01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Olympic or draw (1X)68%
- Over 1.5 goals83%
Swedish Ettan9°13 km/h
Läs på svenska
Hässleholms IFLow block & directBetBuilders AI model prediction for Olympic vs Hässleholms IF (Swedish Ettan, Friday, 30 October 2026): Olympic win 41%, draw 24%, Hässleholms IF win 36%. Expected goals (xG): Olympic 1.71, Hässleholms IF 1.45. Most likely score: 1-1 (11%). Over 2.5 goals 61%, both teams to score 63%. Double chance: Olympic or draw 64%, Hässleholms IF or draw 59%. Prediction updated Friday, 23 October 2026.
18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Erik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
TEXT: Olympic's possession-heavy approach will face a stern test against Hässleholms IF's direct and defensively solid setup. Olympic's strategy often involves controlling the game through a high press, which aligns with their 1.71 expected goals per match. However, Hässleholms' disciplined low block and recent form could disrupt their rhythm. The visitors have been riding high on a three-match winning streak, suggesting they have the momentum to challenge Olympic at home.
Despite Olympic's superior xG figures, Hässleholms have been more effective this season, with 51 points compared to Olympic's 36. Their ability to convert opportunities into points, combined with a lower xGA of 1.1, points to a tighter defense. Olympic's xGA of 1.5 indicates vulnerabilities, which Hässleholms will look to exploit with their direct play.
The head-to-head record is evenly split with one win each and a draw. However, the sample size of three matches is too small to significantly influence predictions. The model leans slightly towards Olympic with a 41% win probability, suggesting a close encounter. The most likely scorelines are 1-1 and 2-1, highlighting the potential for a narrow victory for the hosts. There's a 61% likelihood of over 2.5 goals, and both teams have a 63% chance to score, suggesting that goals could come at both ends despite Hässleholms' defensive prowess.
For bettors, the model's lean towards Olympic, despite the visitors' recent form, suggests a close contest worth monitoring. While not a guarantee, this represents a calculated angle based on current projections that might just pay off.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
No odds available yet.
Head-to-head based on Ettan data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Olympic | Hässleholms IF |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 36 | 51 |
| xPoints | 38.5 | 43.7 |
| xG per match | 1.7 | 1.4 |
| xGA per match | 1.5 | 1.1 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.19 | 0.26 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.31 | 0.31 |
| Playing style | Olympic | Hässleholms IF |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.35 | 0.33 |
| Field tilt | 0.51 | 0.38 |
| xT per match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| xTA per match | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 24 | 29 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.49 | 0.49 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.26 | 0.29 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.26 | 0.3 |
| Entries into the box per match | 15 | 10 |
| Entries into the box against | 15 | 15 |
| Pass completion % | 0.83 | 0.73 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.77 | 0.66 |
| Passes per match | 410 | 267 |
| Passes against per match | 345 | 382 |
| Switches of play per match | 15.8 | 15.7 |
| Long balls per match | 31 | 24 |
| Set pieces | Olympic | Hässleholms IF |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.21 | 0.19 |
| Corners per match | 6 | 3.5 |
| Corners against per match | 5.6 | 6.1 |
| xG per corner | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.51 | 0.29 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.63 | 0.62 |
| Other | Olympic | Hässleholms IF |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.64 | 0.48 |
| The goalkeepers | Joakim Persson (Olympic) | Liam Bengtsson (Hässleholms IF) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 68 | 43 |
| Save % | 61% | 64% |
| xG prevented | 42% | 43% |
| Claims | 107 (94%) | 105 (96%) |
The model gives Olympic a 41% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Olympic 41%, draw 24%, Hässleholms IF 36%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 61% and under at 39%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 63% according to the model.
The model expects 1.71 goals (xG) for Olympic and 1.45 for Hässleholms IF, 3.16 in total.
Olympic or draw (1X) 64%, Hässleholms IF or draw (X2) 59% and no draw (12) 76%.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Hämta bonus
Se ComeOns villkor
Hämta bonus
Se Hajpers villkor
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.