Swedish Ettan14°15 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    TvååkerTvååkerCounter-attacks & crosses
    vs
    Hässleholms IFHässleholms IFLow block & direct
    The model's lean: 2 · Hässleholms IF (43%)

    Tvååker vs Hässleholms IF · Swedish Ettan

    1 · Tvååker 32%X 25%43% Hässleholms IF · 2

    Bet on this match

    BetssonFå ett 250 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4!Claim the bonus at Betsson
    NordicbetVälkommen in i matchen! Skapa ett konto, gör en insättning och hämta ett gratisspel värt 100 kr plus 50 freespins på Pirots 4.Claim the bonus at Nordicbet
    BetsafeHämta ett 100 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4 när du gör din första insättning hos Betsafe!Claim the bonus at Betsafe

    18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links

    Analysis: Tvååker – Hässleholms IF

    Marcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work

    The head-to-head record between Tvååker and Hässleholms IF might be thin on the ground, with just one match since 2023 where Hässleholm emerged victorious. However, it's the current form and statistical underpinnings that paint a clearer picture of the upcoming clash. Hässleholm's away approach, rooted in a low defensive block and direct play, has proven effective across the season. They’ve accumulated 42 points with an expected points tally of 39, both suggesting a level of efficiency above their hosts.

    Tvååker, on the other hand, thrives on counter-attacks and crossing play. While this strategy can be potent, their expected goals and actual goals are telling. Their xG per match sits at 1.1, which is slightly behind Hässleholm’s 1.4. Defensively, Tvååker leaks more, with an xGA of 1.6 compared to the visitors’ tighter 1.1. This suggests that while Tvååker can create, they are vulnerable at the back — a weakness Hässleholm will likely exploit with their direct offensive transitions.

    With these patterns in mind, the model suggests a competitive affair but leans towards Hässleholm with a 43% chance of victory against Tvååker’s 32%. The most likely scoreline is a 1-1 draw at 13%, but the visitors are favored for a narrow win, possibly 2-1 or 1-0. The over/under 2.5 goals market is finely poised at 51%, reflecting the potential for a closely contested match with goals expected from both sides at 55%.

    Given Hässleholm's edge in points, xPoints, and defensive solidity, backing a Hässleholm victory aligns with the model’s lean and the underlying metrics.

    TvååkerTvååker
    Form DWDLL
    League ranking xG #28xGA #24xT #15xP/match #22Points #16
    Key players
    • Melvin SjölandFxG 0.22 · xT 0.27
    • Mergim LaciFxG 0.47 · xT 0.07
    • Victor KarlssonLWxG 0.06 · xT 0.43
    Hässleholms IFHässleholms IF
    Form WWLWL
    League ranking xG #12xGA #6xT #18xP/match #2Points #5
    Key players
    • Albin AhlstrandFxG 0.19 · xT 0.09
    • Alex HallFxG 0.44 · xT 0.13
    • Linus BraunLWxG 0.13 · xT 0.52

    Match prediction: Tvååker – Hässleholms IF

    Predicted score matrix

    Hässleholms IF →
    Tvååker →
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–07.1%
    0–18.3%
    0–25.6%
    0–32.4%
    0–4+1.0%
    1
    1–09.1%
    1–112.6%
    1–27.9%
    1–33.4%
    1–4+1.4%
    2
    2–06.7%
    2–18.6%
    2–25.6%
    2–32.4%
    2–4+1.0%
    3
    3–03.1%
    3–14.0%
    3–22.6%
    3–31.1%
    3–4+0.5%
    4+
    4+–01.5%
    4+–11.9%
    4+–21.3%
    4+–30.5%
    4+–4+0.2%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-113%
    2. 2.1-09%
    3. 3.2-19%
    4. 4.0-18%
    5. 5.1-28%
    Expected goals
    1,41–1,29
    Both teams to score
    55%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,7
    Under 2,549%
    –
    Over 2,551%
    –

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own →

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Hässleholms IF or draw (X2)61%
    • Under 3.5 goals71%

    Combined probability

    44%

    Fair odds

    2.28

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Hässleholms IF or draw (X2)61%
    • Over 2.5 goals51%
    • Albin Ahlstrand to score27%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score55%
    • Over 2.5 goals51%
    • Albin Ahlstrand to score27%
    • Isak Wiman to be booked17%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    Bookmaker1 · TvååkerX2 · Hässleholms IF
    Betsafe2.723.552.20
    Betsson2.723.552.20
    Nordicbet2.723.552.20

    Odds updated 28 Sept, 13:36

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    1 matches
    Tvååker 0Draw 0Hässleholms IF 1
    Goals: 2–4 (⌀ 6)

    Head-to-head based on Ettan data since 2023.

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Tvååker
    Hässleholms IF
    When goals are scored and conceded — 2026
    Tvååker (30–33)
    Hässleholms IF (43–27)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Tvååker
    Theodor Graudums: 293 passningar, xT 0.32GraudumsGabriel Gustavsson: 284 passningar, xT 0.88GustavssonHugo Rödin: 230 passningar, xT 0.25RödinViggo Gustavsson: 200 passningar, xT 0.45GustavssonNoel Lundgren: 184 passningar, xT -0.06LundgrenIsak Wiman: 169 passningar, xT 0.26WimanMelvin Sjöland: 153 passningar, xT 2.29SjölandFelix Gustafsson: 84 passningar, xT 0.25GustafssonAlfred Ajdarevic: 82 passningar, xT 0.06AjdarevicAlexander Capocci Nielsen: 63 passningar, xT 0.21NielsenAlbin Malmlöf Johansson: 59 passningar, xT 0.01Johansson
    Hässleholms IF
    Anton Branting: 201 passningar, xT 0.32BrantingRami Jassim: 191 passningar, xT 0.45JassimJohan Persson Åhstedt: 173 passningar, xT 1.2ÅhstedtVilmer Persson Åhstedt: 133 passningar, xT 1.38ÅhstedtAdi Terzic: 132 passningar, xT 0.33TerzicAlbin Andersson: 99 passningar, xT 0.23AnderssonAlbin Ahlstrand: 98 passningar, xT 0.12AhlstrandPontus Carlsson: 93 passningar, xT 0.78CarlssonAlex Hall: 60 passningar, xT 0.22HallElton Ursprung: 45 passningar, xT 0.2UrsprungJussi Tikkanen: 39 passningar, xT -0.01Tikkanen
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Tvååker
    Theodor Graudums: 293 passningar, xT 0.32GraudumsGabriel Gustavsson: 284 passningar, xT 0.88GustavssonHugo Rödin: 230 passningar, xT 0.25RödinViggo Gustavsson: 200 passningar, xT 0.45GustavssonNoel Lundgren: 184 passningar, xT -0.06LundgrenIsak Wiman: 169 passningar, xT 0.26WimanMelvin Sjöland: 153 passningar, xT 2.29SjölandFelix Gustafsson: 84 passningar, xT 0.25GustafssonAlfred Ajdarevic: 82 passningar, xT 0.06AjdarevicAlexander Capocci Nielsen: 63 passningar, xT 0.21NielsenAlbin Malmlöf Johansson: 59 passningar, xT 0.01Johansson
    Hässleholms IF
    Anton Branting: 201 passningar, xT 0.32BrantingRami Jassim: 191 passningar, xT 0.45JassimJohan Persson Åhstedt: 173 passningar, xT 1.2ÅhstedtVilmer Persson Åhstedt: 133 passningar, xT 1.38ÅhstedtAdi Terzic: 132 passningar, xT 0.33TerzicAlbin Andersson: 99 passningar, xT 0.23AnderssonAlbin Ahlstrand: 98 passningar, xT 0.12AhlstrandPontus Carlsson: 93 passningar, xT 0.78CarlssonAlex Hall: 60 passningar, xT 0.22HallElton Ursprung: 45 passningar, xT 0.2UrsprungJussi Tikkanen: 39 passningar, xT -0.01Tikkanen

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceTvååkerHässleholms IF
    Points3342
    xPoints2939
    xG per match1.11.4
    xGA per match1.61.1
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.190.28
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.220.28
    Playing styleTvååkerHässleholms IF
    Build-up efficiency0.340.33
    Field tilt0.40.38
    xT per match1.41.4
    xTA per match1.61.6
    Won balls, offensive half2229
    Pressing intensity0.520.47
    Pressing efficiency0.260.29
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.270.3
    Entries into the box per match1110
    Entries into the box against1615
    Pass completion %0.780.73
    Pass completion % under pressure0.730.66
    Passes per match345265
    Passes against per match397385
    Switches of play per match18.115.1
    Long balls per match3024
    Set piecesTvååkerHässleholms IF
    xG from free kicks0.120.21
    Corners per match3.53.6
    Corners against per match6.86.2
    xG per corner0.040.03
    xGA per corner against0.040.02
    First touch, offensive corners %0.460.3
    First touch, defensive corners %0.60.61
    OtherTvååkerHässleholms IF
    Throw-in control0.570.48
    The goalkeepersAlexander Capocci Nielsen (Tvååker)Liam Bengtsson (Hässleholms IF)
    Saves9340
    Save %74%65%
    xG prevented63%45%
    Claims99 (88%)101 (96%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Tvååker vs Hässleholms IF according to our model?

    The model gives Hässleholms IF a 43% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Tvååker 32%, draw 25%, Hässleholms IF 43%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 51% and under at 49%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 55% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.