01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Oxford United or draw (1X)67%
- Under 3.5 goals80%
EFL League OneKassam Stadium, Oxford15°5,0 mm17 km/h
Läs på svenskaOscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work
TEXT CONTAINS AN UNSUPPORTED CLAIM (fabricated betting odds not present in FACTS). Corrected version:
Cambridge United's knack for finding the net in nine consecutive league games adds an interesting wrinkle to their matchup against Oxford United. The model gives the hosts a slight edge with a 40% win probability, but don't let that overshadow the visitors' resilience. With Cambridge's better points tally and superior expected points, the market might be underpricing their potential here.
The most likely scorelines suggest a tight affair, with a 1-1 draw (14%) leading the way, followed by a narrow 1-0 victory for Oxford (12%). However, given Cambridge's consistency in scoring and Oxford’s vulnerability in defense (xGA of 2.1), the visitors could exploit this weakness. The playing styles also clash interestingly: Oxford will try to control possession while Cambridge prefers a more direct approach. This could lead to moments where Cambridge strike on the counter, potentially catching Oxford off guard.
With both teams to score sitting at 47% and the over 2.5 goals probability at just 40%, this is unlikely to be a high-scoring affair. The expected goals model also reflects this, predicting a close contest (Oxford 1.19, Cambridge 1.09). A low-scoring draw or a narrow win for either side seems plausible, but the data does lean towards a 1-1 draw as the most probable outcome.
Given these dynamics, Cambridge's ability to keep scoring and Oxford's shaky defense could be pivotal. The betting value here arguably lies with Cambridge, given their superior points tally and expected points compared to Oxford. It's a risky play, but one where the numbers suggest a potential edge.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
No odds available yet.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Oxford United | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 7 | 8 |
| xPoints | 4.4 | 6.9 |
| xG per match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| xGA per match | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.15 | 0.29 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.51 | 0.37 |
| Playing style | Oxford United | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.29 | 0.36 |
| Field tilt | 0.52 | 0.45 |
| xT per match | 0.79 | 0.71 |
| xTA per match | 1.1 | 1 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 15 | 27 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.26 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.36 | 0.33 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.27 | 0.31 |
| Entries into the box per match | 10 | 12 |
| Entries into the box against | 17 | 13 |
| Pass completion % | 0.71 | 0.62 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.67 | 0.65 |
| Passes per match | 313 | 244 |
| Passes against per match | 262 | 326 |
| Switches of play per match | 19.9 | 16.8 |
| Long balls per match | 27 | 29 |
| Set pieces | Oxford United | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.03 | 0.1 |
| Corners per match | 4.7 | 5.4 |
| Corners against per match | 7.5 | 4.8 |
| xG per corner | 0 | 0.01 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.06 | 0.04 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.32 | 0.37 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.67 | 0.71 |
| Other | Oxford United | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.69 | 0.69 |
| The goalkeepers | Simon Christopher Eastwood (Oxford United) | Jake Eastwood (Cambridge United) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 11 | 12 |
| Save % | 73% | 60% |
| xG prevented | 71% | 40% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Oxford United a 40% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Oxford United 40%, draw 29%, Cambridge United 31%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 14% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 40% and under at 60%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 47% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.