Belgian Pro LeagueJan Breydel Stadion, Brugge11°8 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Cercle BruggeCercle BruggePossession control
    vs
    Royal AntwerpRoyal AntwerpCounter-attacks & crosses
    The model's lean: 1 · Cercle Brugge (46%)

    Cercle Brugge vs Royal Antwerp · Belgian Pro League

    1 · Cercle Brugge 46%X 27%26% Royal Antwerp · 2

    Prediction summary

    BetBuilders AI model prediction for Cercle Brugge vs Royal Antwerp (Belgian Pro League, Saturday, 31 October 2026): Cercle Brugge win 46%, draw 27%, Royal Antwerp win 26%. Expected goals (xG): Cercle Brugge 1.56, Royal Antwerp 1.22. Most likely score: 1-1 (12%). Over 2.5 goals 53%, both teams to score 56%. Double chance: Cercle Brugge or draw 74%, Royal Antwerp or draw 54%. Prediction updated Friday, 23 October 2026.

    Bet on this match

    NordicbetVälkommen in i matchen! Skapa ett konto, gör en insättning och hämta ett gratisspel värt 100 kr plus 50 freespins på Pirots 4.Claim the bonus at Nordicbet
    BetsafeHämta ett 100 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4 när du gör din första insättning hos Betsafe!Claim the bonus at Betsafe
    LeoVegas100 % upp till 600 kr på sport vid första insättningenClaim the bonus at LeoVegas

    18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links

    Analysis: Cercle Brugge – Royal Antwerp

    Anna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work

    TEXT: Five consecutive losses for Royal Antwerp cast a shadow over their historical dominance against Cercle Brugge, where they've claimed victory five times in their last eight encounters. Yet, the present form is starkly different. The model favors the hosts with a win probability of 46%, driven by superior expected goals and expected points metrics. Cercle's possession-based style may expose Antwerp's defensive vulnerabilities, reflected in their xGA per match of 2.1, the worst among the two.

    Cercle Brugge is not without flaws, having just a single win in their recent head-to-head history. However, this small sample size from 2023 weighs less than current form and expected goals, where Cercle leads with a 1.56 to 1.22 advantage. The most likely scorelines are a tight 1-1 or a narrow 1-0 victory, aligning with the model's lean toward the hosts. A high-scoring affair seems plausible with a 53% chance of over 2.5 goals and 56% likelihood for both teams to find the net.

    The contrasting fortunes of these teams set the stage for a potential 2-1 home victory, with the data also pointing to a lean towards over 2.5 goals.

    Cercle BruggeCercle Brugge
    Form LLDLL
    League ranking xG #9xGA #8xT #12xP/match #8Points #17
    Key players
    • Gary Jean MagnéeRWxG 0.06 · xT 0.21
    • Geoffrey KondoCBxG 0.01 · xT 0.15
    • Emmanuel KakouCBxG 0.10 · xT 0.01
    Royal AntwerpRoyal Antwerp
    Form LLLLL
    League ranking xG #10xGA #17xT #9xP/match #16Points #13
    Key players
    • Yuto TsunashimaCBxG 0.05 · xT 0.06
    • Eran TuypensLBxG 0.02 · xT 0.11
    • Rein Van HeldenCBxG 0.03 · xT 0.07

    Match prediction: Cercle Brugge – Royal Antwerp

    Predicted score matrix

    Royal Antwerp →
    Cercle Brugge →
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–06.5%
    0–17.2%
    0–24.6%
    0–31.9%
    0–4+0.7%
    1
    1–09.3%
    1–112.1%
    1–27.2%
    1–32.9%
    1–4+1.2%
    2
    2–07.6%
    2–19.2%
    2–25.6%
    2–32.3%
    2–4+0.9%
    3
    3–03.9%
    3–14.8%
    3–22.9%
    3–31.2%
    3–4+0.5%
    4+
    4+–02.2%
    4+–12.7%
    4+–21.6%
    4+–30.7%
    4+–4+0.3%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-112%
    2. 2.1-09%
    3. 3.2-19%
    4. 4.2-08%
    5. 5.0-17%
    Expected goals
    1,56–1,22
    Both teams to score
    56%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,8
    Under 2,547%
    –
    Over 2,553%
    –

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own →

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Cercle Brugge to win46%
    • Over 1.5 goals77%

    Combined probability

    36%

    Fair odds

    2.81

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Cercle Brugge to win46%
    • Over 2.5 goals53%
    • Viggo Martens to score13%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score56%
    • Over 2.5 goals53%
    • Arthur Denis Vermeeren to score17%
    • Hannes Van der Bruggen to be booked22%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    No odds available yet.

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    8 matches
    Cercle Brugge 1Draw 2Royal Antwerp 5
    Goals: 4–14 (⌀ 2,2)

    Head-to-head based on Belgian Pro League data since 2023.

    Key facts

    • Royal Antwerp FC dominate this fixture historically: 5 wins to 1 in 8 meetings.
    • Royal Antwerp FC have lost 5 in a row.
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Cercle Brugge
    Royal Antwerp
    When goals are scored and conceded — 2026
    Cercle Brugge (9–16)
    Royal Antwerp (12–20)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Cercle Brugge
    Geoffrey Kondo: 273 passningar, xT 0.45KondoEmmanuel Kakou: 196 passningar, xT 0.06KakouIbrahim Diakite: 166 passningar, xT 0.16DiakiteGary Jean Magnée: 160 passningar, xT 1.02MagnéeValy Konaté: 138 passningar, xT 0.84KonatéGaëtan Coucke: 108 passningar, xT 0.23CouckeLukas Hubert Mondele Anzun: 104 passningar, xT 0.3AnzunRoyer Alejandro Caicedo González: 83 passningar, xT 0.08GonzálezViggo Martens: 50 passningar, xT 0.31MartensDante Vanzeir: 45 passningar, xT 0.22VanzeirSteve Ngoura: 39 passningar, xT -0.04Ngoura
    Royal Antwerp
    Álvaro Cortés Moyano: 207 passningar, xT 0.29MoyanoRein Van Helden: 163 passningar, xT 0.18HeldenYuto Tsunashima: 131 passningar, xT 0.22TsunashimaArthur Denis Vermeeren: 124 passningar, xT 0.32VermeerenMaxime Busi: 118 passningar, xT 0.3BusiTaishi Brandon Nozawa: 113 passningar, xT 0.18NozawaChristopher Scott: 74 passningar, xT 0.4ScottModibo Fofana: 73 passningar, xT 0.07FofanaSemm Renders: 72 passningar, xT 0.03RendersThibo Somers: 65 passningar, xT 0.41SomersMichael Frey: 62 passningar, xT 0.18Frey
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Cercle Brugge
    Geoffrey Kondo: 273 passningar, xT 0.45KondoEmmanuel Kakou: 196 passningar, xT 0.06KakouIbrahim Diakite: 166 passningar, xT 0.16DiakiteGary Jean Magnée: 160 passningar, xT 1.02MagnéeValy Konaté: 138 passningar, xT 0.84KonatéGaëtan Coucke: 108 passningar, xT 0.23CouckeLukas Hubert Mondele Anzun: 104 passningar, xT 0.3AnzunRoyer Alejandro Caicedo González: 83 passningar, xT 0.08GonzálezViggo Martens: 50 passningar, xT 0.31MartensDante Vanzeir: 45 passningar, xT 0.22VanzeirSteve Ngoura: 39 passningar, xT -0.04Ngoura
    Royal Antwerp
    Álvaro Cortés Moyano: 207 passningar, xT 0.29MoyanoRein Van Helden: 163 passningar, xT 0.18HeldenYuto Tsunashima: 131 passningar, xT 0.22TsunashimaArthur Denis Vermeeren: 124 passningar, xT 0.32VermeerenMaxime Busi: 118 passningar, xT 0.3BusiTaishi Brandon Nozawa: 113 passningar, xT 0.18NozawaChristopher Scott: 74 passningar, xT 0.4ScottModibo Fofana: 73 passningar, xT 0.07FofanaSemm Renders: 72 passningar, xT 0.03RendersThibo Somers: 65 passningar, xT 0.41SomersMichael Frey: 62 passningar, xT 0.18Frey

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceCercle BruggeRoyal Antwerp
    Points37
    xPoints11.58
    xG per match1.41.3
    xGA per match1.52.1
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.270.23
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.210.33
    Playing styleCercle BruggeRoyal Antwerp
    Build-up efficiency0.310.31
    Field tilt0.420.45
    xT per match0.971.1
    xTA per match1.21.3
    Won balls, offensive half2630
    Pressing intensity0.220.24
    Pressing efficiency0.270.31
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.20.27
    Entries into the box per match1315
    Entries into the box against1317
    Pass completion %0.720.74
    Pass completion % under pressure0.660.7
    Passes per match304328
    Passes against per match438356
    Switches of play per match19.221
    Long balls per match2830
    Set piecesCercle BruggeRoyal Antwerp
    xG from free kicks0.050.04
    Corners per match7.54.8
    Corners against per match4.15.4
    xG per corner0.040.04
    xGA per corner against0.030.05
    First touch, offensive corners %0.370.42
    First touch, defensive corners %0.450.51
    OtherCercle BruggeRoyal Antwerp
    Throw-in control0.650.69
    The goalkeepersGaëtan Coucke (Cercle Brugge)Taishi Brandon Nozawa (Royal Antwerp)
    Saves2031
    Save %57%61%
    xG prevented30%42%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Cercle Brugge vs Royal Antwerp according to our model?

    The model gives Cercle Brugge a 46% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Cercle Brugge 46%, draw 27%, Royal Antwerp 26%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 53% and under at 47%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 56% according to the model.

    How many goals are expected in Cercle Brugge vs Royal Antwerp?

    The model expects 1.56 goals (xG) for Cercle Brugge and 1.22 for Royal Antwerp, 2.78 in total.

    What does the model say about double chance?

    Cercle Brugge or draw (1X) 74%, Royal Antwerp or draw (X2) 54% and no draw (12) 73%.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.