01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Hannover 96 to win55%
- Over 1.5 goals80%
2. BundesligaHeinz-von-Heiden-Arena, Hannover18°0,4 mm25 km/h
Läs på svenskaMarcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work
A crucial stat dominates this matchup: Hannover 96 has a 55% probability of winning, yet they've failed to beat Bochum in their last two encounters since 2023. Despite this, the hosts are buoyed by their expected goals advantage, producing 1.9 xG per match compared to Bochum’s 1.6. Their high-pressing style could disrupt Bochum's possession control and create key scoring opportunities. However, their defensive vulnerabilities are evident, mirrored by an xGA of 1.9, in stark contrast to Bochum’s more stable 1.2 xGA.
The most likely scorelines suggest a tight contest, with a 1-1 draw leading at 11% probability. Hannover 96’s slight edge in expected goals could tilt the balance toward a 2-1 result at 9% likelihood. While their form suggests potential, it’s balanced by Bochum's actual points tally of 7, overshadowing Hannover’s 4. Despite the apparent high chance of both teams scoring (60%), the model sees under 2.5 goals happening 42% of the time, providing a significant value angle.
Undoubtedly, the sharpest betting edge lies in the under 2.5 goals market, available at 2.58 odds with Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet. With a 9% edge, it's an attractive proposition in a match where tactical nuances might reduce the goal count.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Hannover 96 | X | 2 · Bochum |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 1.80 | 3.85 | 3.65 |
| Betsson | 1.80 | 3.85 | 3.65 |
| Nordicbet | 1.80 | 3.85 | 3.65 |
| Pinnacle | 1.81 | 4.15 | 4.05 |
Odds updated 19 Sept, 16:36
1.82 → 1.81
4.02 → 4.15
3.94 → 4.05
Pinnacle · 11 recorded price levels · 13/09/2026 → 19/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on 2. Bundesliga data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Hannover 96 | Bochum |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 4 | 7 |
| xPoints | 6 | 7.6 |
| xG per match | 1.9 | 1.6 |
| xGA per match | 1.9 | 1.2 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.14 | 0.28 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.56 | 0.2 |
| Playing style | Hannover 96 | Bochum |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.32 | 0.32 |
| Field tilt | 0.64 | 0.52 |
| xT per match | 1.4 | 1 |
| xTA per match | 0.86 | 0.75 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 27 | 30 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.31 | 0.32 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.32 | 0.3 |
| Entries into the box per match | 22 | 11 |
| Entries into the box against | 12 | 12 |
| Pass completion % | 0.79 | 0.76 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.74 | 0.69 |
| Passes per match | 414 | 406 |
| Passes against per match | 326 | 347 |
| Switches of play per match | 26.3 | 26.4 |
| Long balls per match | 35 | 36 |
| Set pieces | Hannover 96 | Bochum |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.12 | 0.02 |
| Corners per match | 5.6 | 4.8 |
| Corners against per match | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.07 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.08 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.81 | 0.29 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.81 | 0.87 |
| Other | Hannover 96 | Bochum |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.78 | 0.71 |
| The goalkeepers | Leo Weinkauf (Hannover 96) | Timo Phil Horn (Bochum) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 20 | 13 |
| Save % | 80% | 77% |
| xG prevented | 62% | 77% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Hannover 96 a 55% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Hannover 96 55%, draw 21%, Bochum 24%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 58% and under at 42%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 60% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.