01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance KS Cracovia or draw (X2)70%
- Over 1.5 goals79%
Ekstraklasa14°9 km/h
Läs på svenska
Wisła PłockCounter-attacks & crossesMarcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work
TEXT: Three consecutive losses hang over Wisła Płock like a cloud as they face KS Cracovia, who hold a 42% model-backed chance of victory. The visitors' tactical mirror — counter attacks and crosses — offers little contrast, but the numbers tip in their favor. Cracovia’s sharper edge in expected goals (1.64 to 1.28) and expected points (9.3 to 6.0) suggests they're more efficient in exploiting similar opportunities.
Wisła Płock may draw some confidence from a small head-to-head sample, having not lost against Cracovia since 2023. Yet, that's a narrow plank of form to stand on. Their defensive frailty, conceding 1.8 xGA per match compared to Cracovia's tighter 1.3, underscores a vulnerability that the visitors are well-equipped to exploit. The most likely scorelines, 1-1 (12%) and 1-2 (9%), reflect a tight contest with a slight tilt toward Cracovia.
The model's 56% probability for over 2.5 goals indicates a higher scoring potential, while both teams to score is pegged at 58%. With Cracovia's tactical alignment and recent form, an away win is the sharpest angle to consider.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Wisła Płock | X | 2 · KS Cracovia |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 2.55 | 3.10 | EV+ 10% 2.62 |
| Betsson | 2.55 | 3.10 | EV+ 10% 2.62 |
| Nordicbet | 2.55 | 3.10 | EV+ 10% 2.62 |
| Paddy Power | 2.50 | 3.10 | EV+ 5% 2.50 |
Odds updated 6 Sept, 16:13
Head-to-head based on Ekstraklasa data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Wisła Płock | KS Cracovia |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 4 | 8 |
| xPoints | 6 | 9.3 |
| xG per match | 1.5 | 1.8 |
| xGA per match | 1.8 | 1.3 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.13 | 0.25 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.35 | 0.21 |
| Playing style | Wisła Płock | KS Cracovia |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.33 | 0.31 |
| Field tilt | 0.44 | 0.49 |
| xT per match | 0.98 | 1.3 |
| xTA per match | 1.1 | 0.9 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 26 | 26 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.25 | 0.28 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.26 | 0.25 |
| Entries into the box per match | 16 | 15 |
| Entries into the box against | 11 | 14 |
| Pass completion % | 0.76 | 0.75 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.68 | 0.67 |
| Passes per match | 364 | 312 |
| Passes against per match | 328 | 336 |
| Switches of play per match | 29.4 | 17.9 |
| Long balls per match | 30 | 23 |
| Set pieces | Wisła Płock | KS Cracovia |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| Corners per match | 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Corners against per match | 3.2 | 7 |
| xG per corner | 0.04 | 0.05 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.47 | 0.52 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.62 | 0.64 |
| Other | Wisła Płock | KS Cracovia |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.86 | 0.77 |
| The goalkeepers | Rafal Leszczynski (Wisła Płock) | Sebastian Madejski (KS Cracovia) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 13 | 18 |
| Save % | 56% | 72% |
| xG prevented | 40% | 30% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives KS Cracovia a 42% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Wisła Płock 32%, draw 26%, KS Cracovia 42%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 56% and under at 44%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 58% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.