01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Bristol City or draw (1X)76%
- Under 3.5 goals80%
EFL ChampionshipAshton Gate, Bristol15°0,8 mm25 km/h
Läs på svenskaErik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
TEXT: Bristol City heads into this clash with a 45% win probability, asserting themselves as the favorites to secure three points. A 1-0 victory is the most likely outcome at 14%, underscoring their recent form and defense-first approach. The hosts have won their last three matches; this momentum is reflected in their superior points tally of 10, despite Watford having a higher xPoints of 8.5.
Both teams exhibit a low defense and direct style, suggesting a cautious encounter, with neither side likely to dominate possession. The expected goals for the hosts sit at 1.39 compared to Watford's 0.91, indicating a slight edge for Bristol in offensive output. Despite the Hornets leading the head-to-head record 2-1 in a small sample of four games since 2023, the form and data favor the hosts.
The match leans toward a low-scoring affair, with an over 2.5 goals probability of just 40% and both teams to score at 45%. Risk-averse bettors might note the under 2.5 goals as a solid choice, possibly echoing the model's preference. The model's lean toward Bristol City, supported by recent form, makes them the more favorable pick, though no specific betting odds are provided in the data to substantiate a particular value bet.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
No odds available yet.
Head-to-head based on Championship data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Bristol City | Watford |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 10 | 8 |
| xPoints | 6.2 | 8.5 |
| xG per match | 0.94 | 1.2 |
| xGA per match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.22 | 0.28 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.26 | 0.3 |
| Playing style | Bristol City | Watford |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.3 | 0.29 |
| Field tilt | 0.32 | 0.43 |
| xT per match | 0.68 | 0.82 |
| xTA per match | 1.3 | 1.2 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 21 | 23 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.31 | 0.26 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.27 | 0.21 |
| Entries into the box per match | 9 | 10 |
| Entries into the box against | 13 | 13 |
| Pass completion % | 0.66 | 0.73 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.61 | 0.7 |
| Passes per match | 240 | 297 |
| Passes against per match | 364 | 408 |
| Switches of play per match | 15.8 | 21.2 |
| Long balls per match | 24 | 25 |
| Set pieces | Bristol City | Watford |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.09 | 0.04 |
| Corners per match | 4.3 | 3.1 |
| Corners against per match | 6.5 | 7.1 |
| xG per corner | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.05 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.23 | 0.37 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.73 | 0.67 |
| Other | Bristol City | Watford |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.68 | 0.63 |
| The goalkeepers | Rob Dickie (Bristol City) | Federico Ravaglia (Watford) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 8 | 18 |
| Save % | 100% | 75% |
| xG prevented | 100% | 70% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Bristol City a 45% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Bristol City 45%, draw 30%, Watford 25%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-0 at 14% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 40% and under at 60%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 45% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.