01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance AGF or draw (1X)66%
- Over 1.5 goals78%
Danish SuperligaCeres Park, Aarhus10°17,2 mm54 km/h
Läs på svenskaBetBuilders AI model prediction for AGF vs Viborg (Danish Superliga, Sunday, 25 October 2026): AGF win 40%, draw 26%, Viborg win 34%. Expected goals (xG): AGF 1.49, Viborg 1.36. Most likely score: 1-1 (12%). Over 2.5 goals 54%, both teams to score 58%. Double chance: AGF or draw 66%, Viborg or draw 60%. Prediction updated Saturday, 17 October 2026.
18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Anna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work
Four wins to one in seven encounters paint a picture of AGF's historical control over Viborg in this matchup. Yet, as the two sides prepare to clash again, it's crucial to note that the visitors have had the upper hand in the broader context of the current season, amassing 20 points to the hosts' 9. The head-to-head sample size remains small, and while past dominance is significant, it doesn't fully capture AGF's underwhelming form this campaign.
AGF's model-backed probability leads at 40%, but Viborg is close behind at 34%. This narrow margin highlights a tight contest, further complicated by the hosts' aggressive possession play clashing with Viborg's effective counter-attacking and cross-heavy strategies. Despite AGF's historically high-scoring meetings with Viborg—averaging 4.0 goals per fixture—current expected goals suggest a more subdued affair, with AGF at 1.49 and Viborg at 1.36.
Weather conditions are set to influence proceedings, with nearly 17.2 mm of rain potentially stifling open play and goal-scoring chances. This damp forecast is integrated into the models, which anticipate a slight lean towards under 2.5 goals. Both teams have shown a propensity to concede: AGF averages 1.6 xGA per match, while Viborg is slightly tighter at 1.2.
For bettors, the sharpest angle may lie in the value found on the under. LeoVegas offers odds of 2.3 on under 2.5 goals, presenting a 5% edge according to the model's 46% rating. Alternatively, Betsafe's 2.28 odds also provide a tempting 4% edge. While AGF's historical edge cannot be dismissed, the conditions and Viborg's current form suggest a more cautious approach might be prudent, with 1-1 emerging as the most likely scoreline.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · AGF | X | 2 · Viborg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 2.42 | 3.50 | 2.75 |
| LeoVegas | 2.40 | 3.65 | 2.80 |
| Nordicbet | 2.45 | 3.50 | 2.78 |
| Pinnacle | 2.42 | 3.65 | 2.73 |
Odds updated 24 Oct, 08:22
2.42 → 2.42
3.65 → 3.65
2.73 → 2.73
Pinnacle · 2 recorded price levels · 23/10/2026 → 24/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Danish Superliga data since 2022.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | AGF | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 9 | 20 |
| xPoints | 13.9 | 18.5 |
| xG per match | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| xGA per match | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.31 | 0.3 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.27 | 0.27 |
| Playing style | AGF | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.31 | 0.31 |
| Field tilt | 0.57 | 0.46 |
| xT per match | 1 | 1.2 |
| xTA per match | 1 | 0.93 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 24 | 23 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.28 | 0.27 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.26 | 0.22 |
| Entries into the box per match | 15 | 14 |
| Entries into the box against | 13 | 12 |
| Pass completion % | 0.78 | 0.78 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.71 | 0.75 |
| Passes per match | 419 | 384 |
| Passes against per match | 323 | 410 |
| Switches of play per match | 22.5 | 31.1 |
| Long balls per match | 26 | 32 |
| Set pieces | AGF | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Corners per match | 6.2 | 5 |
| Corners against per match | 4.1 | 5.6 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.04 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.29 | 0.3 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.6 | 0.64 |
| Other | AGF | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.72 | 0.71 |
| The goalkeepers | Mads Hedenstad Christiansen (AGF) | Kasper Kiilerich (Viborg) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 19 | 34 |
| Save % | 58% | 77% |
| xG prevented | 39% | 55% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives AGF a 40% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: AGF 40%, draw 26%, Viborg 34%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 54% and under at 46%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 58% according to the model.
The model expects 1.49 goals (xG) for AGF and 1.36 for Viborg, 2.85 in total.
AGF or draw (1X) 66%, Viborg or draw (X2) 60% and no draw (12) 74%.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Hämta bonus
Se ComeOns villkor
Hämta bonus
Se Hajpers villkor
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.