01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Energie Cottbus or draw (X2)73%
- Over 1.5 goals83%
2. BundesligaMerck-Stadion am Böllenfalltor, Darmstadt13°27,6 mm15 km/h
Läs på svenska18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Marcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work
The numbers favor the visitors. Cottbus holds a slight edge in points, boasting 8 to Darmstadt's 4, and this translates into a stronger xPoints tally as well. Their attacking prowess is evident with an average xG of 1.7 per match, nearly double that of Darmstadt's 0.9. However, defensively, Darmstadt might have the upper hand, conceding slightly less in terms of expected goals against (1.9 vs 2.2). The model's probabilities give Energie Cottbus a 40% chance to take all three points, with the most likely scoreline being a tight 1-1 draw.
Despite the wet conditions predicted to saturate the pitch, the model projects a 61% chance for over 2.5 goals, alongside a 62% likelihood of both teams finding the net. The rain, while dampening, is already factored into these figures, suggesting a lively encounter. A calculated 1-2 result seems plausible given the teams' xG profiles and defensive vulnerabilities.
From a betting perspective, the standout value lies with Cottbus at odds of 2.8 with LeoVegas, representing a 13% edge according to the model. Additionally, backing under 3.5 goals at 1.727 also holds a 6% edge, making it a sensible choice for those looking to mitigate risk. The odds suggest that while Cottbus is the lean, there's room to maneuver under a relatively conservative goal ceiling.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Darmstadt | X | 2 · Energie Cottbus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 2.12 | 3.70 | EV+ 15% 2.85 |
| LeoVegas | 2.10 | 3.80 | EV+ 15% 2.85 |
| Nordicbet | 2.12 | 3.70 | EV+ 15% 2.85 |
Odds updated 4 Oct, 13:36
2.08 → 2.10
3.80 → 3.80
2.80 → 2.85
LeoVegas · 3 recorded price levels · 02/10/2026 → 04/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Darmstadt | Energie Cottbus |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 4 | 8 |
| xPoints | 6.4 | 6.9 |
| xG per match | 0.9 | 1.7 |
| xGA per match | 1.9 | 2.2 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.2 | 0.13 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.42 | 0.35 |
| Playing style | Darmstadt | Energie Cottbus |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.32 | 0.33 |
| Field tilt | 0.3 | 0.62 |
| xT per match | 0.61 | 0.92 |
| xTA per match | 1.6 | 1.1 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 27 | 23 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.26 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.24 | 0.31 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.15 | 0.26 |
| Entries into the box per match | 9 | 14 |
| Entries into the box against | 23 | 14 |
| Pass completion % | 0.74 | 0.78 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.72 | 0.71 |
| Passes per match | 304 | 384 |
| Passes against per match | 485 | 312 |
| Switches of play per match | 19.3 | 28.8 |
| Long balls per match | 26 | 32 |
| Set pieces | Darmstadt | Energie Cottbus |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.06 | 0.08 |
| Corners per match | 4.5 | 7.9 |
| Corners against per match | 7.9 | 5.2 |
| xG per corner | 0.04 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.52 | 0.53 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.52 | 0.52 |
| Other | Darmstadt | Energie Cottbus |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.71 | 0.73 |
| The goalkeepers | Marcel Schuhen (Darmstadt) | Marcel Lotka (Energie Cottbus) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 23 | 24 |
| Save % | 64% | 67% |
| xG prevented | 39% | 40% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Energie Cottbus a 40% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Darmstadt 34%, draw 25%, Energie Cottbus 40%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 61% and under at 39%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 62% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Hämta bonus
Se ComeOns villkor
Hämta bonus
Se Hajpers villkor
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.