01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Genk to win50%
- Over 1.5 goals77%
Belgian Pro LeagueCegeka Arena, Genk19°32,4 mm17 km/h
Läs på svenska
GenkPossession control
BeverenBalanced & physicalMarcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work
The head-to-head analysis between Genk and Beveren is limited by a small sample size, making the current form and expected goals more telling. As we dive into the numbers, Genk's possession-oriented approach contrasts with Beveren's balanced and physical style. This battle of tactics could shape the match's outcome as much as any individual brilliance.
Genk has a slight upper hand with 4 points to Beveren's 3, but the xPoints tell a sharper story: Genk leads 4.8 to Beveren's 2.0. It's a similar pattern with expected goals, where Genk averages 1.9 per match compared to Beveren's 0.8. Defensively, Genk also holds the fort better, conceding an expected 1.1 goals per match against Beveren's leaky 2.4. The possession game of the home side might stifle Beveren, who will need to leverage their physicality to disrupt Genk’s rhythm.
Weather conditions with predicted rain could dampen goal-scoring opportunities, but the model still leans slightly toward over 2.5 goals at 52% probability and both teams finding the net at 54%. Despite the weather, Genk's expected goal tally of 1.70 suggests they might just edge this encounter.
While Genk is favored to win at 50%, the odds for Beveren present a compelling value play. With Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet offering odds of 6.3 for an away win, there’s a significant 61% edge according to the model’s 26% win probability for Beveren. If you're looking to angle for value, a cautious punt on the visitors might just pay off, despite the statistical edge lying with the hosts.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Genk | X | 2 · Beveren |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 1.45 | EV+ 10% 4.50 | EV+ 61% 6.30 |
| Betsson | 1.45 | EV+ 10% 4.50 | EV+ 61% 6.30 |
| Nordicbet | 1.45 | EV+ 10% 4.50 | EV+ 61% 6.30 |
| Pinnacle | 1.47 | EV+ 19% 4.87 | EV+ 63% 6.36 |
Odds updated 28 Aug, 11:38
1.49 → 1.47
4.60 → 4.87
5.83 → 6.36
Pinnacle · 8 recorded price levels · 27/08/2026 → 28/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Genk | Beveren |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 4 | 3 |
| xPoints | 4.8 | 2 |
| xG per match | 1.9 | 0.8 |
| xGA per match | 1.1 | 2.4 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.12 | 0.04 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.14 | 0.31 |
| Playing style | Genk | Beveren |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.31 | 0.31 |
| Field tilt | 0.52 | 0.41 |
| xT per match | 1.2 | 0.99 |
| xTA per match | 1.3 | 1.7 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 30 | 28 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.26 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.29 | 0.27 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.16 | 0.22 |
| Entries into the box per match | 13 | 13 |
| Entries into the box against | 13 | 19 |
| Pass completion % | 0.79 | 0.77 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.75 | 0.73 |
| Passes per match | 407 | 421 |
| Passes against per match | 312 | 402 |
| Switches of play per match | 33.9 | 33.7 |
| Long balls per match | 43 | 46 |
| Set pieces | Genk | Beveren |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.06 | 0.02 |
| Corners per match | 4.9 | 3.4 |
| Corners against per match | 4.9 | 6.1 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.08 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.47 | 0.6 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.53 | 0.41 |
| Other | Genk | Beveren |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.77 | 0.78 |
| The goalkeepers | Lucca Brughmans (Genk) | Johannes Schenk (Beveren) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 6 | 16 |
| Save % | 46% | 73% |
| xG prevented | 18% | 44% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Genk a 50% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Genk 50%, draw 24%, Beveren 26%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 52% and under at 48%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 54% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.