01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Umeå FC or draw (1X)71%
- Over 1.5 goals85%
Swedish Ettan12°21 km/h
Läs på svenskaMarcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work
Umeå FC's possession-focused approach will be tested against FBK Karlstad's counter-attacking and crossing style, with the model giving the hosts a slight edge at 41% to secure victory. Despite this, FBK Karlstad's superior points tally and xPoints suggest they're no strangers to navigating challenges. The head-to-head record since 2023 is limited, with Umeå holding a small advantage at 2W 1D, a sample too small to overshadow current form and expected goals.
Expected goals favor Umeå at 1.93 compared to Karlstad's 1.46, hinting at a competitive clash. Umeå's control-oriented play might suppress Karlstad's counterattack threats, yet the visitor's efficiency in transition could exploit any lapses. In terms of scoring potential, the model forecasts a 66% likelihood for over 2.5 goals and for both teams to find the net, indicating a high-scoring affair is probable.
Betting angles offer intrigue, notably the over 2.5 goals market, reflecting solid value given the match's profile and the generous odds it presents. Keeping an eye on how Umeå's possession strategy copes with Karlstad's defensive resilience will be key. This tactical battle may well produce the most likely scorelines: 1-1 or 2-1 to Umeå.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
No odds available yet.
Head-to-head based on Ettan data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Umeå FC | FBK Karlstad |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 26 | 38 |
| xPoints | 32.9 | 36.3 |
| xG per match | 1.7 | 1.5 |
| xGA per match | 1.6 | 1.3 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.32 | 0.3 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.24 | 0.24 |
| Playing style | Umeå FC | FBK Karlstad |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.33 | 0.34 |
| Field tilt | 0.41 | 0.41 |
| xT per match | 1.3 | 1.5 |
| xTA per match | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 28 | 35 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.43 | 0.48 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.28 | 0.25 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.29 | 0.28 |
| Entries into the box per match | 13 | 15 |
| Entries into the box against | 15 | 12 |
| Pass completion % | 0.78 | 0.71 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.71 | 0.64 |
| Passes per match | 321 | 269 |
| Passes against per match | 358 | 430 |
| Switches of play per match | 17.2 | 19 |
| Long balls per match | 31 | 33 |
| Set pieces | Umeå FC | FBK Karlstad |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.15 | 0.14 |
| Corners per match | 5.9 | 5.3 |
| Corners against per match | 5.7 | 4.3 |
| xG per corner | 0.06 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.05 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.27 | 0.41 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.52 | 0.62 |
| Other | Umeå FC | FBK Karlstad |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.55 | 0.48 |
| The goalkeepers | Pontus Eriksson (Umeå FC) | Vincent Johansson (FBK Karlstad) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 50 | 61 |
| Save % | 68% | 69% |
| xG prevented | 48% | 56% |
| Claims | 65 (92%) | 81 (89%) |
The model gives Umeå FC a 41% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Umeå FC 41%, draw 24%, FBK Karlstad 35%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 10% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 66% and under at 34%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 66% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.