Belgian Pro LeagueCegeka Arena, Genk19°32,4 mm17 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    GenkGenkPossession control
    40
    BeverenBeverenBalanced & physical
    The model's lean: 1 · Genk (50%)Best value by the model: 2 · Beveren @ 6.36 (+63 %)

    GenkBeveren · Belgian Pro League

    1 · Genk 50%X 24%26% Beveren · 2

    Analysis: GenkBeveren

    Marcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work

    The head-to-head analysis between Genk and Beveren is limited by a small sample size, making the current form and expected goals more telling. As we dive into the numbers, Genk's possession-oriented approach contrasts with Beveren's balanced and physical style. This battle of tactics could shape the match's outcome as much as any individual brilliance.

    Genk has a slight upper hand with 4 points to Beveren's 3, but the xPoints tell a sharper story: Genk leads 4.8 to Beveren's 2.0. It's a similar pattern with expected goals, where Genk averages 1.9 per match compared to Beveren's 0.8. Defensively, Genk also holds the fort better, conceding an expected 1.1 goals per match against Beveren's leaky 2.4. The possession game of the home side might stifle Beveren, who will need to leverage their physicality to disrupt Genk’s rhythm.

    Weather conditions with predicted rain could dampen goal-scoring opportunities, but the model still leans slightly toward over 2.5 goals at 52% probability and both teams finding the net at 54%. Despite the weather, Genk's expected goal tally of 1.70 suggests they might just edge this encounter.

    While Genk is favored to win at 50%, the odds for Beveren present a compelling value play. With Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet offering odds of 6.3 for an away win, there’s a significant 61% edge according to the model’s 26% win probability for Beveren. If you're looking to angle for value, a cautious punt on the visitors might just pay off, despite the statistical edge lying with the hosts.

    GenkGenk
    Form WDLWD
    League ranking xG #7xGA #7xT #8xP/match #7Points #9
    Key players
    • Bryan HeynenCMxG 0.27 · xT 0.20
    • Rafiu Adekunle DurosinmiFxG 0.73 · xT -0.01
    • Joris KayembeLBxG 0.00 · xT 0.16
    BeverenBeveren
    Form LWL
    League ranking xG #17xGA #14xT #11xP/match #16Points #10
    Key players
    • Chris-Emmanuel Dikwama LokesaLWxG 0.05 · xT 0.01
    • Laurent JansRWBxG 0.00 · xT 0.21
    • Christian BrülsCAMxG 0.14 · xT 0.29
    Final score
    40
    The model called the outcome
    Predicted probabilities: Genk 50% · Draw 24% · Beveren 26%

    How the bookmaker bet builders went

    The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.

    Matchresultat - BeverenBåda lagen gör mål - JaTotalt antal mål - Över 3.5
    odds 15,40fair 17,46-12 %
    Miss
    Matchresultat - RC GenkBåda lagen gör mål - JaTotalt antal mål - Över 3.5
    odds 3,58fair 6,99-49 %
    Miss

    Match prediction: GenkBeveren

    Predicted score matrix

    Beveren
    Genk
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–06.6%
    0–16.4%
    0–23.6%
    0–31.3%
    0–4+0.4%
    1
    1–010.3%
    1–111.7%
    1–26.1%
    1–32.2%
    1–4+0.7%
    2
    2–09.1%
    2–19.7%
    2–25.2%
    2–31.8%
    2–4+0.6%
    3
    3–05.1%
    3–15.5%
    3–22.9%
    3–31.0%
    3–4+0.4%
    4+
    4+–03.2%
    4+–13.4%
    4+–21.8%
    4+–30.7%
    4+–4+0.2%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-112%
    2. 2.1-010%
    3. 3.2-110%
    4. 4.2-09%
    5. 5.0-07%
    Expected goals
    1,701,07
    Both teams to score
    54%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,8
    Under 2,548%
    @2.62EV+25%
    Over 2,552%
    @1.47

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Genk to win50%
    • Over 1.5 goals77%

    Combined probability

    41%

    Fair odds

    2.42

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Genk to win50%
    • Over 2.5 goals52%
    • Konstantinos Karetsas to score29%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score54%
    • Over 2.5 goals52%
    • Konstantinos Karetsas to score29%
    • Viktor Luc Boone to be booked22%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 2 · Beveren26% probability@6.36PinnacleEV+63%reference odds
    • 2 · Beveren26% probability@6.30BetsafeEV+61%reference odds
    • 2 · Beveren26% probability@6.30BetssonEV+61%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · GenkX2 · Beveren
    Betsafe1.45
    EV+ 10%
    4.50
    EV+ 61%
    6.30
    Betsson1.45
    EV+ 10%
    4.50
    EV+ 61%
    6.30
    Nordicbet1.45
    EV+ 10%
    4.50
    EV+ 61%
    6.30
    Pinnacle1.47
    EV+ 19%
    4.87
    EV+ 63%
    6.36

    Odds updated 28 Aug, 11:38

    Odds movement

    1-1 %
    67 %62 %

    1.491.47

    X+6 %
    23 %18 %

    4.604.87

    2+9 %
    18 %13 %

    5.836.36

    Pinnacle · 8 recorded price levels · 27/08/2026 → 28/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Genk
    Beveren
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Genk (88)
    Beveren (26)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Genk
    Josue Ndenge Kongolo: 190 passningar, xT -0.06KongoloJoris Kayembe: 159 passningar, xT 0.4KayembeBryan Heynen: 130 passningar, xT 0.57HeynenNikolas Sattlberger: 95 passningar, xT 0.11SattlbergerIbrahima Sory Bangoura: 94 passningar, xT -0.02BangouraZakaria El Ouahdi: 89 passningar, xT 0.25OuahdiMatte Smets: 86 passningar, xT 0.18SmetsJunya Ito: 85 passningar, xT 0.64ItoJeppe Erenbjerg: 80 passningar, xT 0.7ErenbjergLucca Brughmans: 77 passningar, xT 0.11BrughmansAyumu Yokoyama: 48 passningar, xT 0.16Yokoyama
    Beveren
    Christian Brüls: 155 passningar, xT 0.63BrülsYoni Gomis: 154 passningar, xT 0.13GomisBruno Godeau: 151 passningar, xT 0.07GodeauChristophe Arnold Janssens: 149 passningar, xT 0.56JanssensLaurent Jans: 125 passningar, xT 0.58JansJohannes Schenk: 92 passningar, xT 0.15SchenkSieben Dewaele: 91 passningar, xT 0.1DewaeleFerre Slegers: 68 passningar, xT 0.34SlegersChris-Emmanuel Dikwama Lokesa: 66 passningar, xT 0LokesaKurt Abrahams: 50 passningar, xT 0.02AbrahamsCheick Oumar Conde: 48 passningar, xT 0Conde
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Genk
    Josue Ndenge Kongolo: 190 passningar, xT -0.06KongoloJoris Kayembe: 159 passningar, xT 0.4KayembeBryan Heynen: 130 passningar, xT 0.57HeynenNikolas Sattlberger: 95 passningar, xT 0.11SattlbergerIbrahima Sory Bangoura: 94 passningar, xT -0.02BangouraZakaria El Ouahdi: 89 passningar, xT 0.25OuahdiMatte Smets: 86 passningar, xT 0.18SmetsJunya Ito: 85 passningar, xT 0.64ItoJeppe Erenbjerg: 80 passningar, xT 0.7ErenbjergLucca Brughmans: 77 passningar, xT 0.11BrughmansAyumu Yokoyama: 48 passningar, xT 0.16Yokoyama
    Beveren
    Christian Brüls: 155 passningar, xT 0.63BrülsYoni Gomis: 154 passningar, xT 0.13GomisBruno Godeau: 151 passningar, xT 0.07GodeauChristophe Arnold Janssens: 149 passningar, xT 0.56JanssensLaurent Jans: 125 passningar, xT 0.58JansJohannes Schenk: 92 passningar, xT 0.15SchenkSieben Dewaele: 91 passningar, xT 0.1DewaeleFerre Slegers: 68 passningar, xT 0.34SlegersChris-Emmanuel Dikwama Lokesa: 66 passningar, xT 0LokesaKurt Abrahams: 50 passningar, xT 0.02AbrahamsCheick Oumar Conde: 48 passningar, xT 0Conde

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceGenkBeveren
    Points43
    xPoints4.82
    xG per match1.90.8
    xGA per match1.12.4
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.120.04
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.140.31
    Playing styleGenkBeveren
    Build-up efficiency0.310.31
    Field tilt0.520.41
    xT per match1.20.99
    xTA per match1.31.7
    Won balls, offensive half3028
    Pressing intensity0.230.26
    Pressing efficiency0.290.27
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.160.22
    Entries into the box per match1313
    Entries into the box against1319
    Pass completion %0.790.77
    Pass completion % under pressure0.750.73
    Passes per match407421
    Passes against per match312402
    Switches of play per match33.933.7
    Long balls per match4346
    Set piecesGenkBeveren
    xG from free kicks0.060.02
    Corners per match4.93.4
    Corners against per match4.96.1
    xG per corner0.030.08
    xGA per corner against0.010.03
    First touch, offensive corners %0.470.6
    First touch, defensive corners %0.530.41
    OtherGenkBeveren
    Throw-in control0.770.78
    The goalkeepersLucca Brughmans (Genk)Johannes Schenk (Beveren)
    Saves616
    Save %46%73%
    xG prevented18%44%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Genk vs Beveren according to our model?

    The model gives Genk a 50% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Genk 50%, draw 24%, Beveren 26%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 52% and under at 48%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 54% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.