01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Leicester City or draw (X2)63%
- Over 1.5 goals82%
EFL League OneOakwell, Barnsley12°3,2 mm23 km/h
Läs på svenskaAnna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work
With Leicester City slightly edging Barnsley in the model's razor-thin probability, this matchup promises to pivot on a delicate balance of possession control versus high pressing. Barnsley, playing at home, holds a slender advantage in points and xPoints, reflecting a more consistent conversion of expected goals into actual results. Yet, the visitors' high press could disrupt the hosts' rhythm, creating a tense struggle in the midfield.
The expected goals (xG) numbers tell a compelling story. Barnsley's higher xG per match of 1.7 suggests they might carve out more goal-scoring opportunities, supported by their possession-based style. However, Leicester's defensive edge with an xGA of 1.2 demonstrates their ability to withstand pressure, potentially neutralizing Barnsley's attacking threat. The most likely scorelines, 1-1 and 1-2, reflect this tug-of-war, indicating a match that could easily tilt in either direction.
Both teams to score is a solid 62%, hinting at the likelihood of an open game where chances are exchanged at both ends. The model leans towards Leicester, but not overwhelmingly, suggesting that the visitors might capitalize on quick transitions and high pressing. Despite Leicester's inferior xPoints and xG tallies, their defensive solidity could offer them the breather needed to exploit Barnsley on the counter.
For bettors, the over 2.5 goals probability at 59% seems particularly enticing, taking into account the attacking profiles and vulnerabilities of both sides, aligning well with the model's expectation of a lively encounter. While Barnsley might seem to hold the edge at first glance, Leicester's knack for disrupting possession and countering swiftly could see them edge a tight contest, possibly 2-1.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
No odds available yet.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Barnsley | Leicester City |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 7 | 5 |
| xPoints | 7.2 | 4.9 |
| xG per match | 1.7 | 1.3 |
| xGA per match | 1.3 | 1.2 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.31 | 0.24 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.22 | 0.21 |
| Playing style | Barnsley | Leicester City |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.34 | 0.29 |
| Field tilt | 0.58 | 0.71 |
| xT per match | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| xTA per match | 0.89 | 0.69 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 25 | 19 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.48 | 0.37 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.52 | 0.31 |
| Entries into the box per match | 17 | 15 |
| Entries into the box against | 10 | 8 |
| Pass completion % | 0.65 | 0.82 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.59 | 0.76 |
| Passes per match | 281 | 545 |
| Passes against per match | 170 | 198 |
| Switches of play per match | 20.5 | 18.1 |
| Long balls per match | 30 | 22 |
| Set pieces | Barnsley | Leicester City |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.06 | 0.03 |
| Corners per match | 8.9 | 6.8 |
| Corners against per match | 3.4 | 4.8 |
| xG per corner | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.6 | 0.35 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.59 | 0.67 |
| Other | Barnsley | Leicester City |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.65 | 0.78 |
| The goalkeepers | Rogan Ravenhill (Barnsley) | Alex Simon McCarthy (Leicester City) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 8 | 11 |
| Save % | 50% | 61% |
| xG prevented | 24% | 28% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Leicester City a 38% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Barnsley 36%, draw 25%, Leicester City 38%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 59% and under at 41%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 62% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.