01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Celtic to win61%
- Over 1.5 goals83%
Scottish PremiershipCeltic Park, Glasgow5°6 km/h
Läs på svenskaFinal score 7–1. Before kick-off the model's prediction was as follows. BetBuilders AI model prediction for Celtic vs Hearts (Scottish Premiership, Sunday, 18 October 2026): Celtic win 61%, draw 21%, Hearts win 19%. Expected goals (xG): Celtic 2.02, Hearts 1.19. Most likely score: 1-1 (10%). Over 2.5 goals 62%, both teams to score 61%. Double chance: Celtic or draw 81%, Hearts or draw 39%. Prediction updated Friday, 9 October 2026.
18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Marcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work
Celtic's high-press approach will likely be the decisive factor in their upcoming clash against Hearts. The hosts have a knack for converting turnovers into scoring opportunities, averaging an impressive 0.71 expected goals within eight seconds of winning the ball. This efficiency under pressure sets them apart from their opponents, whose numbers in the same metric lag significantly behind at 0.34. With the match expected to feature a lot of possession battles, Celtic’s ability to exploit quick transitions will be critical.
Despite Hearts' commendable ability to find the net in 16 consecutive league matches, their control-oriented style may struggle against a team that thrives on disrupting possession. While both teams are proficient in maintaining the ball, the home side's more dynamic and aggressive approach generally prevails in these contests. The model gives Celtic a 61% chance of victory, supported by their historical dominance in this matchup and their formidable home record. Winning 80% of their home matches is a testament to their fortress-like status, which Hearts will find challenging to breach.
The high-scoring nature of past encounters between these two is reflected in the 3.6 goals per meeting on average, aligning with the 62% probability of seeing more than 2.5 goals in this clash. While both teams to score is given a 61% likelihood, the visitors' defensive vulnerabilities could see them outmatched by Celtic's relentless pressure. The expected goals tally of 2.02 for the hosts compared to Hearts' 1.19 further underscores the attacking edge for the home side.
The most likely scorelines of 1-1 and 2-1 suggest a competitive match, yet the 2-0 outcome remains plausible should the hosts assert their dominance. Given the attacking stats and recent trends, a 2-1 victory for Celtic seems the most probable result. The statistical lean supports the over 2.5 goals market, providing a compelling angle for those looking to capitalize on what promises to be a lively encounter.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Celtic | X | 2 · Hearts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bet365 | 1.44 | 4.50 | EV+ 16% 6.25 |
| Betsafe | 1.55 | 4.30 | 4.90 |
| LeoVegas | 1.55 | 4.40 | 4.75 |
| Nordicbet | 1.55 | 4.30 | 4.90 |
| Pinnacle | 1.55 | EV+ 2% 4.88 | 5.16 |
Odds updated 18 Oct, 13:36
1.59 → 1.55
4.68 → 4.88
4.59 → 5.16
Pinnacle · 8 recorded price levels · 16/10/2026 → 18/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Scottish Premiership data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Celtic | Hearts |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 21 | 16 |
| xPoints | 14.7 | 14.2 |
| xG per match | 2.7 | 1.9 |
| xGA per match | 1 | 1 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.71 | 0.34 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.07 | 0.26 |
| Playing style | Celtic | Hearts |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.37 | 0.33 |
| Field tilt | 0.7 | 0.61 |
| xT per match | 1.8 | 1.2 |
| xTA per match | 0.65 | 0.71 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 29 | 27 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.21 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.28 | 0.32 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.22 | 0.27 |
| Entries into the box per match | 20 | 15 |
| Entries into the box against | 11 | 10 |
| Pass completion % | 0.83 | 0.75 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.78 | 0.67 |
| Passes per match | 557 | 368 |
| Passes against per match | 310 | 297 |
| Switches of play per match | 36.3 | 39.4 |
| Long balls per match | 32 | 42 |
| Set pieces | Celtic | Hearts |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0 | 0.05 |
| Corners per match | 9.4 | 7.3 |
| Corners against per match | 3.9 | 3.2 |
| xG per corner | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.55 | 0.45 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.55 | 0.77 |
| Other | Celtic | Hearts |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.81 | 0.77 |
| The goalkeepers | Viljami Sinisalo (Celtic) | Beau Reus (Hearts) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 24 | 10 |
| Save % | 89% | 59% |
| xG prevented | 68% | 29% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Celtic a 61% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Celtic 61%, draw 21%, Hearts 19%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 10% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 62% and under at 38%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 61% according to the model.
The model expects 2.02 goals (xG) for Celtic and 1.19 for Hearts, 3.21 in total.
Celtic or draw (1X) 81%, Hearts or draw (X2) 39% and no draw (12) 79%.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Hämta bonus
Se ComeOns villkor
Hämta bonus
Se Hajpers villkor
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.