Swedish Ettan9°13 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    OlympicOlympicPossession & high press
    vs
    Hässleholms IFHässleholms IFLow block & direct
    The model's lean: 1 · Olympic (41%)Soft draw

    Olympic vs Hässleholms IF · Swedish Ettan

    1 · Olympic 41%X 24%36% Hässleholms IF · 2

    Prediction summary

    BetBuilders AI model prediction for Olympic vs Hässleholms IF (Swedish Ettan, Friday, 30 October 2026): Olympic win 41%, draw 24%, Hässleholms IF win 36%. Expected goals (xG): Olympic 1.71, Hässleholms IF 1.45. Most likely score: 1-1 (11%). Over 2.5 goals 61%, both teams to score 63%. Double chance: Olympic or draw 64%, Hässleholms IF or draw 59%. Prediction updated Friday, 23 October 2026.

    Bet on this match

    NordicbetVälkommen in i matchen! Skapa ett konto, gör en insättning och hämta ett gratisspel värt 100 kr plus 50 freespins på Pirots 4.Claim the bonus at Nordicbet
    BetsafeHämta ett 100 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4 när du gör din första insättning hos Betsafe!Claim the bonus at Betsafe
    LeoVegas100 % upp till 600 kr på sport vid första insättningenClaim the bonus at LeoVegas

    18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links

    Analysis: Olympic – Hässleholms IF

    Erik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work

    TEXT: Olympic's possession-heavy approach will face a stern test against Hässleholms IF's direct and defensively solid setup. Olympic's strategy often involves controlling the game through a high press, which aligns with their 1.71 expected goals per match. However, Hässleholms' disciplined low block and recent form could disrupt their rhythm. The visitors have been riding high on a three-match winning streak, suggesting they have the momentum to challenge Olympic at home.

    Despite Olympic's superior xG figures, Hässleholms have been more effective this season, with 51 points compared to Olympic's 36. Their ability to convert opportunities into points, combined with a lower xGA of 1.1, points to a tighter defense. Olympic's xGA of 1.5 indicates vulnerabilities, which Hässleholms will look to exploit with their direct play.

    The head-to-head record is evenly split with one win each and a draw. However, the sample size of three matches is too small to significantly influence predictions. The model leans slightly towards Olympic with a 41% win probability, suggesting a close encounter. The most likely scorelines are 1-1 and 2-1, highlighting the potential for a narrow victory for the hosts. There's a 61% likelihood of over 2.5 goals, and both teams have a 63% chance to score, suggesting that goals could come at both ends despite Hässleholms' defensive prowess.

    For bettors, the model's lean towards Olympic, despite the visitors' recent form, suggests a close contest worth monitoring. While not a guarantee, this represents a calculated angle based on current projections that might just pay off.

    OlympicOlympic
    Form DLLWW
    League ranking xG #2xGA #21xT #7xP/match #12Points #16
    Key players
    • Alexander RobértCAMxG 0.23 · xT 0.17
    • Albin SundgrenLWxG 0.08 · xT 0.33
    • Martins EgbeLBxG 0.03 · xT 0.23
    Hässleholms IFHässleholms IF
    Form LLWWW
    League ranking xG #15xGA #7xT #19xP/match #4Points #3
    Key players
    • Anton BrantingCBxG 0.07 · xT 0.08
    • Adi TerzicCBxG 0.08 · xT 0.08
    • Albin AnderssonCMxG 0.19 · xT 0.06

    Match prediction: Olympic – Hässleholms IF

    Predicted score matrix

    Hässleholms IF →
    Olympic →
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–04.5%
    0–15.8%
    0–24.5%
    0–32.2%
    0–4+1.1%
    1
    1–06.9%
    1–110.8%
    1–27.6%
    1–33.7%
    1–4+1.9%
    2
    2–06.2%
    2–19.0%
    2–26.5%
    2–33.2%
    2–4+1.6%
    3
    3–03.5%
    3–15.1%
    3–23.7%
    3–31.8%
    3–4+0.9%
    4+
    4+–02.2%
    4+–13.2%
    4+–22.3%
    4+–31.1%
    4+–4+0.6%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-111%
    2. 2.2-19%
    3. 3.1-28%
    4. 4.1-07%
    5. 5.2-27%
    Expected goals
    1,71–1,45
    Both teams to score
    63%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 3,2
    Under 2,539%
    –
    Over 2,561%
    –

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own →

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Olympic or draw (1X)68%
    • Over 1.5 goals83%

    Combined probability

    56%

    Fair odds

    1.78

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Olympic or draw (1X)68%
    • Over 2.5 goals61%
    • Osama Khattab to score24%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score63%
    • Over 2.5 goals61%
    • Osama Khattab to score24%
    • August Karlin to be booked19%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    No odds available yet.

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    3 matches
    Olympic 1Draw 1Hässleholms IF 1
    Goals: 3–6 (⌀ 3)

    Head-to-head based on Ettan data since 2023.

    Key facts

    • Hässleholms IF come into this round on 3 straight wins.
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Olympic
    Hässleholms IF
    When goals are scored and conceded — 2026
    Olympic (52–51)
    Hässleholms IF (49–31)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Olympic
    Martins Egbe: 267 passningar, xT 0.65EgbeAugust Karlin: 223 passningar, xT 0.7KarlinAlbin Sundgren: 167 passningar, xT 1.8SundgrenJacob Stern: 164 passningar, xT 0.1SternAlexander Robért: 160 passningar, xT 0.23RobértMattias Andersson: 148 passningar, xT 0.26AnderssonFrancis Dovi: 133 passningar, xT 0.21DoviOsama Khattab: 120 passningar, xT 1.7KhattabIgwe Emmanuel Chibuike: 119 passningar, xT 0.07ChibuikeMamudu Moro: 116 passningar, xT 0.26MoroCasper Nilsson: 90 passningar, xT 0.26Nilsson
    Hässleholms IF
    Rami Jassim: 204 passningar, xT 0.39JassimJohan Persson Åhstedt: 181 passningar, xT 2.45ÅhstedtAnton Branting: 160 passningar, xT 0.3BrantingAdi Terzic: 156 passningar, xT 0.42TerzicAlbin Andersson: 137 passningar, xT 0.35AnderssonPontus Carlsson: 116 passningar, xT 0.92CarlssonJussi Tikkanen: 99 passningar, xT 0.19TikkanenAlbin Ahlstrand: 66 passningar, xT 0.42AhlstrandVilmer Persson Åhstedt: 49 passningar, xT 0.57ÅhstedtTheo Ekström: 44 passningar, xT -0.01EkströmAlex Hall: 42 passningar, xT 0.1Hall
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Olympic
    Martins Egbe: 267 passningar, xT 0.65EgbeAugust Karlin: 223 passningar, xT 0.7KarlinAlbin Sundgren: 167 passningar, xT 1.8SundgrenJacob Stern: 164 passningar, xT 0.1SternAlexander Robért: 160 passningar, xT 0.23RobértMattias Andersson: 148 passningar, xT 0.26AnderssonFrancis Dovi: 133 passningar, xT 0.21DoviOsama Khattab: 120 passningar, xT 1.7KhattabIgwe Emmanuel Chibuike: 119 passningar, xT 0.07ChibuikeMamudu Moro: 116 passningar, xT 0.26MoroCasper Nilsson: 90 passningar, xT 0.26Nilsson
    Hässleholms IF
    Rami Jassim: 204 passningar, xT 0.39JassimJohan Persson Åhstedt: 181 passningar, xT 2.45ÅhstedtAnton Branting: 160 passningar, xT 0.3BrantingAdi Terzic: 156 passningar, xT 0.42TerzicAlbin Andersson: 137 passningar, xT 0.35AnderssonPontus Carlsson: 116 passningar, xT 0.92CarlssonJussi Tikkanen: 99 passningar, xT 0.19TikkanenAlbin Ahlstrand: 66 passningar, xT 0.42AhlstrandVilmer Persson Åhstedt: 49 passningar, xT 0.57ÅhstedtTheo Ekström: 44 passningar, xT -0.01EkströmAlex Hall: 42 passningar, xT 0.1Hall

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceOlympicHässleholms IF
    Points3651
    xPoints38.543.7
    xG per match1.71.4
    xGA per match1.51.1
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.190.26
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.310.31
    Playing styleOlympicHässleholms IF
    Build-up efficiency0.350.33
    Field tilt0.510.38
    xT per match1.61.4
    xTA per match1.51.6
    Won balls, offensive half2429
    Pressing intensity0.490.49
    Pressing efficiency0.260.29
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.260.3
    Entries into the box per match1510
    Entries into the box against1515
    Pass completion %0.830.73
    Pass completion % under pressure0.770.66
    Passes per match410267
    Passes against per match345382
    Switches of play per match15.815.7
    Long balls per match3124
    Set piecesOlympicHässleholms IF
    xG from free kicks0.210.19
    Corners per match63.5
    Corners against per match5.66.1
    xG per corner0.020.03
    xGA per corner against0.020.02
    First touch, offensive corners %0.510.29
    First touch, defensive corners %0.630.62
    OtherOlympicHässleholms IF
    Throw-in control0.640.48
    The goalkeepersJoakim Persson (Olympic)Liam Bengtsson (Hässleholms IF)
    Saves6843
    Save %61%64%
    xG prevented42%43%
    Claims107 (94%)105 (96%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Olympic vs Hässleholms IF according to our model?

    The model gives Olympic a 41% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Olympic 41%, draw 24%, Hässleholms IF 36%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 61% and under at 39%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 63% according to the model.

    How many goals are expected in Olympic vs Hässleholms IF?

    The model expects 1.71 goals (xG) for Olympic and 1.45 for Hässleholms IF, 3.16 in total.

    What does the model say about double chance?

    Olympic or draw (1X) 64%, Hässleholms IF or draw (X2) 59% and no draw (12) 76%.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.