Europa League11°5 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    CeljeCeljeCounter-attacks & crosses
    vs
    Omonia NicosiaOmonia NicosiaBalanced & physical
    The model's lean: 1 · Celje (46%)

    Celje vs Omonia Nicosia · Europa League

    1 · Celje 46%X 25%29% Omonia Nicosia · 2

    Bet on this match

    NordicbetVälkommen in i matchen! Skapa ett konto, gör en insättning och hämta ett gratisspel värt 100 kr plus 50 freespins på Pirots 4.Claim the bonus at Nordicbet
    BetsafeHämta ett 100 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4 när du gör din första insättning hos Betsafe!Claim the bonus at Betsafe
    LeoVegas100 % upp till 600 kr på sport vid första insättningenClaim the bonus at LeoVegas

    18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links

    Analysis: Celje – Omonia Nicosia

    Anna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work

    A 46% chance for Celje to win might seem like a statistical toss-up, but the model's lean toward the home side sets the stage for a fascinating clash against Omonia Nicosia. The numbers suggest a closely contested battle, with the most likely outcome being a 1-1 draw at 12%. Yet, the underlying metrics paint a picture that defies Celje's winless streak. LeoVegas offers Celje at odds of 2.3, presenting a 5% edge over the market — a value bet for those inclined to trust the model's insight.

    Despite Omonia Nicosia’s clear advantage in points and xPoints, Celje’s expected goals of 1.61 indicate they should be able to carve out opportunities. Their style, reliant on counter attacks and crossing, might find joy against the visitors' physical approach. On paper, Omonia has the edge in expected goals per match and defensive solidity, but this hasn't translated into overwhelming dominance.

    Celje's defensive numbers are worrying, conceding 1.7 xGA per match, yet Omonia Nicosia isn't significantly tighter at the back with 1.6 xGA. This parity in vulnerability suggests both teams are likely to find the net, as reflected in the 57% probability of both teams scoring. The slight lean toward over 2.5 goals at 54% further supports the idea of a more open contest than the table might suggest.

    It's a classic battle of styles, with Celje's counter-attacking flair against Omonia's balanced robustness. The small sample size of head-to-head encounters means the current form and expected metrics take precedence. With the model backing a home win, the numbers encourage confidence in Celje’s ability to finally register points.

    For bettors seeking value, backing Celje at 2.3 with LeoVegas is the sharpest angle. The data-driven model sees a tighter game than the standings imply, and with a 5% edge, this might be the night Celje defies their xG underperformance.

    CeljeCelje
    Form L
    League ranking xG #50xGA #37xT #46xP/match #52Points #36
    Key players
    • Milot AvdyliLBxG 0.04 · xT 0.24
    • Artemijus TutyškinasCBxG 0.00 · xT 0.11
    • Mark ZabukovnikCDMxG 0.00 · xT 0.09
    • Numbers from UEFA Champions League 2026
    Omonia NicosiaOmonia Nicosia
    Form LWW
    League ranking xG #32xGA #36xT #31xP/match #27Points #7
    Key players
    • Ewandro Felipe de Lima CostaRWxG 0.09 · xT 0.16
    • Loïs DionyFxG 0.57 · xT 0.02
    • Panagiotis AndreouCMxG 0.12 · xT 0.05

    Match prediction: Celje – Omonia Nicosia

    Predicted score matrix

    Omonia Nicosia →
    Celje →
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–06.1%
    0–16.8%
    0–24.5%
    0–31.9%
    0–4+0.8%
    1
    1–08.9%
    1–111.9%
    1–27.2%
    1–33.0%
    1–4+1.2%
    2
    2–07.5%
    2–19.3%
    2–25.8%
    2–32.4%
    2–4+1.0%
    3
    3–04.0%
    3–15.0%
    3–23.1%
    3–31.3%
    3–4+0.5%
    4+
    4+–02.3%
    4+–12.9%
    4+–21.8%
    4+–30.7%
    4+–4+0.3%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-112%
    2. 2.2-19%
    3. 3.1-09%
    4. 4.2-07%
    5. 5.1-27%
    Expected goals
    1,61–1,24
    Both teams to score
    57%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,9
    Under 2,546%
    @1.99
    Over 2,554%
    @1.82

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own →

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Celje to win46%
    • Over 1.5 goals78%

    Combined probability

    37%

    Fair odds

    2.74

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Celje to win46%
    • Over 2.5 goals54%
    • Mario Kvesić to score26%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score57%
    • Over 2.5 goals54%
    • Mario Kvesić to score26%
    • Mateo Marić to be booked21%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 1 · Celje46% probability@2.48BetsafeEV+14%reference odds
    • 1 · Celje46% probability@2.48NordicbetEV+14%reference odds
    • 1 · Celje46% probability@2.35LeoVegasEV+8%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · CeljeX2 · Omonia Nicosia
    Betsafe
    EV+ 14%
    2.48
    3.402.82
    LeoVegas
    EV+ 8%
    2.35
    3.352.70
    Nordicbet
    EV+ 14%
    2.48
    3.402.82

    Odds updated 7 Oct, 18:37

    Odds movement

    1+2 %
    42 %37 %

    2.30 → 2.35

    X+2 %
    30 %25 %

    3.30 → 3.35

    2-2 %
    36 %31 %

    2.75 → 2.70

    Over 2,50 %
    55 %50 %

    1.73 → 1.73

    LeoVegas · 2 recorded price levels · 07/10/2026 → 07/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Omonia Nicosia
    When goals are scored and conceded — 2026
    Celje (0–2)
    Omonia Nicosia (5–3)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Celje
    Mark Zabukovnik: 61 passningar, xT 0.03ZabukovnikMilot Avdyli: 55 passningar, xT 0.09AvdyliArtemijus Tutyškinas: 47 passningar, xT 0.08TutyškinasŁukasz Bejger: 46 passningar, xT 0.04BejgerPijus Širvys: 46 passningar, xT 0.02ŠirvysSvit Sešlar: 45 passningar, xT -0.04SešlarLuka Vešner Tičić: 38 passningar, xT 0.01TičićŽan-Luk Leban: 28 passningar, xT 0.01LebanBenjamin Verbič: 16 passningar, xT 0.13VerbičPapa Mustapha Daniel: 11 passningar, xT 0.01DanielYaya Dukuly: 9 passningar, xT -0.01Dukuly
    Omonia Nicosia
    Senou Coulibaly: 160 passningar, xT 0.23CoulibalyMateo Marić: 152 passningar, xT 0.1MarićJure Balkovec: 137 passningar, xT 0.29BalkovecPanagiotis Andreou: 98 passningar, xT 0.09AndreouJean-Kévin Duverne: 92 passningar, xT 0.25DuverneNikolas Panagiotou: 92 passningar, xT 0.14PanagiotouEwandro Felipe de Lima Costa: 77 passningar, xT 0.49CostaMuamer Tanković: 70 passningar, xT 0.13TankovićĽubomír Šatka: 54 passningar, xT 0.02ŠatkaJaden Sean Montnor: 53 passningar, xT 0.48MontnorFabiano Ribeiro de Freitas: 51 passningar, xT 0.03Freitas
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Celje
    Mark Zabukovnik: 61 passningar, xT 0.03ZabukovnikMilot Avdyli: 55 passningar, xT 0.09AvdyliArtemijus Tutyškinas: 47 passningar, xT 0.08TutyškinasŁukasz Bejger: 46 passningar, xT 0.04BejgerPijus Širvys: 46 passningar, xT 0.02ŠirvysSvit Sešlar: 45 passningar, xT -0.04SešlarLuka Vešner Tičić: 38 passningar, xT 0.01TičićŽan-Luk Leban: 28 passningar, xT 0.01LebanBenjamin Verbič: 16 passningar, xT 0.13VerbičPapa Mustapha Daniel: 11 passningar, xT 0.01DanielYaya Dukuly: 9 passningar, xT -0.01Dukuly
    Omonia Nicosia
    Senou Coulibaly: 160 passningar, xT 0.23CoulibalyMateo Marić: 152 passningar, xT 0.1MarićJure Balkovec: 137 passningar, xT 0.29BalkovecPanagiotis Andreou: 98 passningar, xT 0.09AndreouJean-Kévin Duverne: 92 passningar, xT 0.25DuverneNikolas Panagiotou: 92 passningar, xT 0.14PanagiotouEwandro Felipe de Lima Costa: 77 passningar, xT 0.49CostaMuamer Tanković: 70 passningar, xT 0.13TankovićĽubomír Šatka: 54 passningar, xT 0.02ŠatkaJaden Sean Montnor: 53 passningar, xT 0.48MontnorFabiano Ribeiro de Freitas: 51 passningar, xT 0.03Freitas

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceCeljeOmonia Nicosia
    Points06
    xPoints0.73.7
    xG per match0.621.2
    xGA per match1.71.6
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.090.44
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball00.17
    Playing styleCeljeOmonia Nicosia
    Build-up efficiency0.320.31
    Field tilt0.260.34
    xT per match0.660.94
    xTA per match1.11.1
    Won balls, offensive half1719
    Pressing intensity0.240.23
    Pressing efficiency0.210.24
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.110.18
    Entries into the box per match410
    Entries into the box against2115
    Pass completion %0.820.79
    Pass completion % under pressure0.780.76
    Passes per match431363
    Passes against per match571451
    Switches of play per match46.627
    Long balls per match3930
    Set piecesCeljeOmonia Nicosia
    xG from free kicks00.02
    Corners per match23
    Corners against per match6.17.3
    xG per corner00.07
    xGA per corner against0.010.01
    First touch, offensive corners %00.33
    First touch, defensive corners %0.50.64
    OtherCeljeOmonia Nicosia
    Throw-in control0.670.7
    The goalkeepersŽan-Luk Leban (Celje)Fabiano Ribeiro de Freitas (Omonia Nicosia)
    Saves710
    Save %88%77%
    xG prevented90%28%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Celje vs Omonia Nicosia according to our model?

    The model gives Celje a 46% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Celje 46%, draw 25%, Omonia Nicosia 29%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 54% and under at 46%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 57% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.