01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Celta Vigo to win46%
- Over 1.5 goals78%
La LigaBalaídos, Vigo21°8 km/h
Läs på svenskaOscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work
FAKTA does not specify betting odds or which team the 2-1 scoreline favors, so these are unsupported additions. Corrected text:
Celta Vigo's home clash with Racing de Santander presents an intriguing imbalance. Despite the model's slight lean towards the hosts with a 46% win probability, the underlying metrics paint a different picture. Racing holds not only a better points tally, 4 to Celta's 3, but also a significant edge in expected points, suggesting their performances merit 6.3 points compared to Celta's 2.6. This discrepancy indicates that Racing might be undervalued by the market.
The expected goals figures tell a similar story, with Racing averaging 1.4 xG per match against Celta's paltry 0.57. Their defense, too, stands out, conceding just 1.1 xGA per match while Celta's vulnerable backline allows 1.6. These statistics suggest a tighter contest than odds might imply, supporting the notion that Racing's counter-attacking style could exploit Celta's deficiencies.
Given these insights, a 1-1 draw or a narrow 2-1 scoreline are plausible outcomes. The over 2.5 goals market, hovering at 54%, leans slightly towards an open match, yet the under shouldn't be dismissed given the tactical profiles.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Celta Vigo | X | 2 · Racing de Santander |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bet365 | 1.75 | 3.60 | EV+ 28% 4.33 |
| Betsafe | 1.78 | 3.85 | EV+ 26% 4.25 |
| Betsson | 1.78 | 3.85 | EV+ 26% 4.25 |
| Nordicbet | 1.78 | 3.85 | EV+ 26% 4.25 |
| Pinnacle | 1.78 | 4.03 | EV+ 19% 4.03 |
Odds updated 15 Sept, 06:36
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Celta Vigo | Racing de Santander |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 3 | 4 |
| xPoints | 2.6 | 6.3 |
| xG per match | 0.57 | 1.4 |
| xGA per match | 1.6 | 1.1 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.05 | 0.34 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.31 | 0.18 |
| Playing style | Celta Vigo | Racing de Santander |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.31 | 0.3 |
| Field tilt | 0.61 | 0.44 |
| xT per match | 0.59 | 1 |
| xTA per match | 0.68 | 1.2 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 23 | 21 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.22 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.23 | 0.25 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.21 | 0.21 |
| Entries into the box per match | 8 | 15 |
| Entries into the box against | 8 | 16 |
| Pass completion % | 0.83 | 0.76 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.78 | 0.69 |
| Passes per match | 512 | 336 |
| Passes against per match | 396 | 384 |
| Switches of play per match | 38.1 | 9 |
| Long balls per match | 35 | 19 |
| Set pieces | Celta Vigo | Racing de Santander |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.06 | 0.04 |
| Corners per match | 3.9 | 5.7 |
| Corners against per match | 5.1 | 9.2 |
| xG per corner | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.04 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.37 | 0.27 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.71 | 0.59 |
| Other | Celta Vigo | Racing de Santander |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.81 | 0.68 |
| The goalkeepers | Ionut Radu (Celta Vigo) | Julen Agirrezabala (Racing de Santander) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 15 | 18 |
| Save % | 75% | 69% |
| xG prevented | 53% | 47% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Celta Vigo a 46% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Celta Vigo 46%, draw 25%, Racing de Santander 30%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 54% and under at 46%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 57% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.