01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Åtvidaberg to win56%
- Over 1.5 goals82%
Swedish Ettan19°2,2 mm17 km/h
Läs på svenskaSofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work
The numbers paint a clear picture heading into the clash between Kristianstad FC and Åtvidaberg. There's been just one meeting between these two, and it ended in favor of Åtvidabergs FF. However, with such a small sample size, this holds less weight compared to current form and expected goals. The visitors come into this match riding a three-game winning streak and appear well-positioned to continue their dominance.
Kristianstad may have the home advantage, but their approach of relying on counter-attacks and crosses might struggle against Åtvidaberg's possession and high-press style. Despite having a slightly higher xPoints than their actual points suggest, Kristianstad's xG per match is a mere 0.97, significantly lower than Åtvidaberg's 1.7. This discrepancy highlights the home team's struggle to convert chances and maintain a solid defense, as evidenced by their xGA of 1.3 compared to the visitors' 1.1.
The likelihood of goals is prominent here. The model places the probability of over 2.5 goals at 60%, with both teams expected to score in 59% of simulations. While Kristianstad is expected to concede more, their counter-attacking style might snatch a goal. The most likely scorelines range from a balanced 1-1 to a more decisive 1-2 in favor of Åtvidaberg, echoing the visitors' superior form and attacking potential.
With Åtvidaberg given a 56% chance of winning and the potential for the match to see over 2.5 goals, their recent form and tactical edge make them the smart choice to back in this matchup.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
No odds available yet.
Head-to-head based on Ettan data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Kristianstad FC | Åtvidaberg |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 17 | 35 |
| xPoints | 22 | 28.9 |
| xG per match | 0.97 | 1.7 |
| xGA per match | 1.3 | 1.1 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.2 | 0.3 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.26 | 0.12 |
| Playing style | Kristianstad FC | Åtvidaberg |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.3 | 0.33 |
| Field tilt | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| xT per match | 1.3 | 1.5 |
| xTA per match | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 31 | 30 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.53 | 0.54 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.25 | 0.27 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.27 | 0.28 |
| Entries into the box per match | 11 | 15 |
| Entries into the box against | 15 | 10 |
| Pass completion % | 0.77 | 0.82 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.72 | 0.77 |
| Passes per match | 333 | 443 |
| Passes against per match | 401 | 345 |
| Switches of play per match | 20.1 | 13.9 |
| Long balls per match | 39 | 31 |
| Set pieces | Kristianstad FC | Åtvidaberg |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.11 | 0.13 |
| Corners per match | 4.7 | 6.4 |
| Corners against per match | 4.8 | 5.5 |
| xG per corner | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.46 | 0.27 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.62 | 0.66 |
| Other | Kristianstad FC | Åtvidaberg |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.54 | 0.58 |
| The goalkeepers | Otto Larsson Wågert (Kristianstad FC) | Hugo Claesson (Åtvidaberg) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 61 | 41 |
| Save % | 68% | 64% |
| xG prevented | 44% | 43% |
| Claims | 127 (96%) | 75 (93%) |
The model gives Åtvidaberg a 56% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Kristianstad FC 21%, draw 23%, Åtvidaberg 56%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 60% and under at 40%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 59% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.