01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Rosengård to win48%
- Over 1.5 goals83%
Swedish Ettan14°1,5 mm15 km/h
Läs på svenska
RosengårdPossession & high press18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Anna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work
The text contains an unsupported claim: no betting odds (e.g., Bet365's 2.10) are provided in the FACTS.
CORRECTED TEXT:
Rosengård's high press and possession-based approach are likely to be the decisive factors as they head into their matchup against Ängelholm. With 35 points on the table compared to Ängelholm's 18, the visitors have carved out a clear edge this season. It's no wonder the model gives Rosengård a 48% chance of victory, a strong endorsement for their current form and tactical setup.
The expected goals (xG) metrics tell a similar story of Rosengård's superiority. They average 1.5 xG per match, while the hosts trail slightly with 1.2. Defensively, the gap is even more pronounced: Rosengård's xGA is a mere 1.0 compared to Ängelholm's 1.5. This contrast in defensive solidity could be crucial, especially given Ängelholm's tendency to rely on a more direct playing style. Their low defensive line might struggle to withstand the visitors' relentless attacking pressure.
Rosengård's ability to maintain possession and press high up the pitch might suffocate an Ängelholm side that prefers directness over intricate build-up play. The single head-to-head encounter this year, a win for Ängelholm, is too small a sample to overturn the season-long trends. Rosengård's overall consistency suggests that they are better positioned to adapt and exploit their opponents' weaknesses this time around.
The numbers lean towards a scoreline in Rosengård's favor, with 1-2 being a plausible outcome. The odds suggest an open game, given a 62% chance of over 2.5 goals and a 63% likelihood that both teams will score. However, the edge Rosengård holds in expected goals and points paints a picture of a match that might tilt towards the visitors, especially in crucial moments.
Given their superior xPoints, a high-pressing strategy tailored to outmaneuver Ängelholm's defense could see them emerge victorious, reinforcing the model's lean towards a Rosengård triumph.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
| Bookmaker | 1 · Ängelholm | X | 2 · Rosengård |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 3.10 | 3.50 | 2.00 |
| Betsson | 3.10 | 3.50 | 2.00 |
| Nordicbet | 3.10 | 3.50 | 2.00 |
Odds updated 28 Sept, 13:36
Head-to-head based on Ettan data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Ängelholm | Rosengård |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 18 | 35 |
| xPoints | 30.8 | 36.5 |
| xG per match | 1.2 | 1.5 |
| xGA per match | 1.5 | 1 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.19 | 0.36 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.23 | 0.18 |
| Playing style | Ängelholm | Rosengård |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.35 | 0.39 |
| Field tilt | 0.48 | 0.61 |
| xT per match | 1.3 | 1.5 |
| xTA per match | 1.5 | 1.2 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 29 | 33 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.48 | 0.5 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.27 | 0.28 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.26 | 0.28 |
| Entries into the box per match | 11 | 17 |
| Entries into the box against | 15 | 11 |
| Pass completion % | 0.76 | 0.79 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.71 | 0.74 |
| Passes per match | 324 | 388 |
| Passes against per match | 387 | 354 |
| Switches of play per match | 17.6 | 16.2 |
| Long balls per match | 30 | 30 |
| Set pieces | Ängelholm | Rosengård |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.14 | 0.22 |
| Corners per match | 4.3 | 6 |
| Corners against per match | 4.3 | 3.5 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.22 | 0.43 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.57 | 0.65 |
| Other | Ängelholm | Rosengård |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.51 | 0.55 |
| The goalkeepers | Robin Streifert (Ängelholm) | Alexander Cederfelt (Rosengård) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 66 | 56 |
| Save % | 64% | 71% |
| xG prevented | 38% | 72% |
| Claims | 157 (97%) | 105 (91%) |
The model gives Rosengård a 48% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Ängelholm 29%, draw 23%, Rosengård 48%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 62% and under at 38%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 63% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

250 kr gratisspel plus freespins
Hämta bonus
100 kr gratisspel plus freespins
Hämta bonus
100 kr gratisspel plus freespins
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.