BundesligaWeserstadion, Bremen14°3,9 mm22 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Werder BremenWerder BremenBalanced & physical
    vs
    AugsburgAugsburgCounter-attacks & crosses
    The model's lean: 2 · Augsburg (37%)Soft drawBest value by the model: Under 2,5 @ 2.56 (+13 %)

    Werder BremenAugsburg · Bundesliga

    1 · Werder Bremen 35%X 28%37% Augsburg · 2

    Analysis: Werder BremenAugsburg

    Marcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work

    TEXT: Werder Bremen's physical approach will be tested against Augsburg's counter-attacking prowess in a matchup where the visitors have a slight statistical edge. Augsburg's ability to exploit open spaces with quick transitions and effective use of crosses makes them a formidable opponent for Bremen, who have struggled to dominate this head-to-head in recent encounters. Although the sample is only four matches since 2022, the lack of a win for Bremen in these clashes might weigh on their confidence.

    Augsburg's knack for efficient counter-attacking is evident in their superior xG per match of 2.9 compared to Bremen's 0.74. This suggests Augsburg not only create more chances but that their chances are of higher quality. Meanwhile, Bremen's balanced yet physical playstyle may struggle to contain Augsburg’s swift counter-attacks, especially given their xGA of 1.7 per match, which indicates potential vulnerabilities in their defense.

    The model places the visitors at a slight advantage, with a 37% probability of taking the victory compared to Bremen's 35%. This is further backed by Augsburg's 6 points garnered this season, compared to Bremen's 3, along with a superior xPoints tally (4.3 to 2.6). Such figures indicate that Augsburg may have the upper hand in this contest, particularly if they can dictate the pace and catch Bremen off guard.

    With a 56% likelihood of seeing over 2.5 goals, and a 59% chance for both teams to get on the scoresheet, fans might expect a lively contest. The most probable scorelines of 1-1 and 1-2 reflect a tight match, but one where Augsburg's slight edge could turn the tide.

    Given Augsburg's effective style against Bremen's weaknesses, this represents a potentially profitable angle in what could be a closely contested match.

    Werder BremenWerder Bremen
    Form LLLLW
    League ranking xG #16xGA #10xT #18xP/match #10Points #9
    Key players
    • Marco GrüllFxG 0.20 · xT 0.06
    • Olivier DemanLBxG 0.03 · xT 0.08
    • Iván San José CantalejoFxG 0.07 · xT 0.10
    AugsburgAugsburg
    Form WWLWW
    League ranking xG #1xGA #9xT #3xP/match #1Points #1
    Key players
    • Michael GregoritschFxG 0.71 · xT 0.00
    • Fabian RiederCMxG 0.10 · xT 0.13
    • Marius WolfRWxG 0.18 · xT 0.72

    Match prediction: Werder BremenAugsburg

    Predicted score matrix

    Augsburg
    Werder Bremen
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–05.8%
    0–18.1%
    0–26.5%
    0–33.4%
    0–4+1.8%
    1
    1–07.1%
    1–111.8%
    1–28.9%
    1–34.6%
    1–4+2.5%
    2
    2–05.0%
    2–17.8%
    2–26.1%
    2–33.1%
    2–4+1.7%
    3
    3–02.3%
    3–13.6%
    3–22.8%
    3–31.4%
    3–4+0.8%
    4+
    4+–01.1%
    4+–11.6%
    4+–21.3%
    4+–30.7%
    4+–4+0.4%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-112%
    2. 2.1-29%
    3. 3.0-18%
    4. 4.2-18%
    5. 5.1-07%
    Expected goals
    1,361,55
    Both teams to score
    59%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,9
    Under 2,544%
    @2.56EV+13%
    Over 2,556%
    @1.52

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Augsburg or draw (X2)67%
    • Over 1.5 goals79%

    Combined probability

    53%

    Fair odds

    1.89

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Augsburg or draw (X2)67%
    • Over 2.5 goals56%
    • Kristijan Jakić to score19%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score59%
    • Over 2.5 goals56%
    • Marco Grüll to score20%
    • Han-Noah Massengo to be booked19%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • Under 2.544% probability@2.56BetsafeEV+13%reference odds
    • Under 2.544% probability@2.56BetssonEV+13%reference odds
    • Under 2.544% probability@2.56NordicbetEV+13%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · Werder BremenX2 · Augsburg
    Betsafe2.40
    EV+ 2%
    3.60
    2.68
    Betsson2.40
    EV+ 2%
    3.60
    2.70
    Nordicbet2.40
    EV+ 2%
    3.60
    2.68
    Pinnacle2.29
    EV+ 11%
    3.91
    EV+ 1%
    2.76

    Odds updated 11 Sept, 05:38

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    4 matches
    Werder Bremen 0Draw 2Augsburg 2
    Goals: 37 (⌀ 2,5)

    Head-to-head based on Bundesliga data since 2022.

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Werder Bremen
    Augsburg
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Werder Bremen (45)
    Augsburg (71)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Werder Bremen
    Marco Friedl: 88 passningar, xT 0.08FriedlAmos Pieper: 83 passningar, xT 0.14PieperOlivier Deman: 68 passningar, xT 0.15DemanKarl Hein: 53 passningar, xT 0.01HeinLudovit Reis: 46 passningar, xT -0.01ReisMarco Grüll: 36 passningar, xT 0.07GrüllMick Schmetgens: 35 passningar, xT 0.05SchmetgensIván San José Cantalejo: 33 passningar, xT 0.17CantalejoArthur Augusto de Matos Soares: 26 passningar, xT 0.08SoaresNiclas Füllkrug: 23 passningar, xT -0.03FüllkrugYouri Pieter Regeer: 22 passningar, xT -0.09Regeer
    Augsburg
    Noahkai Banks: 73 passningar, xT 0.2BanksChrislain Matsima: 70 passningar, xT 0.02MatsimaHennes Behrens: 67 passningar, xT 0.18BehrensCalvin Marc Brackelmann: 65 passningar, xT 0.16BrackelmannFinn Dahmen: 65 passningar, xT 0DahmenFabian Rieder: 58 passningar, xT 0.22RiederHan-Noah Massengo: 53 passningar, xT 0.12MassengoMarius Wolf: 44 passningar, xT 1.18WolfRobin Fellhauer: 25 passningar, xT -0.01FellhauerMichael Gregoritsch: 25 passningar, xT -0.01GregoritschAnton Kade: 18 passningar, xT 0.74Kade
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Werder Bremen
    Marco Friedl: 88 passningar, xT 0.08FriedlAmos Pieper: 83 passningar, xT 0.14PieperOlivier Deman: 68 passningar, xT 0.15DemanKarl Hein: 53 passningar, xT 0.01HeinLudovit Reis: 46 passningar, xT -0.01ReisMarco Grüll: 36 passningar, xT 0.07GrüllMick Schmetgens: 35 passningar, xT 0.05SchmetgensIván San José Cantalejo: 33 passningar, xT 0.17CantalejoArthur Augusto de Matos Soares: 26 passningar, xT 0.08SoaresNiclas Füllkrug: 23 passningar, xT -0.03FüllkrugYouri Pieter Regeer: 22 passningar, xT -0.09Regeer
    Augsburg
    Noahkai Banks: 73 passningar, xT 0.2BanksChrislain Matsima: 70 passningar, xT 0.02MatsimaHennes Behrens: 67 passningar, xT 0.18BehrensCalvin Marc Brackelmann: 65 passningar, xT 0.16BrackelmannFinn Dahmen: 65 passningar, xT 0DahmenFabian Rieder: 58 passningar, xT 0.22RiederHan-Noah Massengo: 53 passningar, xT 0.12MassengoMarius Wolf: 44 passningar, xT 1.18WolfRobin Fellhauer: 25 passningar, xT -0.01FellhauerMichael Gregoritsch: 25 passningar, xT -0.01GregoritschAnton Kade: 18 passningar, xT 0.74Kade

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceWerder BremenAugsburg
    Points36
    xPoints2.64.3
    xG per match0.742.9
    xGA per match1.71.6
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.270.96
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.320.48
    Playing styleWerder BremenAugsburg
    Build-up efficiency0.30.32
    Field tilt0.260.43
    xT per match0.381.8
    xTA per match1.21.9
    Won balls, offensive half2525
    Pressing intensity0.230.23
    Pressing efficiency0.240.25
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.140.21
    Entries into the box per match617
    Entries into the box against1518
    Pass completion %0.750.72
    Pass completion % under pressure0.730.69
    Passes per match291311
    Passes against per match519429
    Switches of play per match25.319.4
    Long balls per match3226
    Set piecesWerder BremenAugsburg
    xG from free kicks0.050
    Corners per match3.57.6
    Corners against per match6.56.1
    xG per corner0.030.02
    xGA per corner against0.070.03
    First touch, offensive corners %0.430.53
    First touch, defensive corners %0.620.67
    OtherWerder BremenAugsburg
    Throw-in control0.770.62
    The goalkeepersKarl Hein (Werder Bremen)Finn Dahmen (Augsburg)
    Saves411
    Save %44%92%
    xG prevented17%87%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Werder Bremen vs Augsburg according to our model?

    The model gives Augsburg a 37% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Werder Bremen 35%, draw 28%, Augsburg 37%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 56% and under at 44%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 59% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.