01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Wycombe Wanderers or draw (X2)72%
- Over 1.5 goals77%
EFL League OneBloomfield Road, Blackpool17°0,1 mm23 km/h
Läs på svenskaSofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work
Blackpool may be riding a wave of four consecutive victories, but numbers suggest a sterner challenge from Wycombe Wanderers at Bloomfield Road. Despite Blackpool's recent form, the model paints a broader picture favoring Wycombe, who command a 44% probability of victory compared to Blackpool's 30%. Wycombe has been the more consistent squad, underlined by a superior points tally and a hefty edge in expected points (xPoints) at 74.5 versus Blackpool's 56.1.
Wycombe Wanderers emerge as the dominant force in terms of expected goals (xG), averaging 1.6 per match against Blackpool's 1.1. Their possession-based approach could unravel Blackpool's direct style. With an xGA of just 1.0, Wycombe also outclass Blackpool defensively, a team that concedes 1.5 xGA per game. The historical head-to-head is limited to a mere four matches, where Blackpool has managed a win and three draws. However, a small sample size like this holds little sway against current form and statistical insights.
1-1 is the most likely scoreline at 12%, but the model's lean towards a 0-1 or 1-2 finish for Wycombe (both at 9%) is hard to ignore. Over 2.5 goals is a slight favorite at 53%, while a 56% chance of both teams scoring indicates a competitive affair. Yet, with weather conditions such as rain and strong wind potentially in play, goal-scoring could dip, a factor already accounted for in the model's forecast.
Wycombe fans should feel buoyed not just by the probabilities and model numbers but by the value on offer. Pinnacle provides compelling odds of 2.71 for a Wycombe win, offering an 18% edge given the model's valuation. Betsafe and Betsson also present opportunities at 2.62, each delivering a 15% edge. If you're looking for an angle with a calculated edge, backing Wycombe on the road seems the shrewdest play.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Blackpool | X | 2 · Wycombe Wanderers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 2.52 | 3.20 | EV+ 19% 2.72 |
| Betsson | 2.52 | 3.20 | EV+ 19% 2.72 |
| Nordicbet | 2.52 | 3.20 | EV+ 19% 2.72 |
| Pinnacle | 2.65 | 3.33 | EV+ 20% 2.75 |
Odds updated 15 Aug, 10:23
2.62 → 2.65
3.25 → 3.33
2.71 → 2.75
1.96 → 1.97
Pinnacle · 6 recorded price levels · 11/08/2026 → 15/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on League One data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Blackpool | Wycombe Wanderers |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 60 | 63 |
| xPoints | 56.1 | 74.5 |
| xG per match | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| xGA per match | 1.5 | 1 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.21 | 0.25 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.26 | 0.2 |
| Playing style | Blackpool | Wycombe Wanderers |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.32 | 0.33 |
| Field tilt | 0.38 | 0.56 |
| xT per match | 0.67 | 1.1 |
| xTA per match | 0.96 | 0.78 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 23 | 26 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.22 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.33 | 0.34 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.34 | 0.37 |
| Entries into the box per match | 10 | 13 |
| Entries into the box against | 12 | 10 |
| Pass completion % | 0.67 | 0.71 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.63 | 0.67 |
| Passes per match | 255 | 334 |
| Passes against per match | 314 | 282 |
| Switches of play per match | 20.9 | 22.6 |
| Long balls per match | 29 | 36 |
| Set pieces | Blackpool | Wycombe Wanderers |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Corners per match | 4.2 | 5.5 |
| Corners against per match | 5.6 | 4.6 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.07 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.06 | 0.04 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.46 | 0.43 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.66 | 0.62 |
| Other | Blackpool | Wycombe Wanderers |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| The goalkeepers | Bailey Peacock Farrell (Blackpool) | Will Norris (Wycombe Wanderers) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 126 | 70 |
| Save % | 67% | 63% |
| xG prevented | 48% | 40% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Wycombe Wanderers a 44% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Blackpool 30%, draw 26%, Wycombe Wanderers 44%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 53% and under at 47%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 56% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.