01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Huddersfield Town to win56%
- Under 3.5 goals72%
EFL League OneHayes Lane, Bromley15°7,2 mm15 km/h
Läs på svenskaErik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
TEXT: Huddersfield's 1.76 expected goals compared to Bromley's 0.93 is the key statistic here. The visitors' higher xG underscores their capability to create quality chances, while the hosts struggle both in attack and defense. With an xGA of 2.1, Bromley is leaking goals, facing a side that has netted in 14 straight games.
Bromley has hit a rough patch, losing three consecutive matches, and their point tally of just four starkly contrasts with Huddersfield's 11. The visitors are unbeaten in six league matches, reflecting their current form superiority. While Bromley prefers a defensively cautious approach, Huddersfield's control-focused playstyle and scoring run suggest they will dominate possession and likely break through Bromley's defense.
The model leans towards Huddersfield with a 56% probability of victory. The most probable scorelines are 0-1 and 0-2, both favoring the visitors. Bet365 offers Huddersfield to win at 1.80, which represents potential value given the underlying metrics. The over/under sits at an even 50%, suggesting no clear lean toward a high- or low-scoring affair. Look for a disciplined Huddersfield side to secure a win, perhaps with a 0-1 or 0-2 result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
No odds available yet.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Bromley | Huddersfield Town |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 4 | 11 |
| xPoints | 5 | 9.2 |
| xG per match | 0.78 | 1.9 |
| xGA per match | 2.1 | 1 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.11 | 0.42 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.65 | 0.11 |
| Playing style | Bromley | Huddersfield Town |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.38 | 0.3 |
| Field tilt | 0.35 | 0.45 |
| xT per match | 0.61 | 1 |
| xTA per match | 1.2 | 0.87 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 28 | 25 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.21 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.3 | 0.28 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.26 | 0.24 |
| Entries into the box per match | 8 | 12 |
| Entries into the box against | 15 | 11 |
| Pass completion % | 0.54 | 0.69 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.52 | 0.66 |
| Passes per match | 155 | 287 |
| Passes against per match | 344 | 325 |
| Switches of play per match | 13.9 | 17 |
| Long balls per match | 32 | 30 |
| Set pieces | Bromley | Huddersfield Town |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.03 | 0.05 |
| Corners per match | 2.5 | 5 |
| Corners against per match | 5.9 | 3.6 |
| xG per corner | 0.01 | 0.05 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.07 | 0.06 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.23 | 0.28 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.47 | 0.61 |
| Other | Bromley | Huddersfield Town |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| The goalkeepers | Shamal Tyrell George (Bromley) | Matthew Young (Huddersfield Town) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 27 | 9 |
| Save % | 66% | 69% |
| xG prevented | 47% | 37% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Huddersfield Town a 56% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Bromley 21%, draw 23%, Huddersfield Town 56%.
The model's most likely final score is 0-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 50% and under at 50%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 50% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.