01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Stevenage or draw (1X)70%
- Under 3.5 goals82%
EFL League OneLamex Stadium, Stevenage17°4,3 mm21 km/h
Läs på svenskaOscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work
TEXT:
A small head-to-head sample shows both meetings since 2023 ended in draws, indicating no clear historical edge for either side. However, current model probabilities favor the hosts with a 41% chance of winning, while Rovers sit at a 26% probability. Despite this tilt towards Stevenage, the most likely scoreline remains a 1-1 draw at 14%, closely followed by a 1-0 win for the home side at 13%.
While Stevenage's style of possession control might seem advantageous, especially on home turf, the expected goals (xG) tell a different story. Doncaster Rovers have a higher xG per match at 0.92 compared to Stevenage's 0.69, suggesting they might be more effective in creating genuine scoring opportunities. Additionally, the visitors excel in xG within eight seconds of winning the ball, a testament to their prowess on the counter-attack, an area where the hosts lag significantly.
Rain is expected at 5.1 mm, which could suppress goal-scoring opportunities, a factor already considered in the model's numbers. With expected goals standing at 1.19 for Stevenage and 1.00 for Doncaster, it's reasonable to anticipate a low-scoring affair. The model indicates a 38% chance for over 2.5 goals, while both teams to score sits at 44%, reinforcing the likelihood of few goals being scored.
The under 1.5 goals market appears to be where the value lies, with odds of 3.05 offered by Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet, presenting a 7% edge over the model's 35% rating. This presents an intriguing option for bettors seeking value in a match that might end goalless or with a solitary strike. Given these insights, a tight, low-scoring match seems the likeliest outcome, with the under 1.5 angle the sharpest play.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Stevenage | X | 2 · Doncaster Rovers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 2.25 | EV+ 2% 3.10 | 2.95 |
| Betsson | 2.25 | EV+ 2% 3.10 | 2.95 |
| Nordicbet | 2.25 | EV+ 2% 3.10 | 2.95 |
| Pinnacle | 2.36 | EV+ 8% 3.28 | 3.19 |
Odds updated 29 Aug, 07:37
2.23 → 2.36
3.28 → 3.28
3.28 → 3.19
2.12 → 2.17
Pinnacle · 8 recorded price levels · 23/08/2026 → 29/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on League One data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Stevenage | Doncaster Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 1 | 1 |
| xPoints | 1.8 | 3.2 |
| xG per match | 0.69 | 0.92 |
| xGA per match | 1.1 | 0.95 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.01 | 0.06 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.08 | 0.26 |
| Playing style | Stevenage | Doncaster Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.31 | 0.33 |
| Field tilt | 0.49 | 0.3 |
| xT per match | 0.85 | 0.78 |
| xTA per match | 0.69 | 1.3 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 27 | 21 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.26 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.44 | 0.35 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.44 | 0.28 |
| Entries into the box per match | 14 | 7 |
| Entries into the box against | 6 | 25 |
| Pass completion % | 0.62 | 0.64 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.65 | 0.6 |
| Passes per match | 234 | 249 |
| Passes against per match | 272 | 346 |
| Switches of play per match | 22.1 | 16.6 |
| Long balls per match | 40 | 30 |
| Set pieces | Stevenage | Doncaster Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.08 | 0 |
| Corners per match | 3 | 2.6 |
| Corners against per match | 3.9 | 5.7 |
| xG per corner | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| xGA per corner against | 0 | 0.01 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.5 | 0.4 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.75 | 0.73 |
| Other | Stevenage | Doncaster Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.77 | 0.69 |
| The goalkeepers | Filip Marschall (Stevenage) | Tommy James Simkin (Doncaster Rovers) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 4 | 3 |
| Save % | 57% | 60% |
| xG prevented | 17% | 56% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Stevenage a 41% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Stevenage 41%, draw 33%, Doncaster Rovers 26%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 14% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 38% and under at 62%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 44% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.