2. BundesligaSchücoArena, Bielefeld17°20 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Arminia BielefeldArminia BielefeldPossession control
    vs
    HeidenheimHeidenheimPossession control
    The model's lean: 1 · Arminia Bielefeld (48%)Best value by the model: Under 2,5 @ 2.30 (+9 %)

    Arminia Bielefeld vs Heidenheim · 2. Bundesliga

    1 · Arminia Bielefeld 48%X 27%24% Heidenheim · 2

    Analysis: Arminia BielefeldHeidenheim

    Anna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work

    In a rare head-to-head matchup, Arminia Bielefeld and Heidenheim find themselves at a crossroads where historical data takes a back seat to current form and underlying metrics. With only a small sample to draw from, the focus shifts to what's happening on the pitch this season. Bielefeld, with a 48% likelihood of winning according to model probabilities, are deemed clear favorites, yet it's the visitors who enter with a streak of three consecutive victories, pointing to a clash between numbers and momentum.

    Heidenheim's recent run of form is compelling, bolstered by superior points (12 vs. 4) and a slight edge in xPoints (7.6 vs. 6.4). This suggests a team that's capitalizing on its opportunities better than the hosts. Additionally, their higher xG per match (1.6 vs. 1.3) and ability to generate xG within 8 seconds of winning the ball (0.36 vs. 0.28) paint Heidenheim as a team capable of turning possession into chances more effectively than Bielefeld. However, the Bielefeld model's expectations point to a tight game, favoring a 1-1 or 1-0 scoreline.

    The expected goals tilt slightly in Bielefeld's favor (1.65 vs. 1.13), pointing to a match where the hosts might edge proceedings. Despite Heidenheim's recent form, the model and the expected goals suggest a narrow victory for Bielefeld. Yet, with a 53% chance of over 2.5 goals and 55% likelihood of both teams scoring, the attacking intent from both sides cannot be ignored.

    The betting value, however, lies in the under 2.5 goals market. With odds of 2.3 available at Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet, and a calculated model value of 47%, there's a notable 9% edge. This assessment indicates potential value for bettors, suggesting a more cautious, defense-oriented affair than the bare form might imply.

    Arminia BielefeldArminia Bielefeld
    Form LWLDL
    League ranking xG #15xGA #7xT #12xP/match #14Points #14
    Key players
    • Joel GrodowskiFxG 0.46 · xT 0.08
    • Marius WörlLWxG 0.20 · xT 0.05
    • Marvin MehlemFxG 0.09 · xT 0.02
    HeidenheimHeidenheim
    Form WLWWW
    League ranking xG #8xGA #6xT #7xP/match #3Points #3
    Key players
    • Marvin PieringerFxG 0.22 · xT -0.04
    • Budu ZivzivadzeFxG 0.15 · xT 0.00
    • Marcel CostlyFxG 0.27 · xT 0.14

    Match prediction: Arminia BielefeldHeidenheim

    Predicted score matrix

    Heidenheim
    Arminia Bielefeld
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–06.5%
    0–16.6%
    0–24.0%
    0–31.5%
    0–4+0.5%
    1
    1–09.8%
    1–111.9%
    1–26.5%
    1–32.5%
    1–4+0.9%
    2
    2–08.4%
    2–19.5%
    2–25.4%
    2–32.0%
    2–4+0.7%
    3
    3–04.6%
    3–15.3%
    3–23.0%
    3–31.1%
    3–4+0.4%
    4+
    4+–02.8%
    4+–13.2%
    4+–21.8%
    4+–30.7%
    4+–4+0.2%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-112%
    2. 2.1-010%
    3. 3.2-110%
    4. 4.2-08%
    5. 5.0-17%
    Expected goals
    1,651,13
    Both teams to score
    55%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,8
    Under 2,547%
    @2.30EV+9%
    Over 2,553%
    @1.55

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Arminia Bielefeld to win48%
    • Over 1.5 goals77%

    Combined probability

    39%

    Fair odds

    2.55

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Arminia Bielefeld to win48%
    • Over 2.5 goals53%
    • Joel Grodowski to score20%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score55%
    • Over 2.5 goals53%
    • Joel Grodowski to score20%
    • Stefano Russo to be booked24%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • Under 2.547% probability@2.30BetsafeEV+9%reference odds
    • Under 2.547% probability@2.30BetssonEV+9%reference odds
    • Under 2.547% probability@2.30NordicbetEV+9%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · Arminia BielefeldX2 · Heidenheim
    Betfair Exchange
    EV+ 0%
    2.08
    EV+ 7%
    3.90
    2.76
    Betsafe
    EV+ 3%
    2.15
    3.452.95
    Betsson
    EV+ 3%
    2.15
    3.452.95
    Nordicbet
    EV+ 3%
    2.15
    3.452.95
    Pinnacle
    EV+ 7%
    2.22
    EV+ 2%
    3.73
    3.12

    Odds updated 19 Sept, 16:36

    Odds movement

    Market signal

    The market has moved clearly towards an Heidenheim win since 14 September — the odds have shortened from 3.60 to 3.12 (−13%).

    1+13 %
    51 %41 %

    1.962.22

    X-2 %
    30 %20 %

    3.803.73

    2-13 %
    34 %24 %

    3.603.12

    Pinnacle · 8 recorded price levels · 14/09/2026 → 19/09/2026 · fixed scale 10 percentage points

    Statistics

    Key facts

    • Heidenheim come into this round on 3 straight wins.
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Arminia Bielefeld
    Heidenheim
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Arminia Bielefeld (810)
    Heidenheim (1210)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Arminia Bielefeld
    Maximilian Bauer: 231 passningar, xT 0.48BauerMaximilian Großer: 211 passningar, xT 0.08GroßerStefano Russo: 197 passningar, xT 0.1RussoHenri Koudossou: 162 passningar, xT 1.44KoudossouJonas Kersken: 151 passningar, xT 0.17KerskenMarius Wörl: 140 passningar, xT 0.09WörlArne Sicker: 134 passningar, xT 0.2SickerJannik Rochelt: 112 passningar, xT 0.57RocheltMarvin Mehlem: 61 passningar, xT -0.01MehlemJoel Grodowski: 56 passningar, xT 0.3GrodowskiTim Handwerker: 53 passningar, xT 0.32Handwerker
    Heidenheim
    Jonas Föhrenbach: 209 passningar, xT 0.77FöhrenbachPatrick Mainka: 163 passningar, xT 0.29MainkaJan Schöppner: 114 passningar, xT 0.05SchöppnerMarcel Costly: 97 passningar, xT 0.66CostlyThomas Dähne: 89 passningar, xT 0.07DähneTim Siersleben: 87 passningar, xT 0.44SierslebenMarnon Busch: 86 passningar, xT 0.24BuschMichael Heule: 78 passningar, xT 0.84HeuleOualid Mhamdi: 77 passningar, xT 0.64MhamdiAdrian Beck: 62 passningar, xT 0.1BeckFrank Feller: 52 passningar, xT 0.08Feller
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Arminia Bielefeld
    Maximilian Bauer: 231 passningar, xT 0.48BauerMaximilian Großer: 211 passningar, xT 0.08GroßerStefano Russo: 197 passningar, xT 0.1RussoHenri Koudossou: 162 passningar, xT 1.44KoudossouJonas Kersken: 151 passningar, xT 0.17KerskenMarius Wörl: 140 passningar, xT 0.09WörlArne Sicker: 134 passningar, xT 0.2SickerJannik Rochelt: 112 passningar, xT 0.57RocheltMarvin Mehlem: 61 passningar, xT -0.01MehlemJoel Grodowski: 56 passningar, xT 0.3GrodowskiTim Handwerker: 53 passningar, xT 0.32Handwerker
    Heidenheim
    Jonas Föhrenbach: 209 passningar, xT 0.77FöhrenbachPatrick Mainka: 163 passningar, xT 0.29MainkaJan Schöppner: 114 passningar, xT 0.05SchöppnerMarcel Costly: 97 passningar, xT 0.66CostlyThomas Dähne: 89 passningar, xT 0.07DähneTim Siersleben: 87 passningar, xT 0.44SierslebenMarnon Busch: 86 passningar, xT 0.24BuschMichael Heule: 78 passningar, xT 0.84HeuleOualid Mhamdi: 77 passningar, xT 0.64MhamdiAdrian Beck: 62 passningar, xT 0.1BeckFrank Feller: 52 passningar, xT 0.08Feller

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceArminia BielefeldHeidenheim
    Points412
    xPoints6.47.6
    xG per match1.31.6
    xGA per match1.41.4
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.280.36
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.320.2
    Playing styleArminia BielefeldHeidenheim
    Build-up efficiency0.330.32
    Field tilt0.420.38
    xT per match0.911
    xTA per match0.770.83
    Won balls, offensive half2823
    Pressing intensity0.230.23
    Pressing efficiency0.270.31
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.210.28
    Entries into the box per match1414
    Entries into the box against1314
    Pass completion %0.740.71
    Pass completion % under pressure0.670.66
    Passes per match333278
    Passes against per match403361
    Switches of play per match36.632.6
    Long balls per match4043
    Set piecesArminia BielefeldHeidenheim
    xG from free kicks0.060.06
    Corners per match6.44.2
    Corners against per match5.67
    xG per corner0.020.06
    xGA per corner against0.020.03
    First touch, offensive corners %0.50.38
    First touch, defensive corners %0.480.54
    OtherArminia BielefeldHeidenheim
    Throw-in control0.780.7
    The goalkeepersJonas Kersken (Arminia Bielefeld)Thomas Dähne (Heidenheim)
    Saves1412
    Save %64%80%
    xG prevented36%64%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Arminia Bielefeld vs Heidenheim according to our model?

    The model gives Arminia Bielefeld a 48% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Arminia Bielefeld 48%, draw 27%, Heidenheim 24%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 53% and under at 47%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 55% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.