EFL ChampionshipBramall Lane, Sheffield18°10 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Sheffield UnitedSheffield UnitedLow block & direct
    vs
    WolverhamptonWolverhamptonPossession control
    The model's lean: 2 · Wolverhampton (44%)Best value by the model: Under 2,5 @ 2.28 (+16 %)

    Sheffield UnitedWolverhampton · EFL Championship

    1 · Sheffield United 29%X 27%44% Wolverhampton · 2

    Analysis: Sheffield UnitedWolverhampton

    Anna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work

    In this clash, Wolverhampton's possession control faces off against Sheffield United's direct approach. This contrast in style sets the stage for a fascinating dynamic at Bramall Lane. Wolves, favored by the model with a 44% chance of winning, are equipped to dictate the tempo. The hosts, on the other hand, can capitalize on any lapses by launching swift counter-attacks. Despite Sheffield's slight edge in points, Wolves' superior expected goals per game (1.8 to 1.1) and tighter defense (1.1 xGA versus 1.8 xGA for the Blades) suggest they may have the upper hand in open play.

    A small sample size of head-to-head encounters suggests caution in relying heavily on these meetings to forecast the outcome. However, the expected goals figures lean toward a closely fought battle. The model's most likely scoreline, 1-1 at 13%, reflects the hosts' capacity to find the net against a sturdy visiting defense, though Wolves holding out for a 0-1 victory (10%) or edging a 1-2 win (9%) are also in play.

    The over/under line at 2.5 goals sits finely balanced with a 49% lean towards over, indicating a cautious approach might be wise for the total goals market. Both teams finding the net is a touch more probable at 54%, reflecting their attacking prowess.

    For punters seeking value, the model suggests Wolverhampton's win probability is priced generously at odds of 2.30 with Bet365. This, coupled with Wolves' stronger xPoints of 8.6 compared to Sheffield's 7.9, provides a sharp angle worth consideration. While nothing is certain, the visitors, with their possession-oriented edge, seem poised to exploit any defensive frailties, potentially leaving Bramall Lane with three points.

    Sheffield UnitedSheffield United
    Form DDWLW
    League ranking xG #18xGA #22xT #24xP/match #15Points #11
    Key players
    • Tom CannonFxG 0.34 · xT 0.00
    • Callum OhareLWxG 0.08 · xT 0.02
    • Sydie PeckCAMxG 0.13 · xT 0.07
    WolverhamptonWolverhampton
    Form DWWLD
    League ranking xG #5xGA #5xT #5xP/match #3Points #13
    Key players
    • Fer LópezRWxG 0.36 · xT 0.22
    • Marshall MunetsiFxG 0.14 · xT -0.02
    • Toti GomesCBxG 0.03 · xT 0.06

    Match prediction: Sheffield UnitedWolverhampton

    Predicted score matrix

    Wolverhampton
    Sheffield United
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–07.5%
    0–19.7%
    0–27.1%
    0–33.3%
    0–4+1.6%
    1
    1–08.5%
    1–112.8%
    1–28.7%
    1–34.1%
    1–4+1.9%
    2
    2–05.4%
    2–17.6%
    2–25.4%
    2–32.5%
    2–4+1.2%
    3
    3–02.2%
    3–13.1%
    3–22.2%
    3–31.0%
    3–4+0.5%
    4+
    4+–00.9%
    4+–11.3%
    4+–20.9%
    4+–30.4%
    4+–4+0.2%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-113%
    2. 2.0-110%
    3. 3.1-29%
    4. 4.1-08%
    5. 5.2-18%
    Expected goals
    1,231,40
    Both teams to score
    54%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,6
    Under 2,551%
    @2.28EV+16%
    Over 2,549%
    @1.70

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Wolverhampton or draw (X2)67%
    • Under 3.5 goals73%

    Combined probability

    49%

    Fair odds

    2.04

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Wolverhampton or draw (X2)67%
    • Under 2.5 goals51%
    • Raúl Alonso Jiménez Rodríguez to score20%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score54%
    • Over 2.5 goals49%
    • Patrick James Bamford to score20%
    • André Trindade da Costa Neto to be booked23%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • Under 2.551% probability@2.28Betfair ExchangeEV+16%reference odds
    • Under 1.526% probability@4.50Paddy PowerEV+16%reference odds
    • Under 2.551% probability@2.20Paddy PowerEV+12%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · Sheffield UnitedX2 · Wolverhampton
    Betfair Exchange3.102.94
    EV+ 1%
    2.28
    Paddy Power2.883.502.15
    Pinnacle3.493.522.08

    Odds updated 11 Sept, 16:32

    Odds movement

    Market signal

    The market has moved clearly towards an Wolverhampton win since 9 September — the odds have shortened from 2.37 to 2.08 (−12%).

    1+18 %
    35 %25 %

    2.953.49

    X+3 %
    32 %22 %

    3.413.52

    2-12 %
    48 %38 %

    2.372.08

    Over 2,5-4 %
    60 %50 %

    1.771.70

    Pinnacle · 8 recorded price levels · 09/09/2026 → 11/09/2026 · fixed scale 10 percentage points

    Statistics

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Sheffield United
    Wolverhampton
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Sheffield United (88)
    Wolverhampton (1310)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Sheffield United
    Japhet Tanganga: 161 passningar, xT 0.15TangangaSydie Peck: 150 passningar, xT 0.26PeckSam Mccallum: 116 passningar, xT 0.49MccallumHamza Choudhury: 93 passningar, xT 0.24ChoudhuryMichael Cooper: 87 passningar, xT 0.32CooperLiam Kitching: 78 passningar, xT 0.05KitchingMark Mcguinness: 56 passningar, xT 0.03McguinnessJaïro Jocquim Riedewald: 50 passningar, xT -0.03RiedewaldRomelle Troy Donovan: 49 passningar, xT -0.04DonovanBen Brereton Diaz: 49 passningar, xT 0.17DiazKalvin Mark Phillips: 49 passningar, xT -0.04Phillips
    Wolverhampton
    Toti Gomes: 264 passningar, xT 0.26GomesFer López: 216 passningar, xT 0.55LópezNasser Djiga: 200 passningar, xT 0.19DjigaAndré: 183 passningar, xT 0.44AndréHugo Bueno: 174 passningar, xT 0.8BuenoJackson Tchatchoua: 141 passningar, xT 0.55TchatchouaJosé Sá: 131 passningar, xT 0.05Yerson Mosquera: 79 passningar, xT 0.04MosqueraTommy Doyle: 69 passningar, xT 0.01DoyleRodrigo Gomes: 58 passningar, xT 0.45GomesMateus Mané: 57 passningar, xT 0.59Mané
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Sheffield United
    Japhet Tanganga: 161 passningar, xT 0.15TangangaSydie Peck: 150 passningar, xT 0.26PeckSam Mccallum: 116 passningar, xT 0.49MccallumHamza Choudhury: 93 passningar, xT 0.24ChoudhuryMichael Cooper: 87 passningar, xT 0.32CooperLiam Kitching: 78 passningar, xT 0.05KitchingMark Mcguinness: 56 passningar, xT 0.03McguinnessJaïro Jocquim Riedewald: 50 passningar, xT -0.03RiedewaldRomelle Troy Donovan: 49 passningar, xT -0.04DonovanBen Brereton Diaz: 49 passningar, xT 0.17DiazKalvin Mark Phillips: 49 passningar, xT -0.04Phillips
    Wolverhampton
    Toti Gomes: 264 passningar, xT 0.26GomesFer López: 216 passningar, xT 0.55LópezNasser Djiga: 200 passningar, xT 0.19DjigaAndré: 183 passningar, xT 0.44AndréHugo Bueno: 174 passningar, xT 0.8BuenoJackson Tchatchoua: 141 passningar, xT 0.55TchatchouaJosé Sá: 131 passningar, xT 0.05Yerson Mosquera: 79 passningar, xT 0.04MosqueraTommy Doyle: 69 passningar, xT 0.01DoyleRodrigo Gomes: 58 passningar, xT 0.45GomesMateus Mané: 57 passningar, xT 0.59Mané

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceSheffield UnitedWolverhampton
    Points98
    xPoints7.98.6
    xG per match1.11.8
    xGA per match1.81.1
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.120.37
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.150.06
    Playing styleSheffield UnitedWolverhampton
    Build-up efficiency0.340.29
    Field tilt0.350.5
    xT per match0.491.2
    xTA per match1.20.77
    Won balls, offensive half2724
    Pressing intensity0.250.23
    Pressing efficiency0.30.31
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.30.23
    Entries into the box per match914
    Entries into the box against1313
    Pass completion %0.650.79
    Pass completion % under pressure0.630.69
    Passes per match245383
    Passes against per match400315
    Switches of play per match14.429.3
    Long balls per match2630
    Set piecesSheffield UnitedWolverhampton
    xG from free kicks0.060.05
    Corners per match3.75.4
    Corners against per match7.35
    xG per corner0.040.02
    xGA per corner against0.020.06
    First touch, offensive corners %0.270.48
    First touch, defensive corners %0.690.6
    OtherSheffield UnitedWolverhampton
    Throw-in control0.680.73
    The goalkeepersMichael Cooper (Sheffield United)Marshall Munetsi (Wolverhampton)
    Saves229
    Save %73%100%
    xG prevented53%100%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Sheffield United vs Wolverhampton according to our model?

    The model gives Wolverhampton a 44% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Sheffield United 29%, draw 27%, Wolverhampton 44%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 49% and under at 51%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 54% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.