EFL League OneHome Park, Plymouth17°22 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Plymouth ArgylePlymouth ArgyleLow block & direct
    vs
    BarnsleyBarnsleyPossession control
    The model's lean: 1 · Plymouth Argyle (44%)Best value by the model: 2 · Barnsley @ 4.62 (+29 %)

    Plymouth ArgyleBarnsley · EFL League One

    1 · Plymouth Argyle 44%X 28%28% Barnsley · 2

    Analysis: Plymouth ArgyleBarnsley

    Oscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work

    Plymouth Argyle's 44% win probability suggests a subtle edge over Barnsley, yet the real intrigue lies in the model's under-the-surface dynamics. While the hosts lean on a low defence and direct approach, Barnsley thrive on possession. This stylistic clash could lead to a tightly contested affair, with the numbers hinting at a slender margin for the home side.

    Despite the small sample size of their head-to-head encounters since 2023, which stands at one win apiece, the expected goals (xG) metrics reveal more. Plymouth averages 1.5 xG per match, slightly behind Barnsley's 1.7. However, their ability to generate 0.48 xG within eight seconds of regaining possession is notable and crucial against Barnsley's control-heavy style. This indicates potential for quick counterattacks by the hosts.

    Defensively, Plymouth concedes more on paper with 1.6 xGA compared to Barnsley's 1.3. This could be a key factor, especially given the model's 1.33 to 1.30 expected goals in Plymouth's favour. A 1-1 draw emerges as the most probable scoreline, with both teams likely to find the net at a 54% probability. Yet, with an almost even split for over 2.5 goals at 49%, the forecast leans towards a cagey match.

    The under 2.5 goals market stands out as a sharp angle, with value odds at 2.48 offered by Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet. The model rates this outcome at 51%, presenting a 27% edge. This suggests that anticipating a low-scoring contest could be profitable, aligning with the playing styles and defensive metrics. Expect a narrow 1-0 win for Plymouth or a 1-1 draw, with the under 2.5 goals bet carrying the most potential.

    Plymouth ArgylePlymouth Argyle
    Form LDWLW
    League ranking xG #10xGA #17xT #15xP/match #6Points #11
    Key players
    • Aribusitamunoipirim Emmanuel PeppleFxG 0.58 · xT -0.03
    • Bradley Ryan IbrahimFxG 0.14 · xT 0.05
    • Xavier Casmier AmaechiRWxG 0.20 · xT 0.00
    BarnsleyBarnsley
    Form LDWWL
    League ranking xG #8xGA #12xT #11xP/match #10Points #10
    Key players
    • Reyes Demar Uriah ClearyLWxG 0.27 · xT 0.27
    • Tyrese NoslinRWBxG 0.22 · xT 0.15
    • Luca John ConnellCMxG 0.10 · xT 0.24

    Match prediction: Plymouth ArgyleBarnsley

    Predicted score matrix

    Barnsley
    Plymouth Argyle
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–07.6%
    0–19.0%
    0–26.1%
    0–32.6%
    0–4+1.1%
    1
    1–09.2%
    1–112.8%
    1–28.1%
    1–33.5%
    1–4+1.5%
    2
    2–06.4%
    2–18.3%
    2–25.4%
    2–32.3%
    2–4+1.0%
    3
    3–02.8%
    3–13.7%
    3–22.4%
    3–31.0%
    3–4+0.4%
    4+
    4+–01.2%
    4+–11.6%
    4+–21.1%
    4+–30.5%
    4+–4+0.2%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-113%
    2. 2.1-09%
    3. 3.0-19%
    4. 4.2-18%
    5. 5.1-28%
    Expected goals
    1,331,30
    Both teams to score
    54%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,6
    Under 2,551%
    @2.48EV+27%
    Over 2,549%
    @1.50

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Plymouth Argyle or draw (1X)64%
    • Under 3.5 goals73%

    Combined probability

    47%

    Fair odds

    2.12

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Plymouth Argyle or draw (1X)64%
    • Under 2.5 goals51%
    • William Albert Evans to score22%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score54%
    • Over 2.5 goals49%
    • Patrick John Kelly to score22%
    • Sam Rodin Gale to be booked21%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 2 · Barnsley28% probability@4.62PinnacleEV+29%reference odds
    • Under 2.551% probability@2.48BetsafeEV+27%reference odds
    • Under 2.551% probability@2.48BetssonEV+27%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · Plymouth ArgyleX2 · Barnsley
    Betsafe1.65
    EV+ 12%
    4.05
    EV+ 23%
    4.40
    Betsson1.65
    EV+ 12%
    4.05
    EV+ 23%
    4.40
    Nordicbet1.65
    EV+ 12%
    4.05
    EV+ 23%
    4.40
    Pinnacle1.66
    EV+ 18%
    4.27
    EV+ 29%
    4.62

    Odds updated 11 Sept, 16:32

    Odds movement

    Market signal

    The market has moved clearly towards a Plymouth Argyle win since 6 September — the odds have shortened from 1.79 to 1.66 (−7%).

    1-7 %
    60 %50 %

    1.791.66

    X+8 %
    28 %18 %

    3.954.27

    2+16 %
    27 %17 %

    3.994.62

    Pinnacle · 12 recorded price levels · 06/09/2026 → 11/09/2026 · fixed scale 10 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    2 matches
    Plymouth Argyle 1Draw 0Barnsley 1
    Goals: 43 (⌀ 3,5)

    Head-to-head based on League One data since 2023.

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Plymouth Argyle
    Barnsley
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Plymouth Argyle (78)
    Barnsley (68)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Plymouth Argyle
    Harvey David White: 148 passningar, xT 0.67WhiteWesley Nathan Hylton Harding: 122 passningar, xT 0.74HardingAlex Duncan Hartridge: 102 passningar, xT 0.41HartridgeJulio Pleguezuelo: 98 passningar, xT 0.17PleguezueloAlexander Paul Mitchell: 80 passningar, xT 0.31MitchellMurphy Joseph Mahoney Cooper: 78 passningar, xT 0.25CooperRonan Curtis: 68 passningar, xT 0.78CurtisTyreeq Jamal Adeshina Oliveira Bakinson: 62 passningar, xT -0.09BakinsonMathias Ross Jensen: 49 passningar, xT 0.22JensenBradley Ryan Ibrahim: 44 passningar, xT 0.12IbrahimMatthew Alexander Sorinola: 41 passningar, xT 0.24Sorinola
    Barnsley
    Sam Rodin Gale: 197 passningar, xT 0.47GaleArley Kay: 164 passningar, xT 0.4KayTyrese Noslin: 145 passningar, xT 0.65NoslinCameron Alexander McGeehan: 127 passningar, xT 0.03McGeehanRogan Ravenhill: 118 passningar, xT 0.07RavenhillLuca John Connell: 111 passningar, xT 0.51ConnellJosh Earl: 96 passningar, xT 0.27EarlPatrick John Kelly: 94 passningar, xT 0.58KellyJonathan Patrick Richard Bland: 92 passningar, xT 0.16BlandConnor Oriordan: 87 passningar, xT 0.16OriordanLuke William Alker: 49 passningar, xT 0.01Alker
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Plymouth Argyle
    Harvey David White: 148 passningar, xT 0.67WhiteWesley Nathan Hylton Harding: 122 passningar, xT 0.74HardingAlex Duncan Hartridge: 102 passningar, xT 0.41HartridgeJulio Pleguezuelo: 98 passningar, xT 0.17PleguezueloAlexander Paul Mitchell: 80 passningar, xT 0.31MitchellMurphy Joseph Mahoney Cooper: 78 passningar, xT 0.25CooperRonan Curtis: 68 passningar, xT 0.78CurtisTyreeq Jamal Adeshina Oliveira Bakinson: 62 passningar, xT -0.09BakinsonMathias Ross Jensen: 49 passningar, xT 0.22JensenBradley Ryan Ibrahim: 44 passningar, xT 0.12IbrahimMatthew Alexander Sorinola: 41 passningar, xT 0.24Sorinola
    Barnsley
    Sam Rodin Gale: 197 passningar, xT 0.47GaleArley Kay: 164 passningar, xT 0.4KayTyrese Noslin: 145 passningar, xT 0.65NoslinCameron Alexander McGeehan: 127 passningar, xT 0.03McGeehanRogan Ravenhill: 118 passningar, xT 0.07RavenhillLuca John Connell: 111 passningar, xT 0.51ConnellJosh Earl: 96 passningar, xT 0.27EarlPatrick John Kelly: 94 passningar, xT 0.58KellyJonathan Patrick Richard Bland: 92 passningar, xT 0.16BlandConnor Oriordan: 87 passningar, xT 0.16OriordanLuke William Alker: 49 passningar, xT 0.01Alker

    The teams in numbers

    PerformancePlymouth ArgyleBarnsley
    Points77
    xPoints7.97.2
    xG per match1.51.7
    xGA per match1.61.3
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.480.31
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.350.22
    Playing stylePlymouth ArgyleBarnsley
    Build-up efficiency0.30.34
    Field tilt0.420.58
    xT per match0.911.1
    xTA per match1.30.89
    Won balls, offensive half3225
    Pressing intensity0.240.23
    Pressing efficiency0.320.48
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.330.52
    Entries into the box per match917
    Entries into the box against1210
    Pass completion %0.60.65
    Pass completion % under pressure0.640.59
    Passes per match212281
    Passes against per match376170
    Switches of play per match10.320.5
    Long balls per match2930
    Set piecesPlymouth ArgyleBarnsley
    xG from free kicks0.060.06
    Corners per match68.9
    Corners against per match5.23.4
    xG per corner0.020.01
    xGA per corner against0.020.03
    First touch, offensive corners %0.20.6
    First touch, defensive corners %0.50.59
    OtherPlymouth ArgyleBarnsley
    Throw-in control0.760.65
    The goalkeepersMurphy Joseph Mahoney Cooper (Plymouth Argyle)Rogan Ravenhill (Barnsley)
    Saves88
    Save %50%50%
    xG prevented28%24%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Plymouth Argyle vs Barnsley according to our model?

    The model gives Plymouth Argyle a 44% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Plymouth Argyle 44%, draw 28%, Barnsley 28%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 49% and under at 51%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 54% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.