
| Entries into the box per match | 9 | 9 |
| Entries into the box against | 16 | 8 |
| Pass completion % | 0.72 | 0.74 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.69 | 0.65 |
| Passes per match | 244 | 278 |
| Passes against per match | 293 | 322 |
| Switches of play per match | 19.2 | 25.9 |
| Long balls per match | 27 | 29 |
| Set pieces | Kalamata | Volos |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.19 | 0.17 |
| Corners per match | 2 | 1.3 |
| Corners against per match | 7.2 | 5.2 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.5 | 0.75 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.59 | 0.62 |
| Other | Kalamata | Volos |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.69 | 0.71 |
| The goalkeepers | Stefanos Stroungis (Kalamata) | Marios Siampanis (Volos) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 8 | 3 |
| Save % | 100% | 50% |
| xG prevented | 100% | 11% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Volos a 44% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Kalamata 32%, draw 24%, Volos 44%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 53% and under at 47%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 57% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Hämta bonus
Se ComeOns villkor
Hämta bonus
Se Hajpers villkor
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.