01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Peterborough United or draw (1X)68%
- Under 3.5 goals77%
EFL League OneWeston Homes Stadium, Peterborough15°1,6 mm15 km/h
Läs på svenska18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Oscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work
A clash of possession-focused philosophies awaits as Peterborough United hosts Notts County. While both teams treasure the ball, the model slightly favors the hosts with a 41% chance for victory. Yet, it's Notts County who holds the edge in the standings with 7 points to Peterborough's 5, and an even wider lead in expected points. There's tension in these contrasting indicators.
Despite Peterborough’s slight edge in expected goals, creating 1.3 per game compared to Notts County’s 1.1, their defensive frailties are evident. The hosts concede an average of 1.6 xGA per match—worse than the visitors' 1.3. This vulnerability might just tip the scales towards a close encounter, where the visitors could capitalize on lapses in United’s defensive setup.
The probabilities and likely scorelines signal a tightly contested match with a 1-1 draw emerging as the most probable result at 13%. The model’s numbers suggest a narrow margin, pointing to a set-piece or a moment of brilliance being decisive. With only a 44% chance of the game going over 2.5 goals, it projects a strategically cautious affair rather than an open, high-scoring one.
If there's value here, it’s in looking at the betting market. With Notts County priced at 3.25 by William Hill, there’s potential value for punters siding with an away upset. The slim difference in xG and a more robust defense might enable the visitors to snatch a 0-1 victory, despite the model’s lean towards Peterborough. This matchup, underpinned by control and patience, might just pivot on a single moment of incisive play.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
No odds available yet.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Peterborough United | Notts County |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 5 | 7 |
| xPoints | 7.9 | 10.1 |
| xG per match | 1.3 | 1.1 |
| xGA per match | 1.6 | 1.3 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.24 | 0.11 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.33 | 0.2 |
| Playing style | Peterborough United | Notts County |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.29 | 0.3 |
| Field tilt | 0.59 | 0.42 |
| xT per match | 1.2 | 0.64 |
| xTA per match | 0.98 | 0.96 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 23 | 26 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.22 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.39 | 0.35 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.36 | 0.3 |
| Entries into the box per match | 13 | 11 |
| Entries into the box against | 11 | 13 |
| Pass completion % | 0.76 | 0.69 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.71 | 0.67 |
| Passes per match | 413 | 270 |
| Passes against per match | 252 | 344 |
| Switches of play per match | 19.5 | 13.2 |
| Long balls per match | 30 | 23 |
| Set pieces | Peterborough United | Notts County |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.01 | 0.06 |
| Corners per match | 5.5 | 4.4 |
| Corners against per match | 4.9 | 5 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.04 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.05 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.62 | 0.42 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.5 | 0.77 |
| Other | Peterborough United | Notts County |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.74 | 0.72 |
| The goalkeepers | Alexander Michael Bass (Peterborough United) | James Belshaw (Notts County) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 22 | 15 |
| Save % | 67% | 65% |
| xG prevented | 30% | 47% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Peterborough United a 41% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Peterborough United 41%, draw 27%, Notts County 32%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 44% and under at 56%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 50% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

250 kr gratisspel plus freespins
Hämta bonus
100 kr gratisspel plus freespins
Hämta bonus
100 kr gratisspel plus freespins
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.