Belgian Pro LeagueBosuilstadion, Antwerpen25°16 km/hUpdated
Läs på svenska
BeverenPossession controlRoyal Antwerp – Beveren · Belgian Pro League
- Anthony ValenciaRWxG 0.22 · xT 0.18
- Gyrano KerkFxG 0.18 · xT 0.09
- Daam FoulonLWBxG 0.03 · xT 0.11
- Sory KabaFxG 0.32 · xT 0.01
- Mathieu MaertensRWxG 0.41 · xT 0.11
- Youssef MazizCAMxG 0.21 · xT 0.15
Match prediction: Royal Antwerp – Beveren
Predicted score matrix
Most likely scorelines
- 1.1-112%
- 2.0-112%
- 3.0-210%
- 4.1-210%
- 5.0-07%
Over/under goals
Expected goals: 2,6Odds & value
The model's value spots
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
- 2 · Beveren53% probability@4.68PinnacleEV+150%
- Over 2.549% probability@2.12PinnacleEV+4%
| Bookmaker | 1 · Royal Antwerp | X | 2 · Beveren |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pinnacle | 1.74 | 3.72 | EV+ 150% 4.68 |
Odds updated 4 Aug, 09:03
Analysis: Royal Antwerp – Beveren
Marcus Johansson · · How the predictions work
Fifty-three percent. That's the surprising probability model favoring SK Beveren in their clash against Royal Antwerp FC, despite the home side's eight-point lead in the standings. This isn't just a casual underdog whisper; the math screams it. Beveren's edge in expected points and their xG per match suggest they're more than capable of turning the tables on Antwerp's home ground. The model's lean towards Beveren, combined with a most likely scoreline favoring an away victory, paints a compelling picture for those willing to ride the wave of probabilistic insight.
SK Beveren, with their possession-based style, shares a tactical philosophy with Royal Antwerp FC, yet they seem to extract more value from their gameplay. Their xPoints of 56.2 shadow Antwerp's 51.3, a nod to efficiency and effectiveness. With an expected goals tally of 1.67 against Antwerp's 0.96, Beveren appears primed to capitalize on any defensive lapses from the home side. However, Antwerp's defensive edge, with a slightly lower xGA, can't be dismissed entirely, suggesting a potentially gritty contest.
Royal Antwerp FC might enjoy a points advantage in the league table, yet numbers suggest that the true battleground will be their ability to suppress Beveren's xG superiority. Both teams will likely vie to control the game, but the real question is who can convert possession into precision. The model hints at a probable draw at 1-1, but there's an enticing narrative being spun for Beveren, possibly edging it 1-0 or 2-0 if they can translate their statistical advantage into reality.
And here's where the smart money lies: with Pinnacle offering odds of 4.68 on a Beveren win, there's a robust 150% value edge based on the model's 53% favorability for the visitors. For those eyeing goal markets, the over 2.5 at odds of 2.12 offers a modest 4% edge. But make no mistake, the sharpest angle is backing Beveren to topple the odds and deliver on their statistical promise.
Statistics
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
The teams in numbers
| Performance | Royal Antwerp | Beveren |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 48 | 40 |
| xPoints | 51.3 | 56.2 |
| xG per match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| xGA per match | 1.4 | 1.5 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.22 | 0.26 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.26 | 0.21 |
| Playing style | Royal Antwerp | Beveren |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.3 | 0.31 |
| Field tilt | 0.42 | 0.4 |
| xT per match | 0.92 | 0.96 |
| xTA per match | 1 | 1 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 25 | 25 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.3 | 0.27 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.31 | 0.31 |
| Entries into the box per match | 11 | 12 |
| Entries into the box against | 14 | 15 |
| Pass completion % | 0.75 | 0.73 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| Passes per match | 318 | 287 |
| Passes against per match | 333 | 354 |
| Switches of play per match | 24 | 24 |
| Long balls per match | 31 | 34 |
| Set pieces | Royal Antwerp | Beveren |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.08 | 0.13 |
| Corners per match | 4.6 | 4.8 |
| Corners against per match | 4.7 | 6.3 |
| xG per corner | 0.04 | 0.06 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.04 | 0.05 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.39 | 0.46 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.52 | 0.58 |
| Other | Royal Antwerp | Beveren |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.67 | 0.64 |
| The goalkeepers | Taishi Brandon Nozawa (Royal Antwerp) | Beveren |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 97 | – |
| Save % | 74% | – |
| xG prevented | 52% | – |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | – |
Frequently asked questions
Who wins Royal Antwerp vs Beveren according to our model?
The model gives Beveren a 53% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Royal Antwerp 23%, draw 24%, Beveren 53%.
What is the most likely scoreline?
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
Over or under 2.5 goals?
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 49% and under at 51%.
Will both teams score?
The probability of both teams scoring is 50% according to the model.
Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
More matches in the league
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.