01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Åtvidaberg or draw (X2)73%
- Over 1.5 goals83%
Swedish Ettan14°1,5 mm21 km/h
Läs på svenskaMarcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work
The numbers tell a compelling story leading into Laholm's meeting with Åtvidaberg. With probabilities favoring the visitors at 42% and Laholm trailing at 31%, the stats clearly lean towards an Åtvidaberg victory. The expected goals further bolster this narrative, with the visitors predicted to outscore the hosts 1.87 to 1.35. While Laholm’s strategy revolves around controlling possession, Åtvidaberg’s high pressing game could disrupt this and tilt the scales in their favor.
Despite only a single head-to-head encounter, which Åtvidaberg won, the sample is too small to overshadow their current form and superior xPoints and xG metrics. Crucially, Åtvidaberg has a tangible advantage in nearly every statistical category, from points to xGA per match. This paints a picture of a team more likely to capitalize on opportunities, especially against a Laholm side that concedes 1.4 xGA per game.
The expected goal total stands at 62% for over 2.5 goals, with both teams likely to score at 63%. However, the anticipated rain of 2.4 mm might dampen the goal-scoring potential slightly, although this effect is already factored into the model’s numbers. The weather should be considered when weighing the likelihood of a lower-scoring affair, despite the statistical lean towards a more open game.
The most probable scorelines, 1-1 at 10% and 1-2 at 9%, suggest a closely contested match. But given Åtvidaberg's tactical edge and overall metrics, a 1-2 result seems just that bit more plausible. The 0-1 possibility at 7% also underscores the visitors' capability of securing a narrow win through solid defensive play.
From a betting perspective, the odds favoring Åtvidaberg could provide value, particularly if bookmakers like Unibet offer odds reflecting their 42% win probability. This match presents a classic scenario where form and tactical acumen may just outweigh the home advantage.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
No odds available yet.
Head-to-head based on Ettan data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Laholm | Åtvidaberg |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 22 | 39 |
| xPoints | 28.8 | 32.4 |
| xG per match | 1.3 | 1.5 |
| xGA per match | 1.4 | 1.1 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.26 | 0.24 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.4 | 0.12 |
| Playing style | Laholm | Åtvidaberg |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.37 | 0.34 |
| Field tilt | 0.44 | 0.61 |
| xT per match | 1.3 | 1.5 |
| xTA per match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 25 | 29 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.47 | 0.55 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.26 | 0.27 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.26 | 0.28 |
| Entries into the box per match | 12 | 15 |
| Entries into the box against | 12 | 10 |
| Pass completion % | 0.78 | 0.82 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.71 | 0.77 |
| Passes per match | 358 | 440 |
| Passes against per match | 376 | 342 |
| Switches of play per match | 16.4 | 13.9 |
| Long balls per match | 31 | 30 |
| Set pieces | Laholm | Åtvidaberg |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.1 | 0.13 |
| Corners per match | 4.2 | 6 |
| Corners against per match | 4.7 | 5.6 |
| xG per corner | 0.04 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.37 | 0.27 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.53 | 0.63 |
| Other | Laholm | Åtvidaberg |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.53 | 0.6 |
| The goalkeepers | Max Johnsson (Laholm) | Hugo Claesson (Åtvidaberg) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 57 | 54 |
| Save % | 60% | 62% |
| xG prevented | 38% | 43% |
| Claims | 163 (93%) | 91 (92%) |
The model gives Åtvidaberg a 42% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Laholm 31%, draw 26%, Åtvidaberg 42%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 10% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 62% and under at 38%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 63% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.