01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Arminia Bielefeld to win48%
- Over 1.5 goals77%
2. BundesligaSchücoArena, Bielefeld17°20 km/h
Läs på svenskaAnna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work
In a rare head-to-head matchup, Arminia Bielefeld and Heidenheim find themselves at a crossroads where historical data takes a back seat to current form and underlying metrics. With only a small sample to draw from, the focus shifts to what's happening on the pitch this season. Bielefeld, with a 48% likelihood of winning according to model probabilities, are deemed clear favorites, yet it's the visitors who enter with a streak of three consecutive victories, pointing to a clash between numbers and momentum.
Heidenheim's recent run of form is compelling, bolstered by superior points (12 vs. 4) and a slight edge in xPoints (7.6 vs. 6.4). This suggests a team that's capitalizing on its opportunities better than the hosts. Additionally, their higher xG per match (1.6 vs. 1.3) and ability to generate xG within 8 seconds of winning the ball (0.36 vs. 0.28) paint Heidenheim as a team capable of turning possession into chances more effectively than Bielefeld. However, the Bielefeld model's expectations point to a tight game, favoring a 1-1 or 1-0 scoreline.
The expected goals tilt slightly in Bielefeld's favor (1.65 vs. 1.13), pointing to a match where the hosts might edge proceedings. Despite Heidenheim's recent form, the model and the expected goals suggest a narrow victory for Bielefeld. Yet, with a 53% chance of over 2.5 goals and 55% likelihood of both teams scoring, the attacking intent from both sides cannot be ignored.
The betting value, however, lies in the under 2.5 goals market. With odds of 2.3 available at Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet, and a calculated model value of 47%, there's a notable 9% edge. This assessment indicates potential value for bettors, suggesting a more cautious, defense-oriented affair than the bare form might imply.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Arminia Bielefeld | X | 2 · Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betfair Exchange | EV+ 0% 2.08 | EV+ 7% 3.90 | 2.76 |
| Betsafe | EV+ 3% 2.15 | 3.45 | 2.95 |
| Betsson | EV+ 3% 2.15 | 3.45 | 2.95 |
| Nordicbet | EV+ 3% 2.15 | 3.45 | 2.95 |
| Pinnacle | EV+ 7% 2.22 | EV+ 2% 3.73 | 3.12 |
Odds updated 19 Sept, 16:36
Market signal
The market has moved clearly towards an Heidenheim win since 14 September — the odds have shortened from 3.60 to 3.12 (−13%).
1.96 → 2.22
3.80 → 3.73
3.60 → 3.12
Pinnacle · 8 recorded price levels · 14/09/2026 → 19/09/2026 · fixed scale 10 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Arminia Bielefeld | Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 4 | 12 |
| xPoints | 6.4 | 7.6 |
| xG per match | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| xGA per match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.28 | 0.36 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.32 | 0.2 |
| Playing style | Arminia Bielefeld | Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.33 | 0.32 |
| Field tilt | 0.42 | 0.38 |
| xT per match | 0.91 | 1 |
| xTA per match | 0.77 | 0.83 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 28 | 23 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.27 | 0.31 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.21 | 0.28 |
| Entries into the box per match | 14 | 14 |
| Entries into the box against | 13 | 14 |
| Pass completion % | 0.74 | 0.71 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.67 | 0.66 |
| Passes per match | 333 | 278 |
| Passes against per match | 403 | 361 |
| Switches of play per match | 36.6 | 32.6 |
| Long balls per match | 40 | 43 |
| Set pieces | Arminia Bielefeld | Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| Corners per match | 6.4 | 4.2 |
| Corners against per match | 5.6 | 7 |
| xG per corner | 0.02 | 0.06 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.5 | 0.38 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.48 | 0.54 |
| Other | Arminia Bielefeld | Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.78 | 0.7 |
| The goalkeepers | Jonas Kersken (Arminia Bielefeld) | Thomas Dähne (Heidenheim) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 14 | 12 |
| Save % | 64% | 80% |
| xG prevented | 36% | 64% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Arminia Bielefeld a 48% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Arminia Bielefeld 48%, draw 27%, Heidenheim 24%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 53% and under at 47%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 55% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.